General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe knew.
Many, many of us here at DU knew that the Iraq invasion and occupation was folly writ large of the most insane, imperialist kind. We knew, not because we are all Cassandras or because we're all such brilliant analysts or historians of the region, but because it was obvious. All it took to see the ne(oc)on writing on the wall about Iraq, was eyes that were open.
Now here we are, 12 years later. 12 years later and thousands of American lives lost, tens of thousands of American service folks maimed, hundreds of allied lives lost, and hundreds of thousands, possible 1 million+ of Iraqi lives lost to the violence the U.S. unleashed. Here we are after the pallets of American currency have vanished into the pockets of the corrupt in Iraq. Here we are after the war profiteers in this country and elsewhere have richly lined the pockets of their Saville Row tailored suits and walked away into their gated communities. Here we are after the Bush cabal relaxes in retirement or casts blame on President Obama from right wing think tanks.
Here we are.
There's no satisfaction at all in being right in the initial assessment that invading Iraq would be an epic disaster for that country, for the region and for the world at large. It's impossible to feel vindicated or self-righteous in the face of this nightmare.
Some of us never stopped posting about Iraq, noting its narrowing, perilous path and the state of civil war that has effectively dominated the country for the past several years.
I have nothing but sympathy for President Obama. He inherited a mother of a mess from the bush administration and the craven fucks in the republican party. The neocons set all this in motion with their feverish excitement in going to war and intent to remake Iraq as an American territory.
There is something so particularly dreadful in this: Evidence that we don't learn from the past, that the military-industrial complex will never give up the reins of foreign policy and that we set the stage for an unending humanitarian crisis when it was all so eminently avoidable.
Here we are.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)their hubris crowds out critical thinking. I don't think they wanted this, but yes, there are merchants of death who will benefit monetarily.
xocet
(3,871 posts)"They'll greet us as liberators (paraphrased)":
Sunday, September 14, 2003
GUEST: Dick Cheney, Vice President
Tim Russert, Moderator
By NBC News
MR. TIM RUSSERT: Our issues this Sunday: America remembers September 11, 2001. In Iraq, six months ago, the war began with shock and awe. Vice President Dick Cheney appeared on MEET THE PRESS:
(Videotape, March 16):
VICE PRES. DICK CHENEY: My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.
...
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3080244/ns/meet_the_press/t/transcript-sept/#.U5wdNSg1D9s
"It's going to be flowers and sweets (paraphrased):
Sponsored by Benador Associates
March 17, 2003
National Press Club
Washington, DC
...
(QUESTIONER): Vice President Cheney yesterday said that he expects that American forces will be greeted as liberators and I wonder if you could tell us if you agree with that and how you think they'll be greeted and also what you meant you said before that some Iraqi opposition groups might be in Baghdad even before American forces?
KANAN MAKIYA: I most certainly do agree with that. As I told the President on January 10th, I think they will be greeted with sweets and flowers in the first months and simply have very, very little doubts that that is the case.
This is a remarkable situation in which the population of a country that's about to have a war waged over its head positively wants the war while all kinds of other countries don't for one reason or another. That should tell us a lot about this war and about the future (INAUDIBLE) which I think is desufficiently emphasized.
As in regards to what the opposition can do inside the Iraqi cities, its resources are great. There are networks of contacts that have been cultivated over many, many years. We expect that they will be working, they already are, and precisely how and in what ways it would not be wise to go into.
...
https://web.archive.org/web/20040203024404/http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/664
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)Ten years later, a moral architect of the invasion stands by his words.
By Jordan Michael Smith | Globe Correspondent March 17, 2013
The United States officially went to war in Iraq 10 years ago, on March 19, 2003. But in one small sense, the war can be said to have begun in 1989. That was the year a London-based Iraqi architect named Kanan Makiya published a book called Republic of Fear.
