General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMinn. GOP Had No Idea Their Supreme Court Nominee Has DWI Case Pending
Article by: ABBY SIMONS , Star Tribune Updated: June 13, 2014 - 9:13 AM
Only a few knew about Supreme Court candidate Michelle MacDonalds arrest.
Attorney Michelle MacDonald, the GOPs endorsed candidate for the Minnesota Supreme Court, was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving and resisting arrest last year, and her case will head to trialthis fall, during the general election.
State Republican Party Chairman Keith Downey on Thursday said he was unaware of MacDonalds 2013 arrest until notified by a Star Tribune reporter. The revelation comes less than two weeks after party delegates in Rochester endorsed MacDonald to run against Justice David Lillehaug.
None of us, including the convention delegates, were aware of this information about the candidate, Downey said. She, of course, is innocent until proven guilty, but at the same time, the delegates did not have the full disclosure they should have.
He declined to comment on whether the party would withdraw its endorsement. MacDonald, 52, who practices family law, maintains that she was not drinking the night she was pulled over by Rosemount police and is taking the case to trial.
A police report said she refused a field sobriety test and did not take other tests that could have determined her blood-alcohol level.
more
http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/262947921.html?page=all&prepage=1&c=y#continue
SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)graegoyle
(532 posts)"Guns? God? Gays? Greed?"
Nothing else is of import to them.
struggle4progress
(118,236 posts)It is a crime for any person to drive, operate, or be in physical control of any motor vehicle .. when .. the person is under the influence of alcohol ... It is a crime for any person to refuse to submit to a chemical test of the person's blood, breath, or urine under section .. 169A.52 ...
169A.52 TEST REFUSAL OR FAILURE; LICENSE REVOCATION
Upon certification by the peace officer that there existed probable cause to believe the person had been driving, operating, or in physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of section 169A.20 (driving while impaired), and that the person refused to submit to a test, the commissioner shall revoke the person's license or permit to drive, or nonresident operating privilege ... (1) for a person with no qualified prior impaired driving incidents within the past ten years, for a period of not less than one year ...
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)They are in shambles. The Tea Party has destroyed the state Republican Party.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)an anti-choice candidate to run against a moderate, in-office, Republican governor.