Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
143 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No matter how much some people here dislike the idea, Hillary WILL be the Democratic nominee (Original Post) MoonRiver Jun 2014 OP
Uh....2008 Callled....It wants its prediction back (nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #1
And who is the next Barack Obama to challenge her? MoonRiver Jun 2014 #3
Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley snooper2 Jun 2014 #12
Won't run against her... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #17
We don't know till we know! I think he would be a great pres. from what I have read snooper2 Jun 2014 #28
I know he won't.....he is not like that... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #31
Actually, I have some inside sources... brooklynite Jun 2014 #60
Yeah to get the VP many will consider a friendly campaign.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #62
Oooh - I love when you show up! JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #85
He's already running. n/t FSogol Jun 2014 #109
yeah..in the running for VP VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #115
That Obama fellow wasn't considered credible at one time... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #24
The Obama fellow was quietly getting organized this time eight years ago... brooklynite Jun 2014 #63
Actually, no.... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #113
Sure. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2014 #2
There's nobody around who is a credible challenge. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #6
The process hasn't even started. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2014 #9
Obama was definitely on everybody's radar screen at this point. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #15
Not so much. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2014 #33
pick a name out of a hat and you got a credible challenge. Whisp Jun 2014 #80
So why not just ignore those of us who cannot stand her? djean111 Jun 2014 #4
Winning is all that matters, and that we hate the other side Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #18
Amen. Pathetic, innit? djean111 Jun 2014 #45
yup Marrah_G Jun 2014 #51
Yes because that alternative is extremely distasteful.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #79
The prize is getting a bit tattered and shabby. djean111 Jun 2014 #89
It's her's if she wants it underpants Jun 2014 #5
yep n/t MoonRiver Jun 2014 #7
I'm here in 2014, trying to elect a Dem governor for my state. Why don't you join us in the here ScreamingMeemie Jun 2014 #8
Amazingly enough, I'm able to do both. brooklynite Jun 2014 #66
Because the Left is frothing at the mouth at the possibility of a Hillary nomination. Beacool Jun 2014 #110
The RW zipplewrath Jun 2014 #120
I'm not so sure. Beacool Jun 2014 #130
compare populations zipplewrath Jun 2014 #134
So from this post we can deduce LondonReign2 Jun 2014 #138
Counting the chickens before they hatch is foolish. Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #10
Well you just saved me a ton of time, thanks. Savannahmann Jun 2014 #11
If she is I will drop my affiliation with the Democratic Party Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #13
I'm an Independent, but I support Hillary. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #21
Who will you vote for if she's not the nominee? ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2014 #34
Whomever is the nominee, of course. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #44
That is nice I will not and I will stop voting for all Democrats too Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #41
Ciao! FSogol Jun 2014 #117
Toodle Ouuuwww... lumpy Jun 2014 #121
I am sure they will miss you.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #23
They will miss the money I donate that is about it Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #47
How much do you donate? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #52
Between 10 and 20k per election cycle Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #56
you're saying you donate between 10,000 and 20,000 per election cycle and you say "not much"? CreekDog Jun 2014 #136
Oh I get calls but have been telling the DNC to FO for a number of years now Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #137
you're saying you donate between $10,000 and $20,000 per cycle? CreekDog Jun 2014 #141
I do I am just very particular as to whom I donate too Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #142
It will add up, because it will be MANY of us. n/t Dawgs Jun 2014 #57
Well 69% of Democrats already support the candidate backed by Goldman Sachs Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #64
Sour grapes? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #67
Not worried. She won't be the nominee. n/t Dawgs Jun 2014 #69
You keep telling yourself that.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #78
No. I'm telling you that. Dawgs Jun 2014 #87
and I said Bless your heart. VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #88
No. I don't. Dawgs Jun 2014 #92
I don't think she will either. Raksha Jun 2014 #124
No sour grapes just stating what I and some others will do Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #71
Please do..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #72
Just like I said nobody will care and as you point out my vote nor donations are needed Exposethefrauds Jun 2014 #76
I like how it looks from here frankly! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #77
More than the 69% will? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #65
You realize 69% isn't that great, right? n/t Dawgs Jun 2014 #70
You realize 69% at this point is unheard of....right? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #81
At this point any number is meaningless. Dawgs Jun 2014 #90