Written under the pseudonym Samir al-Khalil, the book offered a devastating inside analysis of Saddam Husseins regime, depicting it as a Middle Eastern version of the totalitarian states that emerged in Europe in the 1920s. Makiya, the son of a prominent Iraqi architect, was living in the West after having worked for his fathers firm and receiving a PhD in architecture from MIT. When Hussein invaded Kuwait the next year and the United States went to war, Republic of Fear became a surprise bestseller; its author went on to become a professor of Islamic and Middle Eastern studies at Brandeis University. And when George W. Bushs administration built the case for the second Iraqi war starting in 2001, it turned to Makiyas book for support once again.
It is difficult to overstate Makiyas intellectual and moral influence on those who forged our position on Iraq over two decades. He appeared frequently in the media as the unofficial spokesman for the Iraqi exile community, a human symbol of what might be possible in a liberated Iraq. He met with Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney in the run-up to the war and worked with Iraqi exile groups to build a post-Hussein Iraq. He was the protagonist of The Assassins Gate, journalist George Packers book on the planning and execution of the Iraq war. As former New Republic editor Peter Beinart wrote, looking back at why he supported the war: For myself, perhaps the most honest reply is this: because Kanan Makiya did.
Today, the landscape is radically different. Iraq as a polity is a failure, Makiya admits from London, where he is on sabbatical, working on a book about the failures of the Iraqi elite. Today, Makiya receives no White House invitations; even by 2007, Beinart wrote of Makiya, I havent seen him, or read anything hes said or written, in several years. Beinarts mournful but devastating assessmentthat Makiya was too idealistic, too sure of American intentions and Iraqi potentialhas come to be the standard view of him among former war supporters.
...
http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2013/03/16/kanan-makiya-regret-about-pressing-war-iraq/k6ZsBxp4sXptfXrcRAocdO/story.html
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)How conveeeenient then was September 11, 2001.
("Idealistic," my Aunt Fanny.)
calimary
(81,139 posts)I think we need to make that a HUGE point. ?YOU guys who want it so bad - YOU go over there and get the party started. YOU do it. YOU first. You missed out last time, and the time before that, and the time before that, too (Vietnam for many of you!). By all means, LEAD THE WAY! Suit up and head on over there! That means YOU, bill kristol. That means YOU, dick cheney. That means YOU, charles krauthammer. That means YOU, george will. That means YOU, billo. That means YOU, guy-whose-name-rhymes-with-VANITY. That means YOU, Pox Noisies! That means YOU, all you assholes who got it wrong the first time and are STILL getting it wrong today! YOU! YOU FIRST!!!"
God, I'd give almost anything to be able to go on camera somewhere and say that to their faces, for the record, and ON the record!
erronis
(15,185 posts)Of any battle. Them and their spawn - their sons and their daughters. No deferments. Just grab your shield and spear and go fight like you want the rest of us to fight, and die.
"But we're too important! We need to coordinate this mayhem; we need to talk to the press and we need to spout the lies. Our stockholders need us to show them how we are profitting through these actions. Our children are too busy in their nice colleges and jobs at our friends' companies.
You and your children are only worth the military script with military benefits, post war healthcare, and military burials."
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)for instance, Senator Leahy in his pre-vote IWR speech, predicts it. Many of us saw something like this coming.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)If it's the one he gave the night of the vote, I watched it and he set me up for a tremendous crash. I am very bitter about the casual attitude of Democrats in Congress when Bush/Cheney wanted to go to war.
cali
(114,904 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)need to re-read Leahy's words. "The resolution now before the Senate leaves the door open to act alone, even absent an imminent threat." Those that voted for the resolution knew what was in store. To now say they didnt is a lie.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)I remember the speeches - no one can use the excuse that they didn't know what they were voting for. They knew.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)The willingness to 'forget' that vote is shocking to me. To dismiss the historically tragic results, which were PREDICTED, of the support for the liars is simply STUNNING. Anyone who voted for that war, and that vote WAS for the war despite the weasel language we get to excuse it, should be ashamed to show their faces, let alone run for president.
