Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jun 13, 2014, 09:59 AM Jun 2014

NRA’s “really big problem”: Why it’s dependent on a dwindling fringe

Gun lobby is now reliant on an increasingly radical right-wing sect -- and that spells trouble, an expert explains

ELIAS ISQUITH


During a Tumblr Q&A earlier this week, President Obama said that one of his biggest frustrations since entering the White House has been how “this society has not been willing to take some basic steps” in order to prevent the kinds of mass shootings that have become so horribly prominent as of late. “We’re the only developed country on Earth where this happens,” Obama continued. Speaking of Congress’ inability to buck the NRA and pass even a meager background check bill, Obama said lawmakers should “be ashamed.”

The source of lawmakers’ fear is, of course, the NRA and its massively influential, and feared, lobbying apparatus. Indeed, it’s likely that no organization is as feared in Washington as the NRA, despite the fact that its views — as embodied by the odious Wayne LaPierre — are clearly outside the mainstream and far too close to those usually associated with the kind of right-wing terrorists who recently murdered three people in Las Vegas. Put simply, the NRA is not only abnormally influential, but abnormally extreme, too.

Hoping to learn more about how the NRA has managed to associate itself with dangerous right-wing extremists like the Las Vegas shooters, Salon called up Joshua Sugarmann, executive director and founder of the Violence Policy Center, a pro-gun safety nonprofit that has done extensive work toward exposing the NRA’s diseased politics and the cynical business model that undergirds them. Our conversation can be found below, and has been edited for clarity and length.

What’s your reaction to the recent shootings in Las Vegas as well as Oregon?

I think right now we’re living in America that most people really could not imagine, and the fact that what were once rare events in this country — mass shootings in public spaces — are becoming increasingly common. I think when you look at these issues and you look at the gun debate in this country, we’re reaching a tipping point where to remain a civilized society, we have to do something.

more
http://www.salon.com/2014/06/13/nras_really_big_problem_why_its_dependent_on_a_dwindling_fringe/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRA’s “really big problem”: Why it’s dependent on a dwindling fringe (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2014 OP
We need to make sure and stop calling it "Mass Shootings", that is not what the vast majority of randys1 Jun 2014 #1
Excellent article with a wealth of good information. nt. thucythucy Jun 2014 #2
This is a must read! nt flamin lib Jun 2014 #3

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. We need to make sure and stop calling it "Mass Shootings", that is not what the vast majority of
Fri Jun 13, 2014, 10:05 AM
Jun 2014

these events are.

These are acts of domestic terrorism from rightwing extremists.

Wasnt even Sandy Hook partially like that in the shooter had some rightwing materials at home?

Look, liberals dont shoot people. There is no left wing violence in america and what little we did have was usually bombing an empty building to make a point, going out of the way to make sure innocents werent hurt.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NRA’s “really big problem...