Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,902 posts)
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 12:39 PM Jun 2014

So, given what happened in VA are "open primary" states a good thing or a bad thing?

We have closed primaries in CT. If you are a republican and want to vote in the Democratic Primary, you can only do so if you register as a Democrat. This is what my neighbor does. His reasoning is that since CT is a strong Democratic Party state, it's the only way he can have any influence over who runs against his party in the general election.

What do you think? Would you register Republican if your state was heavily Republican so you could vote for their worst candidate in the primary?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CTyankee

(63,902 posts)
6. ideally, it helps likeminded folks w/o power coalesce and pool resources to work for what works for
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jun 2014

the average person. Strength in numbers.

CTyankee

(63,902 posts)
9. only by fooling their own party.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:13 PM
Jun 2014

Hey, your average republican votes against their own best interests EXCEPT remember that their racism and hatred of poor people is what their party is appealing to. So in a sense, they get their just desserts. It's just too bad that good Dems like us get screwed, too...

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
2. IMHO, it's a bad thing.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 12:54 PM
Jun 2014

Each party should get to pick the person that represents them. What's the point of having a party if, when it comes time to pick the people to represent you, anyone can vote?

If the system is supposed to be intended to give the people the "best" choices to vote for, any system that encourages (or even make it easy for) people to push the worst candidate forward is not a good system.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
4. A good thing if you have a bad party.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jun 2014

As a voter, you would like to think your vote matters. If you live in a State where the other party dominates at every level, what is the point of voting for people who never win? You can select your primary nominee, then get the nominee through the runoff, and then in the general election watch every opposition candidate win, and you end up completely disenfranchised -- you have no elected representation other than someone else's choices.

Even in the opposition party, there are degrees of separation. In the primary and runoffs, your vote can matter. You can affect the outcome. The general -- back to your party -- but you did have something to say in who your elected representatives will be, and who your party candidates ran against.

CTyankee

(63,902 posts)
7. Yup, my neighbor's reasoning. His wife vehemently disagrees...she identifies very strongly as a
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:07 PM
Jun 2014

republican. I can understand that. The idea of becoming a registered republican, even toward a good end, kinda makes me feel sick...

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
10. I wish we had them in PA.
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 01:18 PM
Jun 2014

Rs always win my local elections. I am sick of not having any say in which R it's going to be.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, given what happened i...