Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: Taken together, libertarianism plus anti-intellectualism equals toxic mix
Paul Krugman on the Surprising Reason Limiting Carbon Emissions Makes Conservatives so AngryWhy, in the face of devastating consequences that are already upon us, is it so hard to take action to curb man-made global warming?
The venerable economist considers the usual suspects, and pretty much discounts them. Instituting emission controls will cause minimal economic harm. Even the anti-science U.S. Chamber of Commerce, try as they might, only found modest costs to carbon reductions. Is it the power of vested interests? he wonders.
Having dispensed with some of the usual suspects, Krugman wonders if the ideology of Ayn Rand libertarianism that is so popular amongst conservative politicians, policy makers and commenters could be at the core of the anger over environmental regulation.
Then there is anti-intellectualism strain that runs through American lifeespecially (but not exclusively?) on the rightthe tendency to believe in conspiracy theories, like the one about how all the world's scientists are in on the gigantic climate hoax, Krugman points out. Taken together, libertarianism plus anti-intellectualism equals toxic mix, or as Krugman concludes.
So the real obstacle, as we try to confront global warming, is economic ideology reinforced by hostility to science. In some ways this makes the task easier: we do not, in fact, have to force people to accept large monetary losses. But we do have to overcome pride and willful ignorance, which is hard indeed.
http://www.alternet.org/economy/paul-krugman-surprising-reason-limiting-carbon-emissions-makes-conservatives-so-angry
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 821 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Taken together, libertarianism plus anti-intellectualism equals toxic mix (Original Post)
pampango
Jun 2014
OP
What he has highlighted as anti-intellectualism in this case looks more like...
Comrade Grumpy
Jun 2014
#2
Tarheel_Dem
(31,222 posts)1. I agree. ALL "libertarians" suck!
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)2. What he has highlighted as anti-intellectualism in this case looks more like...
...the famous "paranoid style" in American politics. The conspiracy theory stuff.
Though there certainly is a long and vibrant strain of anti-intellectualism is American life, which you see even at the level of dorky smart kids being made fun of in school. There's also a lot of that in our politics, but much more on the right than the life, I think (and hope). Climate change denial is one example; stuff like creation science is another.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,741 posts)3. Yep
I don't need none of that fancy pants learnin'