says the guy who cannot commit to voting for whomever the Democrats select..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #91
That doesn't even make any sense. Dawgs Jun 2014 #94
Of course you don't VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #96
And of course you do.. n/t Dawgs Jun 2014 #98
Yes I do....I AM a Democrat.. VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #102
No. I'm not a Democrat. Dawgs Jun 2014 #104
100% of the population doesn't know everything about any politician. That is why we have been lumpy Jun 2014 #123
I'm sure he doesn't donate as much as Goldman Sachs. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2014 #59
That's OK. Beacool Jun 2014 #111
Well, if that's true, then she obviously doesn't need Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #14
Then most of what people come to DU to talk about is pointless FiveGoodMen Jun 2014 #16
it seems so very corporate and republican to push shit down our throats 2pooped2pop Jun 2014 #19
You're right - we should give up now. Thanks for informing us. el_bryanto Jun 2014 #20
If you have a credible alternative in mind, let me know. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #25
Because that is what corporate media wants you to see. Marrah_G Jun 2014 #54
The last time, this sort of inevitable proclamation lead to Hillary supporters Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #108
Excellent point! The OP can only hurt any non-Hillary candidate who wins the nomination. Jim Lane Jun 2014 #133
You're probably right but I'm still gonna whine and complain tularetom Jun 2014 #22
Do you whine and complain now? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #82
And the purpose of this thread would be...? tkmorris Jun 2014 #26
What are Saturdays Powerball numbers? liberal N proud Jun 2014 #27
candidate maybe...president doubtful bowens43 Jun 2014 #29
oh lawd.... Cali_Democrat Jun 2014 #30
Is there ANY point to this post?? HERVEPA Jun 2014 #32
My calendar read 2006 nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #35
lol - how much you wanna bet she won't even be the nominee? cbdo2007 Jun 2014 #36
And once again I will be forced to hold my nose and carry a barf bag when voting. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #37
of course. people love it when decisions are shoved down their throats....... /nt think Jun 2014 #38
Stop guessing or trying to sell a fraudulent inevitability intaglio Jun 2014 #39
is there a shit stirring smilie? 2pooped2pop Jun 2014 #40
Sorry, IMO if Hillary is the nominee we will lose PumpkinAle Jun 2014 #42
It can. Agschmid Jun 2014 #43
She will be our nominee and win the race. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #46
blah blah blah blah Marrah_G Jun 2014 #48
I am so happy with our Democratic Party, we have several very viable possible candidates available. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #49
I'm not getting on that train. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #50
sad to say, no one's health is guaranteed for two years Leme Jun 2014 #53
Well, if it's as inevitable as you say... vi5 Jun 2014 #55
That's right LordGlenconner Jun 2014 #83
Probably, and probably not, respectively. Your certainty, however, is completely unjustified. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2014 #58
certainty, however, is completely unjustified Leme Jun 2014 #61
That's the kind of talk that alienated tons of primary voters last time around. Iggo Jun 2014 #68
Hillary will not be the next candidate and will never be president Michigander_Life Jun 2014 #73
There's a problem with the amount of baggage she's carrying on that unstoppable train. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #74
I love torturing my RW wing friends with 3 lil' words GusBob Jun 2014 #75
and your left-wing friends too Laughing Mirror Jun 2014 #97
You know what we will do if HRC is the nominee? Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #119
Only your RW friends? Beacool Jun 2014 #107
James Carville, is that you??? nt Skidmore Jun 2014 #84
It is, and he's brought Madame Cleo and her crystal ball! n/t BuelahWitch Jun 2014 #99
The only thing that was/is inevitable was the talk of her inevitability. Broward Jun 2014 #86
I agree with you. And won't DU be a fun place then...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #93
I've seen this movie ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #95
I'm pretty sure the winner of the primaries will be the nominee. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #100
Good luck with that ... 1000words Jun 2014 #101
Probably true The Road Runner Jun 2014 #103
Thats what was being said in 2006. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #105
To which they answer: Yeah, but there's nobody good running this time. Iggo Jun 2014 #106
More cow manure from the inevitability crowd. N/T BlueStater Jun 2014 #112
If that happens, I'm gone LittleBlue Jun 2014 #114
Bingo! vi5 Jun 2014 #125
I seem to recall hearing very much the same thing Crunchy Frog Jun 2014 #116
Let me PowerToThePeople Jun 2014 #118
That's the great thing about being an independent. I am not beholden to any candidate. liberal_at_heart Jun 2014 #122
Hillary Clinton is the only Democratic candidate who could be Texas in play Gothmog Jun 2014 #126
Wasn't that the same song playing in '08? The inevitability meme failed then, seems less likely now. peacebird Jun 2014 #127
The only one that could possibly beat her standingtall Jun 2014 #131
you want excitement? MFM008 Jun 2014 #128
Thank you for the post. Travis_0004 Jun 2014 #129
She won't run: she likes being a private citizen struggle4progress Jun 2014 #132
Awesome, saved me massive amounts of time. Now I don't have to donate, talk to neighbors, Katashi_itto Jun 2014 #135
Here's the problem: Hillary has as much charisma and is as likable as... cherokeeprogressive Jun 2014 #139
Yeah, sure......... Beacool Jun 2014 #143
I do somewhat agree with your opinion. NCTraveler Jun 2014 #140

