General Discussion

kimbutgar

(21,055 posts) Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:03 PM Jun 2014

Is faux covering this las Vegas right wing terrorist shooting?

I read on DU the shooters sold everything and went to the Bundy Ranch. If this is so, I want to blame faux and Sean hannity for conflating the tax dodger Bundy and influencing these two terrorists to kill two cops enjoying a meal on their break.

Sean you have blood on your hands. Just like bill o'reilly. Evil rhetoric kills innocent people. I hope you both fry in hell one day.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is faux covering this las Vegas right wing terrorist shooting? (Original Post) kimbutgar Jun 2014 OP

No, they are talking about Hilary, Bergdahl, and Tracy Morgan. SummerSnow Jun 2014 #1

Shooting? What shooting? gratuitous Jun 2014 #2

+1,000 n/t malaise Jun 2014 #6

Covering it does not begin to describe it. More like burying it. nt Xipe Totec Jun 2014 #3

The perpetrators' names aren't Muslimy enough to rile up their viewership toddwv Jun 2014 #4

Its better they not cover it. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Jun 2014 #7

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)

1. No, they are talking about Hilary, Bergdahl, and Tracy Morgan.

Reply to kimbutgar (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:04 PM

Jun 2014

Nothing on the shooting.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

2. Shooting? What shooting?

Reply to kimbutgar (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:12 PM

Jun 2014

Oh {yawn} another lone wolf, no connection to anything (except maybe Benghazi!), random act, nobody could have foreseen, everybody's at fault (except conservatives and especially except Fox), you know who the REAL mass killers are, shooting? That one?

malaise

(268,695 posts)

6. +1,000 n/t

Reply to gratuitous (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:41 PM

Jun 2014

Xipe Totec

(43,888 posts)

3. Covering it does not begin to describe it. More like burying it. nt

Reply to kimbutgar (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 06:19 PM

Jun 2014

toddwv

(2,830 posts)

4. The perpetrators' names aren't Muslimy enough to rile up their viewership

Reply to kimbutgar (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 07:45 PM

Jun 2014

so I'm going to guess that they will be running the tagline that this is all just another "wag the dog" ploy to take Muricans' attention off of Benghazi.

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)

5. Its better they not cover it.

Reply to kimbutgar (Original post)

Mon Jun 9, 2014, 08:09 PM

Jun 2014

If they did, they'd claim the shooters were democrats.

Response to kimbutgar (Original post)

Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.

Reply to this discussion