I supported Obama because of his opposition to that war.
Yes, we knew. And so should they have known, they DID know, it's impossible to think they did not. They voted for it because they miscalculated politically. To vote for war for political reasons is simply shameful.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)were lost and up to 5 million Iraqi's lives were ruined. Not to mention the damage it did to our Democracy and economy. There is no excusing their vote to give the Republicans carte blanche authority to wage war.
Which is worse? Republicans that cant wait to kill Iraqi's or Democrats that slap them on the back and say "Go to it with my blessing."
Response to cali (Original post)
imthevicar This message was self-deleted by its author.
cali
(114,904 posts)Goering was in the docks facing death. His pronouncements (self-serving dog shit) in the dock should be taken as...self-serving dog shit.
World War II is a complex web. Yes, the Versailles Treaty and the insistent humiliation and punishment of Germany are factors, but that doesn't preclude placing the responsibility of that war smack of Hitler's craven, narrow shoulders.
Your post is disgusting.
imthevicar
(811 posts)I bow to your superior Intellect!
Why Bother.
cali
(114,904 posts)to bolster your argument?
No bowing necessary.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)that I participated in those futile "marches" against the incipient illegal invasion.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)That's just it. We have learned but the oligarchy our beloved country has become doesn't care. Profits are everything. Whether it's 12,000 deaths a year for the gun industry or 220,000 a year for big tobacco or a million deaths in Iraq for the warmongers as long as there's a profit it's all good for the rich bastards. Hell ain't big enough for them.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)and it makes me very sad. "Diving for dear life. When we could be diving for pearls." That's a line from Elvis Costello's poignant song Shipbuilding. He wrote it when Great Britain was ramping up for the Falklands invasion. I suppose all one could hear there, then, was rally round the flag and that you were unpatriotic if you opposed the invasion. We sure heard a lot of that prior to the Iraq invasion (a war against the wrong country). Most sad to me is that those who seemed to do the biggest cheerleading for that war at the time now seem to not remember or even respect us dissident voices.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oil contracts.
Fear of terrorism
The attitude that it's "OURS". "We won it fair and square".
Then there's the ever annoying "White Man's Burden" as if the "primitives" over there are too stupid to do anything for themselves.
The last one usually is spouted by someone who once mixed smoking with working on a carb and lost their eyebrows.
cali
(114,904 posts)Exposethefrauds
(531 posts)Refused to prosecute those responsible for starting it in the first place.
Complain all you want but until people are punished for creating the mess in the first place, they will continue until someone puts a stop to it.
So we might as well kick back, pop some corn and enjoy the show because perpetual war is what we get!
mgardener
(1,812 posts)How we were treated by republicans, calling us traitors for even questioning the war or the POTUS during "war time".
Look how the republicans have devolved under POTUS Obama. The hate is frightening and the attacks so much worse.
We should NEVER Forget what republicans can do.
cali
(114,904 posts)and certainly they are the biggest miscreants, but there's been plenty of dem complicity.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)ms liberty
(8,558 posts)mainer
(12,018 posts)and I said so at the time when so many on DU were cheering on the defeat of Khadafi. So there's blindness here on DU as well.
cali
(114,904 posts)knew Libya was fubar too.
mainer
(12,018 posts)I remember getting soundly attacked when I said our involvement in Libya, and the fall of Khadafi, would end in disastrous consequences for that country. I spoke as one who had actually been in Libya, and was accused of being a dictator lover. It gives me no pleasure to see my worst predictions coming true.
CanonRay
(14,088 posts)but some are too terrible to fix.
Iggo
(47,537 posts)I'm lookin' at you, Ms Clinton.