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
3. And who is the next Barack Obama to challenge her?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:29 PM
Jun 2014

And please don't insinuate that the clown car has a credible candidate.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
31. I know he won't.....he is not like that...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:40 PM
Jun 2014

And I also think he will make an excellent President....but he won't run against the first female President.

brooklynite

(94,353 posts)
60. Actually, I have some inside sources...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:53 PM
Jun 2014

...who say he'll run a "friendly" campaign against her (angling for VP?)

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
24. That Obama fellow wasn't considered credible at one time...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jun 2014

As to who might be next? Just because you claim to be able to predict the future doesn't mean that I'm going there.

brooklynite

(94,353 posts)
63. The Obama fellow was quietly getting organized this time eight years ago...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:54 PM
Jun 2014

...lining up political and financial committments. Warren and Sanders? Not so much.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
113. Actually, no....
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jun 2014

When Obama made his announcement in 2007 (not 2006) he was only about three months removed from the start of serious campaign organizing. And remember that at that time, Obama was largely the third choice behind Hillary and John Edwards (remember him?).

Eighteen months is an eternity in electoral politics.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,867 posts)
9. The process hasn't even started.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jun 2014

Obama wasn't a "credible challenge" either. Remember how this whole thing was "a big fairy-tale"?

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
15. Obama was definitely on everybody's radar screen at this point.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

Only one who has even made a squeak or two is Joe Biden. And we all know how likely he is to win. Well, there's also Bernie Sanders, who I love, but he won't ever win the nomination, much less the general.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,867 posts)
33. Not so much.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:41 PM
Jun 2014

He was known but it was still Hillary's to lose (and boy did she ever). Obama wasn't seen as a real threat until after he kicked her ass in Iowa.


But by all means, attempt to re-write history to fit your point. It's the internet, you can say whatever you want.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
80. pick a name out of a hat and you got a credible challenge.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:09 PM
Jun 2014

Hillary has so many skeletons and misspeaks and misspokes and foots in mouth and misdeeds and wrong decisions anyone with some guts to go against The Machine could win it.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. So why not just ignore those of us who cannot stand her?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:29 PM
Jun 2014

The thought of Corporate Hillary fills me with despair.
It will never fill me with any enthusiasm whatsoever.
Oh, and I was a Hillary supporter the first time she tried for the post, and failed - and then I found out what corporate and Third Way means.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
18. Winning is all that matters, and that we hate the other side
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

