Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:35 PM Jun 2014

How about "old white Republican men" instead of "old white men"?

We have seen in the last few days that many good DUers fall under the classification of "old white men".

Or perhaps even "old Republican men" so that we don't exclude people like Clarence Thomas (age 65)?

Or maybe even "Republican men"? (Ted Cruz is only 43, after all).

Or how about just "Republicans"? Why exclude the Sarah Palins and Michele Bachmanns? Or is this just too crazy?

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How about "old white Republican men" instead of "old white men"? (Original Post) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 OP
How about stop the racist, sexist and ageist labeling altogether? Skip Intro Jun 2014 #1
That being the perfect solution, it will of course be avoided Dragonfli Jun 2014 #17
For a place which SHOULD fight against any manifestation of sexism or racism, aka-chmeee Jun 2014 #30
How about fuckin' right wingers? treestar Jun 2014 #2
No, because that would include right wing conservative Democrats that post here Dragonfli Jun 2014 #20
Yes, agreed. Republicans/RWers/Conservatives. CJCRANE Jun 2014 #3
Why stop now? 1000words Jun 2014 #4
If it makes you feel warm and fuzzy JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #5
What he has always been is what he is now.... Tikki Jun 2014 #6
What, are you trying to rob me Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #7
Because of the complications. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #8
bi-lateral corruption ... ? can you expand on that term, please. Thanks. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #11
I suspect that they're a primitive form of Third Way. Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #14
yes, understand now. thanks. Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #15
Wow......this really strikes a nerve with some people huh? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #9
Insufficient. Old white center right Democratic men are also part of the problem. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #10
thank you, WS Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2014 #12
And it really gets screwy when neo-liberal Democrats refer to themselves as Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #13
I know what you mean, they love calling themselves liberals and even use "progressive" Dragonfli Jun 2014 #23
And one particular city attorney who was providing legal cover for this bullshit Baitball Blogger Jun 2014 #24
Wow, seeking martyrdom as an activist while gaming the system for private interests Dragonfli Jun 2014 #26
Perfectly stated. Dancing around the problem benefits none of us, ultimately. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #32
How about "reactionary"? Populist_Prole Jun 2014 #16
Good enough, I suppose. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #33
Because then DU wouldn't have a race war! RiffRandell Jun 2014 #18
"The baiting, divisionary tactics are intentional. Don't be fooled." SMC22307 Jun 2014 #21
You're conflating individual variation with the more systemic social hierarchy YoungDemCA Jun 2014 #19
+1 nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #34
yup, anytime people bring things up JI7 Jun 2014 #35
I've been thinking about this ismnotwasm Jun 2014 #22
I'm not old, dammit! eallen Jun 2014 #25
because the swarm insists that Doctor_J Jun 2014 #27
No. There are plenty of old liberal and progressive white men who still don't "get it." hunter Jun 2014 #28
And there are plenty who do get it, and have been getting it way longer SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #29
I've never been discarded or lumped. hunter Jun 2014 #37
Well.. SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #38
I'm not lumped. hunter Jun 2014 #40
and you have people like Boehner and McCain who have no problem with their kids JI7 Jun 2014 #31
Hypocrisy. hunter Jun 2014 #39
"They write amusing letters to the local newspapers..." nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #36
Yeah, they remember when all "those people" lived on the other side of the river or railroad tracks. hunter Jun 2014 #41

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
17. That being the perfect solution, it will of course be avoided
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:39 PM
Jun 2014

likely because of the odd belief that the perfect solution is somehow the enemy of good (or some such similar nonsense that I hear every time the best solutions are proposed).

aka-chmeee

(1,132 posts)
30. For a place which SHOULD fight against any manifestation of sexism or racism,
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:39 PM
Jun 2014

There seems to be a strong fashion of ageism, sexism and racism considered proper and even encouraged here especially when combined and directed at "old white men". I try to take it with a grain of salt, but even at that modest dose, it is causing me difficulty with my high blood pressure.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
20. No, because that would include right wing conservative Democrats that post here
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:49 PM
Jun 2014

That would start a war with those that support free trade, drones, entitlement reform - pretty much all the policies that thirdway.org, Obama, Clinton and those that support them here on this board adhere to.