Turbineguy
(37,296 posts)that it will take generations to clean up after Bush. Generations made more by the Teabaggers and other internal American enemies.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,300 posts)Thanks for the thread, cali.
lpbk2713
(42,744 posts)Not only because of how he devastated the world economy but how he mired us in quicksand on several fronts on the other side of the globe with a culture that is still living in the Dark Ages. BushCo didn't care. They looted the US Treasury and laughed all the way to the bank. The rethugs who remain in public office are dutifully covering their tracks and point fingers in every direction but at themselves. They come up with smoke screens like Benghazi rather than spend productive time on anything that might make an incumbent Dem President look good.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)not ONE.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)and many had the courage and integrity to vote against it.
[font size=3]The Democratic Party Honor Roll[/font]
These Democrats should be remembered for their principled stand against the WAR Machine.
[font size=3]The Authorization to Use Military Force in Iraq[/font]
United States Senate
In the Senate, the 21 Democrats, one Republican and one Independent courageously voted their consciences in 2002 against the War in Iraq :
Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii)
Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico)
Barbara Boxer (D-California)
Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia)
Kent Conrad (D-North Dakota)
Jon Corzine (D-New Jersey)
Mark Dayton (D-Minnesota)
Dick Durbin (D-Illinois)
Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin)
Bob Graham (D-Florida)
Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii)
Jim Jeffords (I-Vermont)
Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts)
Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont)
Carl Levin (D-Michigan)
Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland)
Patty Murray (D-Washington)
Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island)
Paul Sarbanes (D-Maryland)
Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan)
The late Paul Wellstone (D-Minnesota)
Ron Wyden (D-Oregon)
Lincoln Chaffee (R-Rhode Island)
United States House of Representatives
Six House Republicans and one independent joined 126 Democratic members of the House of Represenatives:
Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii)
Tom Allen (D-Maine)
Joe Baca (D-California)
Brian Baird (D-Washington DC)
John Baldacci (D-Maine, now governor of Maine)
Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin)
Xavier Becerra (D-California)
Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon)
David Bonior (D-Michigan, retired from office)
Robert Brady (D-Pennsylvania)
Corinne Brown (D-Florida)
Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio)
Lois Capps (D-California)
Michael Capuano (D-Massachusetts)
Benjamin Cardin (D-Maryland)
Julia Carson (D-Indiana)
William Clay, Jr. (D-Missouri)
Eva Clayton (D-North Carolina, retired from office)
James Clyburn (D-South Carolina)
Gary Condit (D-California, retired from office)
John Conyers, Jr. (D-Michigan)
Jerry Costello (D-Illinois)
William Coyne (D-Pennsylvania, retired from office)
Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland)
Susan Davis (D-California)
Danny Davis (D-Illinois)
Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon)
Diana DeGette (D-Colorado)
Bill Delahunt (D-Massachusetts)
Rosa DeLauro (D-Connecticut)
John Dingell (D-Michigan)
Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas)
Mike Doyle (D-Pennsylvania)
Anna Eshoo (D-California)
Lane Evans (D-Illinois)
Sam Farr (D-California)
Chaka Fattah (D-Pennsylvania)
Bob Filner (D-California)
Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts)
Charles Gonzalez (D-Texas)
Luis Gutierrez (D-Illinois)
Alice Hastings (D-Florida)
Earl Hilliard (D-Alabama, retired from office)
Maurice Hinchey (D-New York)
Ruben Hinojosa (D-Texas)
Rush Holt (D-New Jersey)
Mike Honda (D-California)
Darlene Hooley (D-Oregon)
Inslee
Jackson (Il.)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Johnson, E.B.
Jones (OH)
Kaptur
Kildee
Kilpatrick
Kleczka
Kucinich
LaFalce
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
Lofgren
Maloney (CT)
Matsui
McCarthy (MO)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McKinney
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Menendez
Millender-McDonald
Miller
Mollohan
Moran (Va)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Owens
Pallone
Pastor
Payne
Pelosi
Price (NC)
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Rivers
Rodriguez
Roybal-Allard
Rush
Sabo
Sanchez
Sanders
Sawyer
Schakowsky
Scott
Serrano
Slaughter
Snyder
Solis
Stark
Strickland
Stupak
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Towns
Udall (NM)
Udall (CO)
Velazquez
Visclosky
Waters
Watson
Watt
Woolsey
Wu
joanbarnes
(1,721 posts)I always say I hate it when I'm right.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Even if a few of the toe suckers now claim to have lost that chills-up-the-leg feelin'.