That is enough for a vast majority here. HC could govern just like a republican would and they wouldnt know the difference and call her the 2nd best president next to President Obama. The corporate takeover of independent and critical thinking and adherence to principals is complete.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
8. I'm here in 2014, trying to elect a Dem governor for my state. Why don't you join us in the here
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:31 PM
Jun 2014

and now? *trash thread*

brooklynite

(94,353 posts)
66. Amazingly enough, I'm able to do both.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:56 PM
Jun 2014

I working to get a lot of Democrats elected, but i still have time to actively enourage my preferred candidates to get ready for 2016.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
110. Because the Left is frothing at the mouth at the possibility of a Hillary nomination.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:07 PM
Jun 2014

I have no idea who dislikes her more, if the RW or the LW.

As for 2014, you have it right. I'm afraid that we might lose the Senate, but around here it's all about bashing Hillary 24/7.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
120. The RW
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 03:30 PM
Jun 2014

I can guarantee that the RW hates her more. The LW will end up voting for her. The RW never would.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
130. I'm not so sure.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:46 PM
Jun 2014

I have read more than one comment here stating that they won't vote for her no matter what.



zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
134. compare populations
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 12:26 PM
Jun 2014

Compare the population size of the RW that won't vote for HRC and the size of the LW that won't vote for Hillary and get back to me on which side is larger, and what the ratio of the two is. It will be double digit integers.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
11. Well you just saved me a ton of time, thanks.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jun 2014

Now I don't have to donate, or talk to neighbors, or take shifts at phone banks, because it's inevitable, and can't be stopped. Thanks, I can sit out the Presidential Election and focus on the other races. I appreciate that, you took a lot of work off my plate mate.

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
13. If she is I will drop my affiliation with the Democratic Party
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

Not like it will matter anyway but I will feel better doing so.

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
41. That is nice I will not and I will stop voting for all Democrats too
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jun 2014

And leave DU too
If I support a group I support the group if I don't support it I will have nothing to do with it

If the Democratic Party wants to be a corporate party good on them I just won't have anything to do with it

Yes I will enjoy president (insert RW name here)





 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
52. How much do you donate?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:48 PM
Jun 2014

Cause I kind of think they won't miss that either....she has 69% of Democrats supporting her...

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
136. you're saying you donate between 10,000 and 20,000 per election cycle and you say "not much"?
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:30 PM
Jun 2014

and you don't think it will be noticed?

another post from you.

what's the word i'm supposed to blurt out right about now?

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
137. Oh I get calls but have been telling the DNC to FO for a number of years now
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:42 PM
Jun 2014

I will not support ANY CORPORATE candidate and yes that includes the Pres. He got nada well he did get a my vote in 08

But it no longer matters the
DU Brain Trust has said my vote, money and support are not needed and I am am idiot to boot

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
141. you're saying you donate between $10,000 and $20,000 per cycle?
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:46 PM
Jun 2014

or are you backing away from that claim?

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
142. I do I am just very particular as to whom I donate too
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:55 PM
Jun 2014

Lately more money has been going to charities, few pols worth supporting with my money now days. I also do not donate out of my state. If it were up to me money donateded to candidates can only come from state residents.

But hey I am an idiot so it does not matter

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
64. Well 69% of Democrats already support the candidate backed by Goldman Sachs
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:56 PM
Jun 2014

So our money and votes do no matter

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
67. Sour grapes?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:56 PM
Jun 2014

You know you COULD start your own party and run your own candidate with all that money you will be saving on Hillary!

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
87. No. I'm telling you that.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jun 2014

It's what happens when I respond to someone. I tell them how I feel.

Don't you?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
88. and I said Bless your heart.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:18 PM
Jun 2014

Even if she doesn't I don't threaten to take my dollies and go home....I vote for whomever my fellow Democrats select.

Don't you?

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
92. No. I don't.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jun 2014

I vote for the best candidate. Most of the time it's the lesser of two evils, and almost always a Democrat.

Raksha

(7,167 posts)
124. I don't think she will either.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jun 2014

There are just too many progressives who are less than enthusiastic about her, to put it mildly. I'm one of them. If Hillary is the Dem nominee I will vote third party like I did in 2012. I have said it before and I'll say it again: NO WAY will I vote for that corporatist warmonger.

