Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

elleng

(130,773 posts)
1. No, and thanks,
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 10:34 PM
Jun 2014

this is one of those memes that bugs me now, and always has.

I posted recently to this effect: I'm an attorney, my husband, father, and cousin were attorneys, my brother's an attorney, and we DO OUR JOBS. (Andrea Mitchell's another, assuming she's a 'clone' of that guy she married - for reasons beyond my understanding!!!)

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
4. Wouldn't it be extremely self-defeating for her to do so when history
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 11:00 PM
Jun 2014

looks back on Bill's tenure so kindly?

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
3. Nobody assumes that. Bill isn't as hawkish, and never hung out with The Family.
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 10:37 PM
Jun 2014

He's also an infinitely better campaigner.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
5. She doesn't have to be a "clone" for him to be a problem
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:22 AM
Jun 2014

It's naive to believe that Bill Clinton would not be more involved with the policy aspects of a Hillary Clinton presidency than any other presidential spouse has ever been.

Of course he'll try to stick his nose in. He had the job for eight years and he thinks he's smarter than everybody else to begin with. There's no way he's not going to be involved. Of course she doesn't have to listen, but he won't give up without a fight.

If Hillary hires enough interns to keep him occupied, she might be able to get something done without him telling her how to do everything.

unblock

(52,126 posts)
6. true, but we're not exactly talking carville and matalin here....
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:35 AM
Jun 2014

and of course, bill clinton wouldn't be bill clinton today, either. that is, if he were to get a third term (not gonna happen, of course), he would be a rather different president than he was in his first two terms. he's learned a lot, and the times have changed. i actually think he'd be remarkably effective. the combative skills he learned in his second term would be most useful against today's republicans.

in any event, of course, hillary is her own person with her own skills and flaws and she would have to make her own decisions. that said, the clintons have always been a team, and have mostly seemed on the same page -- mostly. so i wouldn't expect radical policy differences simply because it's hillary and not bill with the title. some differences will emerge because she has different priorities, but i suspect that most of the differences would be better attributed to the changing times.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
7. No we are in many ways opposites
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:37 AM
Jun 2014

But we are best friends regardless.

They have been trying to hang Bill (One of the most successful presidents in history) around her neck since he left office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you a clone of your s...