General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGun Control Is Going Nowhere, So Here's a Bulletproof Blanket for Your Kid
http://bodyguardblanket.com/index.html
One way to curb mass shootings in America's schools would be for Congress to pass gun control legislation. But since that plan failed miserably, an enterprising father in Oklahoma is offering another solutionequipping children with bulletproof blankets.
The Bodyguard Blanket was developed by Steve Walker, a father of two elementary school students who was horrified by the December 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, which left 20 children and six adults dead. In the 14 months following Newtown, there were at least 44 school shootings. "We wanted our children to have a layer of protection immediately," Walker told Oklahoma NBC affiliate KFOR. "They can be stored in the classroom, and, when seconds count, they can be easily applied."
It comes in both child and adult sizes and is designed to be bulletproof, made from the same materials that US soldiers and law enforcement wear, the manufacturer's website claims. The manufacturers estimate that the blankets provide protection against "90% of all weapons that have been used in school shootings in the United States."
The blanket is intended to be strapped on a child's back like a backpack. When the child crouches in a ball and huddles up next to other children, they form a kind of human shield, like how the "Romans and the Greeks used to lock together," managing partner Stan Schone told KFOR. (The blanket is also being marketed toward schools that might want to protect students from tornado-induced flying debris.)
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/06/mass-shootings-blanket-children-guns
Leme
(1,092 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)statementofgoods
(68 posts)Pretty good idea and much better than the bullet proof back pack that was marketed to schools.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)A few problems. A) all that velocity doesn't just disappear. While it might prevent puncture wounds from bullets hitting it head on, kids are still going to take blunt force trauma, and kids, being smaller, are hurt more than adults by the same amount of damage. B) It's unidirectional protection. bullets ricochet, and some fragment when they hit something. Looking at the pictures of those kids lying there, if I were a nutcase shooter, I'd simply fire right at where the the floor is and let the ricochets chew them up.
If you want to turn schools into armed camps, you'd be better off investing in bulletproof glass and doors and dividers that can lock down sections of the building such that a shooter simply either can't get in, or can immediately be trapped in one small section and prevented from leaving.
Better yet, of course, would be getting guns off the streets, so that would be mass murderers have to try it with knives or bats.
statementofgoods
(68 posts)during a tornado drill or an active shooter .
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)I wasn't sure how I felt about this at first, but reading that it was developed by a Newtown parent put it into a new light. Another layer of protection really can't hurt. We already have buzzers, mousetrap entries, safety drills, etc.
I think it might scare the younger children, though. I would probably tell them it was for a tornado drill instead of a potential shooting event.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The Bodyguard Blanket was developed by Steve Walker, a father of two elementary school students who was horrified by the December 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, which left 20 children and six adults dead.
He's a guy with two elementary aged kids who was horrified by Newtown.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Read it wrong.
At $1000 a blanket, he stands to make quite a bit of money. Maybe he would consider donating a portion to some worthy cause.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)to read it the way you did.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)And it says a lot about the state of our nation today.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)A retreat to 1950's cold war ignorance that prepares kids to wait to be slaughtered while mistakenly believing they're doing something to keep themselves safe?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)hatrack
(59,578 posts)Y'know, with a rifle barrel or the shooter's foot.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)statementofgoods
(68 posts)to every school in the country. It takes machinery to buy , employees to hire etc...
Response to statementofgoods (Reply #16)
packman This message was self-deleted by its author.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)they are exploiting the market of fear. It's wrong to profit from human misery.
Those goofy things won't do shit to make anybody safe beyond the CEO of the company's bank account.
It won't stop a rifle round. Soldiers in the field wear body armor that weighs almost as much as a child. A pistol round fired at such protection in front of a block of clay will leave a dent in it the size of your fist. For a child that kind of blunt force trauma is enough to kill them or cripple them for life.
In the event of an active shooter all those things (that suspiciously resemble sleeping mats for naptime) will be piled in a cloak room somewhere. Imagine twenty kids clamoring to don body armor all at once under fire.
They only offer protection along one axis. The child will have to keep the protection between him/her and the shooter. That will be difficult to do while face down and blind because of the "protection". The shooter could easily outflank them with a few steps around his targets cowering on the floor. It creates a kill zone for the shooter. And don't forget ricochets that can bounce under it and are just as deadly.
I'm sorry if I seem too strident here. I just hate it when corporate assholes indulge in this kind of profiteering. If that sonofabitch wants to sell those things, let him put one on and try to survive an active shooter. This kind of shit is straight out of the nineteenth century. Upton Sinclair is spinning in his grave by now.
kag
(4,078 posts)I like to believe that the creator of these horrible things had good intentions, but the truth is they won't do anything except waste precious money that schools need for real education, and perhaps give some a false sense of security about surviving a newtown-like incident.
Meanwhile the manufacturer is laughing all the way to the bank, profiting on the FUD that our society is allowing itself to suffer.
It breaks my heart.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)is to simply allow prayer and bring God back to the school, because - you know - that works. Bibles for the Kids, maybe with a bullet-proof cover.
That being said, the biggest buyer of these are going to be the Bundy Ranch crowd with visions of crouching behind their portable bunkers firing at law enforcement people.
smallcat88
(426 posts)but truly sad we've come to this point. When the right to carry a gun becomes more important than the right of children to live we need to stop calling America a great country.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)"Hold on, there's a shooter... Let's all grab our Kevlar shields!"
What the hell has this world gotten to that this is seen as a sane, rational course of action??
Or do they wear them all the time?
Maybe they make one for the front to wear at the same time?
A vest alone weights about 15lbs... full body armor... what? 45lbs for the back? On a child that weighs 75-100lbs max?
How about we solve the actual problem instead of resorting to snake oil salesmen?
Leme
(1,092 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)Leme
(1,092 posts)Leme
(1,092 posts)Takket
(21,528 posts)Acknowledging that this is a good idea is also acknowledging that there is a violence problem in schools, which leads to the next question, if you believe there is a problem, why do you feel nothing should be done about guns?
Response to KittyWampus (Original post)
InfoWingerWatch This message was self-deleted by its author.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I wish like hell I could leave this country