Greg Chaney has changed his mind about accepting the nod for a run at the statehouse, but nothing about a chairman being selected.

And he sounds like a dyed-in-the-wool Repub:

the republicans are tearing their party apart and I am enjoying the show!!!!!!

Elections so they seek to split the GOP into and then have the nerve to want everything their way.
If they had a decent message they would be a major party, bet there was some kind of ugly going on.

And since he has put himself in the running for Cantor's vacated leadership job, I'm sure this Idaho train wreck is bound to impress his House colleagues. If getting nothing done other than officiating over shouting and yelling is a criterion for "leadership" in the GOP these days, Labrador was certainly able to rise to the occasion.

That's pretty much the job description for any Repub leadership position.

they ALWAYS find a way to go lower

very interesting conversations; yes INDEED

You mean they couldn't decide as to whether Bergdahl should be hung or shot?

icon for lurking GOPhers, Libertarians and Tea Party members.

That's the only thing I'd see these two factions in a fight about. Really, that's what I thought they would be fighting over, the fate of their native son and how to paint Obama as a Muslim terrorist.

OTOH, GOP Libertarians might've defended him, if they claim Bergdahl as one of their own Galts.

I gotta give credit to the GOP for not going that route, just saying that I expected it from those (insert foul epitaphs here).

Or has that particular media driven ship already run out of wind for the GOP? Along with their conventions that want to impeach the President or secede from the USA?

I mean, exactly what does the GOP have going for them, other than starving the poor, discrimination, stealing the Commons, destroying unions, public schools and services, forcing a theocracy on us and bringing down the government?

Inquiring and pissed off minds want to know!

The Tea Partiers say they want a smaller federal government but, to the extent I can claim any expertise on Tea Party "thinking", that doesn't apply to the military. Libertarians usually favor a less interventionist foreign policy; for example, Ron Paul and the Cato Institute both opposed the invasion of Iraq.

Thoroughly consistent libertarians would be social liberals (favoring marriage equality, legalization of marijuana, etc.), which I don't think would go over well with the Tea Party.