Unless this is to become a progressive only site such would not be advised, at least a third of the posters here are into Rubin and Summers for Goddess sake and support Democrats that freely admit their policies are not much different than 80's Republicans.

I think therefore we need the Republican qualifier rather than throwing out all the DLC folks or constantly insulting them.

Tikki

(14,549 posts)
6. What he has always been is what he is now....
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:46 PM
Jun 2014

Thank you...

My old man was a young man and has always been white and has always been very progressive...
Nobody pulls anything over on him and he will not stand for bigotry or the stupid in his presence.
He is vocal...I like that about him.



Tikki

Baitball Blogger

(46,680 posts)
8. Because of the complications.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jun 2014

The Republicans have an agenda which is very ego-race related. It's an agenda that also resonates with those Southern Democrats who are racist. It's naive to believe they don't exist. In fact, that's the danger of sticking it to the Republican party. They are just the ones who are open about it.

I can tell you from living in a community that has bi-lateral corruption, that your classification won't be enough. We are dealing with a very autocratic, conservative white male problem. In fact, maybe that's what you should call it. It's an autocratic, conservative white male. ACWM or CAWM.

Baitball Blogger

(46,680 posts)
14. I suspect that they're a primitive form of Third Way.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:22 PM
Jun 2014

In small towns, social networking IS government process. People from both sides of the aisle associate with each other through business organizations, such as the Chamber of Commerce. They find a lot of common ground in these private organizations, and many of these organizations have welcoming mats for elected officials. In small cozy, local areas, such as mine, corruption crosses party lines. There really is no oversight or regulatory service to stop them.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
10. Insufficient. Old white center right Democratic men are also part of the problem.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jun 2014

Everyone who bought into the neolib neocon Thatcher/Reagan bullshit starting in the late 70's and continuing to this day is part of the problem. The ideological "mainstream" has failed, it has failed on many levels, and the generation in charge of that failure is the boomer generation, now officially "old", and the leaders of that generation are almost entirely old white men.

We have met the enemy and he is us.

Baitball Blogger

(46,680 posts)
13. And it really gets screwy when neo-liberal Democrats refer to themselves as
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jun 2014

Liberals. Not the same thing by a long shot. They have it in their heads that a Liberal is someone who uses the "public benefit" for the good of the community to promote large public works programs. That's the packaging. What they really want to do is ignore government process to make it easier for their buddies to get the road contracts and government money. Hell, it can get so crooked that elected officials own or represent property in the very special districts that they're discussing in city meetings. And when people start getting their rights denied, they'll blame it on Liberals, when true Liberals had nothing to do with it.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
23. I know what you mean, they love calling themselves liberals and even use "progressive"
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jun 2014

For instance, the "Progressive Policy Institute" (a neoliberal think tank) has a very misleading name, of course, that's Will Marshal for ya.

Baitball Blogger

(46,680 posts)
24. And one particular city attorney who was providing legal cover for this bullshit
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 03:07 PM
Jun 2014

had the audacity to whine because he said he had been criticized for being an activist! They are very clever with the titles and tags, but in the end, it's just crooked.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
26. Wow, seeking martyrdom as an activist while gaming the system for private interests
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jun 2014

That one has a set of something made of brass, the sad thing is that there will be many that buy the act.

How have so many become so gullible so quickly in this country? The marketing has been far too successful.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
32. Perfectly stated. Dancing around the problem benefits none of us, ultimately.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:53 PM
Jun 2014

Short-term comfort will give way to long-term disaster.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
16. How about "reactionary"?
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:35 PM
Jun 2014

The term hasn't been in widespread use since the 70's but it really does sum up that demographic accurrately in in fewest words IMO.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
18. Because then DU wouldn't have a race war!
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jun 2014

This place is seriously fucked, and I blame certain people for bringing it down to this level.

The baiting, divisionary tactics are intentional. Don't be fooled.

ismnotwasm

(41,965 posts)
22. I've been thinking about this
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 02:53 PM
Jun 2014

"Old" is now considered middle aged, but "white and male" despite advances, still rules

And profound apologies to people who are offended by "old" It's not you.



