Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:48 PM Jun 2014

Some notes on recently having a right wing house guest for a few days

Last edited Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:47 PM - Edit history (1)

But first a little background is necessary: I've known this person for about 15 years and he's a mutual friend of mine and some others near me due to common interests and we get together for certain events every year or so. Back when we first met I was then a moderate republican but I often tried to forestall political talk in the name of keeping peace. Though he's a right wing ideologue, he basically thinks I am on his side politically but I just don't express it enough, or with enough enthusiasm. This ruse worked for years even as I drifted left as he did even further to the right. Anyway, he was in the area for an event, and as he's most certifiably a member of the working poor ( or poor-ish ) and as I have an extra guest room I offered it instead of spending money on a motel.

The reason I brought all this up was to say that knowing that, make clear my ability to counter his RW bullshit as a "concern troll". He does know I'm much more well read than him and does often defer to my knowledge, especially since he thinks I'm basically conservative. He does know however, that I'm a unionized blue collar worker and that I am not on the GOP's side in regards to that. I sensed an opportunity to plant seed of RW doubt. It did work I think, but was frustrating too.

A few observations of this guest's views, and boy is he one brainwashed dude:

Anti-government everything, except the military. Absolutely buys the notion that everything but that should be privatized. He deliberately spouted out loud ( with the intention of being overheard ) in public every time something didn't go smoothly. "Yeah..Looks like this place is run by the GOVERNMENT!". "This is what you get when GOVERNMENT gets involved!" etc. He gets stopped by a traffic light: "I'll bet a DEMOCRAT" put this light up!".

Believes absolutely that the economic crash and basically bad economy was caused solely by sub-prime mortgages to low income people. As I explained the housing/credit bubble ( and other bubbles ) he seemed amazed. Seriously; he literally leaned forward to take in my explanation. It's like it's the first time he's ever even heard of the concept of a "bubble". I underscored this by saying the loss of good working class jobs and it's resultant negative effect on the economy was briefly masked due to credit. again he seemed amazed. I knew damned well he gets his "news" from Fox and Rush Limbaugh, but I resisted mentioning it so as not to blow my cover, so to speak. Seeds of doubt no-doubt sowed.

Said something that blew my mind: That the apparent need for the acquisition of every electronic gadget or product is "pushed on us by the liberal media" and tried to tie it to the "the poor today have it so good with their cell phones, TV's...." etc canard. I confronted him directly, as in "you gotta be fucking shitting me" As in, "do you mean to tell me it isn't corporate PR bullshit to push all this stuff on us? If anything it's business friendly conservative handiwork". My bluntness stunned him and he conceded....much like a disgruntled 5 year old would when he learns he has to eat his vegetables before he can have cake.

Sarah Palin is smarter than Barack Obama. Again, I played it like I wasn't exactly the president's biggest fan, but come on! She's an airhead and utterly unqualified to be quoted, let alone a vice-president. More grumbling. He basically dug in and said, in as many words, that she's smart and he's dumb because she's a republican and he's a democrat, and that's that. He said to me ( knowing I have some interest in guns/recreational shooting ) "Did you know she's a member of the EN - ARE - AY?" "Yes, and I don't give a shit". "You don't"? ( flatly/deadpan ) "No....I don't". ( incredulously ) "HHHMMMM!"

The last, and most frustrating: Hates hates hates labor unions, and has an extraordinarily parochial pro-business view. Constantly bashed unions and still does so loudly and at every opportunity, like he does the government. All the more bizarre since he works for low pay for a shitheel employer ( which he complains about ) but somehow thinks it's his duty to just plug along sullenly for "the man". I don't get it at all....Or do I? I know in his home town there is a large and unionized industrial plant and he's constantly bashing the place, well the unions and the employees in general. He said he even hopes the place shuts down! My guess is he tried to hire on but was rejected his anti-labor origination, which he probably thought would be a plus, but in reality would just brand him as a troublemaker to management. Either that, or he had an ugly run-in with the union or some employees. This is the one issue I had the hardest time moving him off. He seemed unfazed when I gave lots of examples of unionized companies that are doing financially very well, and that the good wages are a good influence on the economy..and plenty of examples of non-union business that suck.

OK, one more: Though he's not at all a fundamentalist or evangelical type, he's really big on spouting the "christian nation" BS and hatred of anything muslim, hell, ANYthing middle-eastern at all. Question he asked: "Do you think there's a place for christianity in this country?" "Sure....as far as I know no christians are barred from practicing their religion". "Ummmm, I meant, is there a place for it?" "Whaddya mean? Yeah, there's a place for it provided it has zero influence on outside the home or church itself". "So, you're OK with the muslims taking over?" "How the hell is not wanting a christian theocracy the same as having some muslim caliphate take over?" "You don't think they are a problem?" "I don't like muslims or anybody that blows shit up and kill people, but no, I have no problem with the existence of them as such". ( incredulously ) "HHHMMM!". I used my authoritative sounding "you must be an idiot if you believe that shit" tone, but was not directly insulting. More of a "please don't make me think you're an ignorant jackass" tone.