Tikki
(14,549 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 14, 2014, 09:44 PM - Edit history (1)
the source and it wasn't even that much of a stretch.
He even projected with his fool me once, fooledt bullish*.
The p(ps)os were so readable. It was about the financial potential for their buddies and they have laughed
and I mean laughed, all the way to the bank.
We need to make sure this never happens again.
We need to never stop saying: WE KNEW and WE TOLD YOU SO and challenge others to speak up with what they know.
The Tikkis and others
devils chaplain
(602 posts)Other than the Bush admin, is that many members of congress "Knew" also but voted for the IWR anyway for political reasons. I won't name names.
Mega Kudos to Obama for being against it back in the beginning.
Skittles
(153,122 posts)NOW she admits she was wrong? Gawd.
Response to cali (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)by Dennis Kucinich
October 31, 2002
Unilateral military action by the United States against Iraq is unjustified, unwarranted, and illegal. The Administration has failed to make the case that Iraq poses an imminent threat to the United States.
There is no credible evidence linking Iraq to 9/11. There is no credible evidence linking Iraq to Al Qaeda. Nor is there any credible evidence that Iraq possesses deliverable weapons of mass destruction, or that it intends to deliver them against the United States.
snip---
Unilateral action on the part of the United States, or in partnership with Great Britain, would for the first time set our nation on the bloodstained path of aggressive war, a sacrilege upon the memory of those who fought to defend this country. America's moral authority would be undermined throughout the world. It would destabilize the entire Persian Gulf and Middle East region. And it would signal for Russia to invade Georgia; China, Taiwan; North Korea, the South; India, Pakistan.
---
America cannot and should not be the world's policeman. America cannot and should not try to pick the leaders of other nations. Nor should America and the American people be pressed into the service of international oil interests and arms dealers.
It is still as sickening as it ever was to see the Third Way anti-democratic trolls here denigrate former Congressman Dennis Kucinich.
He would have been the best President ever, we would not be having this discussion right now if he had been elected Prez in 2004. Iraq would no longer be a major concern.
If only.
Make no mistake, the prescient truth stated in the article posted above is the very reason the Third Way still hates and mocks Dennis Kucinich.
erronis
(15,185 posts)"It would destabilize the entire Persian Gulf and Middle East region."
Yup - great call.
Time to get all those chicken-hawks on a a plane for their last sortie into Iraq.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)familiarized myself with their agenda, I knew the stated reasons for going to war with Iraq were all total bullshit. The Iraq war was a foregone conclusion once the chimp was installed and 9/11 was just the New Pearl Harbor they needed to get the ball rolling. What we needed at the time was a free and honest press to report on these thugs and their plans. What we got was crickets and a resulting giant clusterfuck. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Perle -- all colluding war criminals spurred on by a cheerleading propagandizing press and most of the American public played for the easily led fools they are.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Broke his promise to give the investigators time, which was broadcast a day or two before.
I remember desperate hope, followed by shocked despair.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)They kicked the invasion in high gear at the time because they knew there was evidence coming forward to contradict the propaganda that was being spewed. In a week or two those demonstrations and questioning by the many would have jeopardized their whole contrived war footing.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Yeah....all I remember is the feeling and that horrible moment, frozen in time.
Hekate
(90,565 posts)Leith
(7,808 posts)at the time, but I knew that going into Iraq would be the stupidest damned thing the US could do. I remember hearing about it on TV. All I could do was bury my face in my hands and shake my head a little. I felt a horrible sense of dread. For good reason, obviously.