Table 1 shows the average ages at the beginning of the 113th Congress.
Table 1. Average Age of Members, 111th-113th Congresses
Average (mean) age at the beginning of the Congress
Congress
113th 112th 111th
Representatives
57.0 years 56.7 years 57.2 years
Newly Elected Representatives
49.2 years 48.2 years 49.8 years
Senators
62.0 years 62.2 years 63.1 years
Source: CRS calculations based on CQ Roll Call Member Profiles.
Notes: Representatives age data do not include the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner. “Newly Elected”
Members data do not include those returning to the House or Senate for a second time.
The U.S. Constitution requires Representatives to be at least 25 years old when they take office. The youngest Representative at the beginning of the 113th Congress is 30-year-old Patrick Murphy (D-FL), born March 30, 1983. The oldest Representative in U.S. history, as well as the oldest current Member of Congress, is 90-year-old Ralph Hall (R-TX), born May 3, 1923.
Senators must be at least 30 years old when they take office. The oldest Senator in the 113th Congress is Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), 80, born June 22, 1933.7 The youngest Senator is 40-year- old Christopher S. Murphy (D-CT), born August 3, 1973.

Gender and Ethnicity Female Members
A record 102 women (18.8% of total membership) serve in the 113th Congress as of December 2013, 10 more than at the beginning of the 112th Congress.21 Eighty-one women, including 3 Delegates, serve in the House and 20 in the Senate. Of the 82 women in the House, 63 are Democrats, including the 3 Delegates, and 19 are Republicans. Of the 20 women in the Senate, 16 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.




African American Members
There are 44 African American Members (8.1% of the total membership) in the 113th Congress; the same number as at the beginning of the 112th Congress. Forty-two serve in the House, including 2 Delegates, and 2 serve in the Senate.22 This number includes one Member of the House who is of African American and Asian ancestry and is counted in both ethnic categories in this report. All of the 42 House Members, including 2 Delegates, are Democrats, and there is a Senator of each party. Sixteen African American women, including two Delegates, serve in the House.

Hispanic/Latino American Members
There are 37 Hispanic or Latino Members in the 113th Congress, 6.9% of the total membership.23 Thirty-three serve in the House and four in the Senate. Of the Members of the House, 26 are Democrats (including 1 Delegate and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico),24 7 are Republicans, and 9 are women. There are 4 male Hispanic Senators (3 Republicans, 1 Democrat). One set of Hispanic Members, Representatives Linda Sánchez and Loretta Sanchez,25 are sisters.26

Asian/Pacific Islander American Members
Thirteen Members of the 113th Congress (2.4% of the total membership, the same as at the beginning of the 112th Congress) are of Asian, South Asian, or Pacific Islander ancestry. Twelve of them (all Democrats) serve in the House, and one (a Democrat) serves in the Senate. Of those serving in the House, two are Delegates. Seven of the Asian Pacific American Members are female: six in the House and one in the Senate.27

These numbers include one House Member who is also of African American ancestry and another of Hispanic ancestry; these Members are counted in both ethnic categories.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42964.pdf

Oh and I found this interesting:

As has been true in recent Congresses, the vast majority of Members (93% of House Members and 99% of Senators) at the beginning of the 113th Congress hold bachelor’s degrees. The CQ Roll Call Member Profiles at the beginning of the 113th Congress indicate the following:

• 21 Members of the House and 1 Senator have no educational degree beyond a high school diploma;
• 7 Members of the House, but no Senators, have associate’s degrees as their highest degree, and 1 House Member has an L.P.N. (nursing) degree;
• 85 members of the House and 14 Senators earned a master’s degree as their highest education degree;
• Law degrees are held by 169 Members of the House (38% of the House) and 57 Senators (57% of the Senate);
• Of the Members holding a law degree, 4 (3 House Members and 1 Senator) also hold an LL.M. (Master of Laws) degree;
• 20 Representatives (but no Senators) have doctoral (Ph.D. or D.Phil.) degrees; and
• 22 Members of the House and 3 Senators have a medical degree.15
By comparison, approximately 30 years ago in the 97th Congress (1981-1982), 84% of House Members and 88% of Senators held bachelor’s degrees. Forty years ago, in the 92nd Congress (1971-1972), 77% of House Members and 87% of Senators held bachelor’s degrees. Fifty years ago, in the 87th Congress (1961-1962), 71% of House Members and 76% of Senators held bachelor’s degrees.16
Three Representatives and one Senator in the 113th Congress are graduates of the U.S. Military Academy and one Senator and one Representative graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy. Two Senators and two Representatives were Rhodes Scholars, two Representatives were Fulbright Scholars, two Representatives were Marshall Scholars, and one Representative was a Truman Scholar.17