In closing can sum up that I know i planted some seeds of doubt but what really puzzled me was the disconnect between his socioeconomic station and who he supports politically. this is NOT some "fellow traveler" type who purports to support an issue just to avoid admitting he's really after a single social issue, like so many others who do. All that right wing trickle-down BS,..he really really believes it.

Sorry for the length, I wanted to be complete in my description of the experience. Though frustrating, I knew I got further than if I would have "come clean" with just how far to the left of him I am.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
1. One success of RW media is how it projects "attitude" via scorn and derision
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 04:57 PM
Jun 2014

Thus, someone can feel completely confident, even superior, without a single fact to back it up. It's feel-good news, so to speak.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
2. Yes, it's most apparent
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 05:15 PM
Jun 2014

I had no illusions of "flipping" him politically, but rather, my goal was to use cognitive dissonance on him. There were quite a few times it got to the point he realized his position was taken just due to him being a republican/conservative team-player, and not the facts of the issue itself. There's time even he admits Rush Limbaugh distorts stuff via his snarkiness for either comedic effect or to make his point, but he accepts it because he doesn't want to give an inch to the liberals.

Anyway, to that end I know I succeeded. Plant the seeds of doubt, then let empirical evidence do the rest.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
5. Funny, since I learned of it a few years ago, I see evidence of it that much more often
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 05:35 PM
Jun 2014

It really is the smart people that are more full of doubt. The idiots are as cock-sure as ever.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
7. I think the first time I looked up the term I thought: "damn, they actually proved scientifically
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:04 PM
Jun 2014

and defined something that anyone who has ever worked in an organization with more than 3 other people has long suspected." My grandfather used to say "stupid people are too stupid to know how stupid they are" -- same basic idea but since the term got coined the phenomenon has gotten a lot more attention and debate. I love what this business oriented piece recommends to counter it:

1. Use as many measurable standards of performance as possible. Even idiots have a difficult time refuting concrete performance goals.

2. Encourage dissension and debate. This is tough, because if this is not handled properly, it can build a culture of negativity and risk aversion. Your goal shouldn't be to avoid risk, just to expose and understand it.

3. Show confidence in your best employees, even when they don't have confidence in themselves.


http://www.businesspundit.com/why-the-dunning-kruger-effect-is-ruining-your-business/

I think the well thought out comments below that article give an indication of how actively some in business have to work to counter this effect. In my own experience non-profits are far more prone to the ill effects of Dunning Kruger than for profits.

Another theory posits that incompetent people are more likeable than people with mastery, which Harvard summed up in “Competent Jerks, Lovable Fools, and the Formation of Social Networks."
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
4. What's weird about many right wingers is....
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 05:23 PM
Jun 2014

that when you actually engage them on issues, they'll often agree, or concede that you have a point. But they retreat right back to their Rush platitudes.

My longtime best friend has devolved into a Conservative Fundamentalist. We get along great and generically treat out differences with humor.

One time, during the healthcare debate, I remember he was doing the usual riht wing ranting about the government taking over the healthcare system and how bad that was. I explained why I believed that we need public insurance, and the benefits it would have ove the private insurance system we have now.

He actually came to agree with all of the specific points I made. Said it made perfect sense.....But then immediately reverted back to his original position that it was bad because.....well, because it was bad.

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
6. All so true. They'll do that or they'll
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 05:47 PM
Jun 2014

Just move to another completely unrelated issue ( to the one they've just conceded or agreed upon ) and revert back to their "team conservative" mode.

Actually though, it was conceding more and more points that you refer to that was the cause of my political 180 from rep to dem. That and the fact the right went reeeaaalllly right.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
8. I had a similar discussion with a coworker
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:05 PM
Jun 2014

who was raving about the feds taking over healthcare and it should be left up to the states. I said you do realize that the feds do not want to run the exchanges and the gop states refused to set up their own exchanges. He was dumb founded, so then we had to go to the internets to verify this fact.

Aristus

(66,294 posts)
9. Good for you for planting the seeds.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:08 PM
Jun 2014

Trouble is, base on your description of him, there isn't enough fertile soil there to ensure that they will sprout roots.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
12. If I were in your place, I think that next time . . .
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 06:19 PM
Jun 2014

The obnoxious RWer friend would have to find somewhere else to stay.

calimary

(81,139 posts)
13. Bookmarking this to read again.
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 10:37 PM
Jun 2014

Long post but worth studying. But I gotta go find out about eric cantor at the moment!!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some notes on recently ha...