It's wonderful to know that there are so many others who felt and still feel the same as I do.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)You wrote "the military-industrial complex will never give up the reins of foreign policy."
I'd add that the revelations of wholesale spying on the American people by the DIA, NSA, CIA and apparently by all the rest of the nation's intelligence community shows they won't give up the reins of domestic policy, as well.
They knew. And here we are. And thanks for a great post and thread, cali.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)we knew the Iraqi government was held together 'somehow' by a dictator from the Bath party.
We knew Powell's show & tell was bogus.
We knew that millions of us protested this idiocy, but the M$M counted only thousands.
We knew we were right.
But the government of the people had been stolen by power brokers that saw a fortune waiting.
We got canned responses from our representatives telling us why they supported this theft.
And here we are a decade later. What has changed? Only the blame.
Facts are facts, but not according to those in charge.
But, I guess they haven't gone too far yet because they're still in charge.
Sometimes I wonder if this is the reason for the 2nd amendment...
locks
(2,012 posts)but I remember it well and also that no one learned from that warning. Many of us honestly believed that WW2 would be the last war and we would never make more nuclear bombs after Hiroshima. Instead, fear and hate have continued to write our foreign policy and also greed. Think how many children we could have saved or the lives made better with the money we wasted in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
If we bomb Iraq we will be bombing not only people we wanted to help but also the millions of dollars worth of military equipment that WE sold or gave to them.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)no one could have known. Just like the Kerry supporters.
Plenty of us knew, but revisionism is more useful to excuse politicians who were too cowardly to stand for what's right.
cali
(114,904 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
elias49
(4,259 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)friend I had gone to high school with at a class reunion and we thought the same thing at once. We're F--ked! At my right wing sister's house which made it worse. She lives in TX, and has yet to wake up! Amazingly we get along very well, but we CAN NOT talk politics or religion. I'm quite Liberal and suppose I'd say an atheist, she's a Fundamentalist Christian! I have 5 sisters, she's the ONLY ONE who went way off the ranch!!
I too feel so sorry for Obama now, even if he was never my 1st choice, but neither was Hillary. Hillary may have learned some lessons, but if I were given a wish for President it would be Sanders/Warren or vice versa!
This country is hardly recognizable to me anymore!!
AND STILL, they're crying out for MORE WAR! But these days there's so little that they do that surprises me. ANYTHING to screw Obama over is their only MANTRA. I heard someone say the other day, I think it was Michael Dyson, that if Obama walked across the Potomac they would shake their heads and say "he can't swim!" And each and every day they seem to do something MORE to prevent Obama from having any success and to keep their JACK BOOTS on the necks of "we the people"! A shame in so many UN-AMERICAN ways!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)is when I started looking hard and long at my political beliefs. I did this because I knew the invasion was wrong. It did make me realize that I was really (at the time) center democrat, not a republican. As I have aged, I have become liberal.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)they could lie round the clock about everything they intended to do.
Al Jazeera was where you had to go to get the truth about lies, which continued for years and they BOMBED Al Jazeera, killed reporters and/or detained and tortured them.
What we have is a Propaganda Machine now. And it works. They learned that having a free press is a real threat to those who plan to lie to the people so they prepared to take over the media and they succeeded.
But they hadn't calculated on the Internet, back when they were working on the media takeover. So now they are moving to take that over also.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Skittles
(153,122 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Same crew here foaming at the mouth with loyalty to whatever makes them feel good. Fuck rational thought. They say it would be impractical to have trials against Dumbass...that Obama should stay out of it. FINE, take it up in world court and have him support the outcome!
Not like he is running again.
So sick of a few not caring about accountability and lying about current events. Rewriting history is sad, shouldn't be tolerated on DU.
Skittles
(153,122 posts)F*** THEM ALL TO HELL
cali
(114,904 posts)accountable
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Skittles
(153,122 posts)I squawked HARD about that fucking bullshit