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
27. because the swarm insists that
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 04:37 PM
Jun 2014

opposition by liberals to fracking, TPP, race to the bottom, for-profit health care, and school privatization are due to racism

hunter

(38,301 posts)
28. No. There are plenty of old liberal and progressive white men who still don't "get it."
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 05:47 PM
Jun 2014

My grandfather was a decent old white California gentleman, liberal and progressive in many ways. He had black, Asian, and gay friends and coworkers. He rarely classified anyone by race, religion, sex, or sexuality. He'd share meals with anyone. He probably would have voted Obama over Romney or McCain.

But he was not happy when I married, in his words, "a Mexican girl." Dating 'em okay, marriage no.

To his credit, he got over that.

His parent's generation were ashamed of their mixed Irish Catholic Heritage and retreated to America's Wild West claiming to be Presbyterians because the Irish got the crappy jobs, just one step above the Chinese. East coast imaginary WASP was the only "real" white, but Scots Irish Protestant white had higher status than Irish or European Catholic, or Scandinavian heretic.

I grew up in an Ivory soap white "Prosperity Christian" community. I escaped that hell. Most of my life I've lived in communities where white guys like me are a minority, but I still feel the white privilege sometimes, a surprising reflexive "No problem, sir" from older people, or a mildly amused and slightly sardonic "sir" from younger people trying to scope out if I'm old white California asshole. There are some old white California assholes left. They write amusing letters to the local newspapers, not realizing that most of the audience sees them as funny old fossils.

I have high school classmates who would consider themselves liberal or progressive but they've never lived outside the comfort zone of their white segregated world.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
29. And there are plenty who do get it, and have been getting it way longer
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jun 2014

that the people who seem to want to discard them or lump them in with the people who "don't get it".



hunter

(38,301 posts)
37. I've never been discarded or lumped.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:24 PM
Jun 2014

Even when I've been an asshole.

My earliest usenet posts, long long ago, were somewhat libertarian. I thought government should get out of the marriage business altogether in favor of civil unions for all. Get married later in a church if you like.

Now I say marriage, straight or not, is a civil right that ought to be recognized and celebrated by the entire community and fully defended by the legal system.

I escaped white Republican suburbia to become a public school science teacher in urban Los Angeles. Later my wife and I have lived in black Midwestern neighborhoods, Southwest Indian Reservations, and now I'm a white guy in a mostly very cosmopolitan "Mexican American" neighborhood.

My wife and kids are at home here, and I'm home too.

Nowadays when I visit anyplace where most everyone is white then it feels very strange. My childhood home is an alien world and I would never go back. My parents, me, and my siblings have all abandoned that place.

hunter

(38,301 posts)
40. I'm not lumped.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:43 PM
Jun 2014

I drive a thirty year old salvage title car and I don't shave my face or wear a necktie.

Not your typical white guy.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
31. and you have people like Boehner and McCain who have no problem with their kids
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jun 2014

marrying a black man and a black woman.

so while most of the republican party is fucked up nothing is 100 percent on both sides .

hunter

(38,301 posts)
39. Hypocrisy.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:35 PM
Jun 2014

The New Testament has a few things to say about that.

I'm a heretic, I build upon my religious upbringing, I don't look for the loopholes.

Same as when I figure out my taxes.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
36. "They write amusing letters to the local newspapers..."
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:01 PM
Jun 2014

I've seen more than a few examples of this, living in Contra Costa County. Most of the old conservative fogies seem to be from Danville or Antioch, or somewhere out that way.

hunter

(38,301 posts)
41. Yeah, they remember when all "those people" lived on the other side of the river or railroad tracks.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:54 PM
Jun 2014
Sundown law in white California persisted well into the 'seventies and occasionally beyond.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How about "old white...