Sooner or later the Democratic establishment is going to have to admit that it can't win without the progressive vote. Not the centrist-moderate-independent vote but the PROGRESSIVE vote. We are, as we have always been, the base of the Democratic Party, and without us they have nothing.

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
71. No sour grapes just stating what I and some others will do
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jun 2014

I could start my own party like you said or support socialist candidates instead of corporate candidates

 

Exposethefrauds

(531 posts)
76. Just like I said nobody will care and as you point out my vote nor donations are needed
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jun 2014

Looks like you got it in the bag now

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
90. At this point any number is meaningless.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:19 PM
Jun 2014

And with 100% of the population knowing everything about her, it's not that great. IMHO.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
91. says the guy who cannot commit to voting for whomever the Democrats select.....
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jun 2014

Not very Democratic of you....

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
96. Of course you don't
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:21 PM
Jun 2014

Bless your heart...

You do understand that one of those "labels" is on this very site? This is Democratic Underground....Not I don't vote for labels underground

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
104. No. I'm not a Democrat.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jun 2014

I don't use labels.

Apparently they're okay for you, even if the candidate is right of Nixon.

Now, I will happily vote for the Democrat Elizabeth Warren, as she actually acts like one.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
123. 100% of the population doesn't know everything about any politician. That is why we have been
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jun 2014

saddled with shitty leaders.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
16. Then most of what people come to DU to talk about is pointless
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

The world will become fascist.

Go back to your homes. Face it; nothing worthwhile can be done. (MoonRiver says so)

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
19. it seems so very corporate and republican to push shit down our throats
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

like this. Don't cha think, we the people, ought to make a decision or two? You are just reminding us that we have no voice. Thanks. I give up. No need to vote then right?

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
20. You're right - we should give up now. Thanks for informing us.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Jun 2014

Think of all the time we would have wasted disagreeing with Hillary and working for other candidates - now we can dedicate ourselves to supporting Hillary.

I'm sure that's what will happen.

bryant

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
108. The last time, this sort of inevitable proclamation lead to Hillary supporters
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:06 PM
Jun 2014

getting completely bent out of shape when she didn't win. It is stupid. Please stop. Please do support your candidate, just stop with the "it's inevitable" crap. Unless of course your intention is to divide and destroy our party, then keep it up, way to go!

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
133. Excellent point! The OP can only hurt any non-Hillary candidate who wins the nomination.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 03:54 AM
Jun 2014

I'll add that this kind of thinking also hurts Hillary if she's the nominee. Those of us who would rather see a progressive nominee will back a Sanders or O'Malley or someone else, and then, if Hillary wins anyway after a fair fight (and I agree she'll be the favorite if she runs), most of us will support her in the general.

The main fly in the ointment would be if we feel that the corporate media and the party establishment have rigged the game. The best way to discourage progressives from voting for Hillary in November is to leave us with the impression that she didn't win the nomination in a fair fight.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
22. You're probably right but I'm still gonna whine and complain
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jun 2014

She has one thing going for her that Obama never had - low expectations. Yeah she'll be elected president but she won't make the changes needed to move the country in the right direction or help the middle class.

The only good thing about her is that the wing nuts hate her guts, even considering all she has done to align herself with Wall Street and the Pentagon.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
26. And the purpose of this thread would be...?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jun 2014

To rub people's nose in it? Short-circuit any discussion about other potential nominees? Point and laugh? What are we doing here?

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
29. candidate maybe...president doubtful
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:38 PM
Jun 2014

if she is the candidate, we will be in a lose lose situation.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
36. lol - how much you wanna bet she won't even be the nominee?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jun 2014

It's a numbers game and statistically Hillary has the numbers against her.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
39. Stop guessing or trying to sell a fraudulent inevitability
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jun 2014

There are several viable candidates: Gov. Sebellius, Gov. O'Malley, perhaps even Sen. Warren - though she has declared she will not run.

