General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Have a Big Bubba Problem: Clinton is The Most Admired POTUS of Last 25 Years
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/06/15/republicans-big-bubba-problem-clinton-admired-potus-25-years.htmlRepublicans Have a Big Bubba Problem: Clinton is The Most Admired POTUS of Last 25 Years
By: Jason Easley
Sunday, June, 15th, 2014, 7:35 pm
With the Clinton political brand poised for a resurgence in 2016, the last thing Republicans needed was a new polling showing that Bill Clinton is the most admired president of the last 25 years, but that is exactly what theyve got.
A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Annenberg Survey found that Bill Clinton is the runaway most admired president of the last 25 years. Forty-two percent of respondents picked Clinton. President Obama came in at 18%, George W. Bush got 17%, and George H.W. Bush was close behind at 16%.
Normally, these sorts of polls make for nice historical arguments as to who was the better president, but with Hillary Clinton likely running in 2016, her husbands runaway win in the POTUS admiration contest takes on an entirely different dimension. Republicans had already been trying to deal with former President Clintons popularity by reviving the Lewinsky scandal, which shows that Republicans have learned nothing. Every time, they bring up Lewinsky, Clinton gets more popular.
snip//
Republicans are flipping out already over Hillary Clinton running, but one of their biggest problems in 2016 may be the presence of her husband. Republicans have a big bubba problem. If the Clintons hit the campaign trail firing on all cylinders, 2016 could be another blowout win for Democrats.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)McConnell, what a great win for democrats. Americans prospered during his administration though he fought with a GOP Congress.
JI7
(89,239 posts)and one of the reasons Ashley Judd did not get into the race.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)In addition to conducting a historian survey, C-Span also conducted a presidential leadership survey of 1145 viewers in December 1999.[30]
Abraham Lincoln
Franklin D. Roosevelt
George Washington
Theodore Roosevelt
Ronald Reagan
Harry S. Truman
Woodrow Wilson
Thomas Jefferson
John F. Kennedy
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Lyndon B. Johnson
James K. Polk
Andrew Jackson
James Monroe
William McKinley
John Adams
Grover Cleveland
James Madison
John Quincy Adams
George H.W. Bush
Bill Clinton
Jimmy Carter
Gerald Ford
William Howard Taft
Richard Nixon
Rutherford B. Hayes
Calvin Coolidge
Zachary Taylor
James A. Garfield
Martin Van Buren
Benjamin Harrison
Chester A. Arthur
Ulysses S. Grant
Herbert Hoover
Millard Fillmore
John Tyler
William Henry Harrison
Warren G. Harding
Franklin Pierce
Andrew Johnson
James Buchanan
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I can see how Clinton has been super popular through the years, but I didn't think he'd be more popular than Obama.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Obama ergo Clinton tops them. Many around me know they prospered under Clinton administration and it never happened under either Bush and the GOP is making damn sure it doesn't happen now.
JI7
(89,239 posts)especially as he gets into the post presidency work and we can reflect back to what he dealt with.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)The Clinton years were unquestionably a time of progress, especially on the economy [...] Clinton's 1992 slogan, 'Putting people first,' and his stress on 'the economy, stupid,' pitched an optimistic if still gritty populism at a middle class that had suffered under Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. [...] By the end of the Clinton presidency, the numbers were uniformly impressive. Besides the record-high surpluses and the record-low poverty rates, the economy could boast the longest economic expansion in history; the lowest unemployment since the early 1970s; and the lowest poverty rates for single mothers, black Americans, and the aged.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Bill_Clinton#The_economy
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)They're both extremely smart, but somehow Clinton is warmer. Part of it, I think, may be his disarming ability to laugh at himself.
lark
(23,061 posts)The Clinton years were great economically for the working class so people remember that time with fondness. Yes, Clinton did some bad things like NAFTA and the ending of the banking restrictions (can't think of the act now, brain went blank) that had long term bad effects, but at the time everything was going up for the workers. He also put in FMLA which has tremendously helped working people and did so from the start. ACA took years to implement and just got really started this year. Long term, Obama could be seen in a much better light if he doesn't keep on gutting provisions that helped the workers in favor of the industry making even more money.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)lark
(23,061 posts)Post-racist society has yet to arrive.
BootinUp
(47,078 posts)bradla
(89 posts)Can you imagine if Obama was president when 911 happened...or how about lying to start a war that got 4500 hundred Americans killed. He would have been impeached. Liberal media my ass. George Bush started an ill advised war that cost trillions of dollars and the economy crashed as he was leaving. I do not care what anybody says about the economy now, it is better than it was when Bush was leaving. People were being laid off left and right. It really is something.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Be most stupid.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)It's not really a fair comparison. Assuming Clinton drew off most of the Democrats, it makes sense that there wouldn't be too many lef to vote for Obama.
To me, the important thing is that Democrats took 60% of the vote.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)So do some other people. (and they'll be here in 5... 4... 3... 2... )
On a related note, I have no doubt Obama's standing will improve post-presidency.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)January 20, 1981 January 20, 1989...so, he escapes comparison on the basis of days.
Neat bit of data culling....
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)to see if the nation has learned anything, yet.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)25 years just makes a better time period than 25 years and a few days.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Having Carter and Reagan in the mix would have been very interesting. I have NO idea how it would have turned out.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I just threw in Carter since he is still alive.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)Republicans had already been trying to deal with former President Clintons popularity by reviving the Lewinsky scandal, which shows that Republicans have learned nothing. Every time, they bring up Lewinsky, Clinton gets more popular.
Given that the Lewinsky scandal amounts to "Married man gets blow job from a woman who is not his wife and lies about it", there is clearly nothing there.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)I had no idea.
JustAnotherGen
(31,780 posts)So they (the 'Right') hated him before they loved him?
Those numbers have got to include some of those idiots screaming to have him impeached 16 years ago. Vindicated!
William769
(55,144 posts)muntrv
(14,505 posts)samsingh
(17,590 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)Around here he's persona non grata.
rpannier
(24,328 posts)and think he's full of sh*t
Metric System
(6,048 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)I certainly hope he isn't