Let the runners declare first, remember that no-one gave President Obama a second thought when he declared and then remember the massive negatives that accompany any run by Mrs Clinton.

PumpkinAle

(1,210 posts)
42. Sorry, IMO if Hillary is the nominee we will lose
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jun 2014

there are many who dislike her just because of her name. Once the propaganda machine really gets rolling she will be done and the GOPT will walk home.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
49. I am so happy with our Democratic Party, we have several very viable possible candidates available.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:47 PM
Jun 2014

I was for Hillary before and will be again, we have a wonderful pool to select a VP, I feel good about many of them. If I was a Republican, I would be wondering who do we have who can top Hillary, right now, no one.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
55. Well, if it's as inevitable as you say...
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 12:50 PM
Jun 2014

Then she won't need my support, my time, my money, or my vote.

Good to hear.

 

Michigander_Life

(549 posts)
73. Hillary will not be the next candidate and will never be president
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:02 PM
Jun 2014

The logic and reality is that Hillary is a terrible candidate. She was leading in 2006, too. Remember that?

But then people actually got to see her in debates and in the campaign and she sunk like a stone. Because she's a terrible candidate.

The only differences between 2006 and 2014 are Hillary is 8 years older and has 8 more years of baggage. Oh, and she's already a proven loser.

We need a NEW, FRESH and PROGRESSIVE democratic presidential candidate. Hillary is none of those things.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
119. You know what we will do if HRC is the nominee?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:49 PM
Jun 2014

We will be out there donating, calling, knocking, and otherwise supporting, as we always do.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
100. I'm pretty sure the winner of the primaries will be the nominee.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:24 PM
Jun 2014

These kinds of proclamations are nonsense and divisive.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
114. If that happens, I'm gone
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jun 2014

I cast my final vote for the lesser of evils in 2012, and vowed to never do it again in my life. Let the Clintons find their votes among the 1%.

At that point I'll go indy and never look back. "But but but"-- nope, don't care.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
125. Bingo!
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:07 PM
Jun 2014

Perfectly encapsulated my feelings on the matter. Especially the "But, but, but...." part. Exactly. Save your breath. I've been hearing this for 20+ years now.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
122. That's the great thing about being an independent. I am not beholden to any candidate.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:03 PM
Jun 2014

As far as I'm concerned she can take the hundreds of thousands of dollars she has collected from speaking at bank functions and retire.

Gothmog

(144,921 posts)
126. Hillary Clinton is the only Democratic candidate who could be Texas in play
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:31 PM
Jun 2014

I will wait until after the 2014 races but I have seen the polling that shows that Hillary Clinton could put Texas into play

standingtall

(2,785 posts)
131. The only one that could possibly beat her
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:51 PM
Jun 2014

is Elizabeth Warren. Other than her there is no one close to what Obama was in 08. Obama was already a star after being the keynote speaker in 04.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
128. you want excitement?
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 05:37 PM
Jun 2014

run a horse for the triple crown. I agree with OP. If she wants it its there and PaulCruzBush cant stop her.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
135. Awesome, saved me massive amounts of time. Now I don't have to donate, talk to neighbors,
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 12:39 PM
Jun 2014

Hell I don't even have to vote for her in the primary. Because it's inevitable, and she can't be stopped. To cool!

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
139. Here's the problem: Hillary has as much charisma and is as likable as...
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:42 PM
Jun 2014

Brussels Sprouts.

Put her on TV all day every day and she'll be about as popular as Brussels Sprouts way before the primaries are over.

I'm afraid this train ain't leavin' the station.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
140. I do somewhat agree with your opinion.
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:43 PM
Jun 2014

I do have a little hesitation. That hesitation rests in the fact that I am a big supporter of hers yet I am excited about the possibility of a Warren entering the race. As of right now, my vote in the primaries will go to Warren if she enters the race. This is a vote that did not go for Kucinich or any other dem in the 2008 primary. I would also be open to other fiscal progressives if they entered. As I said in another thread, if it is Hillary, my mother and I will be at the polls with tears of joy in our eyes as we vote for her.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No matter how much some p...