General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTroops to Iraq to protect the diplomats and other American embassy personnel is a reasonable move
. . . with all of the pressure to attack something in Iraq and all of the squawk about the response to the threat to the U.S. embassy in Libya, it's understandable and reasonable that the President augmented the State Dept.'s private security forces with a contingent of U.S. troops.
I don't think this is a backdoor to some kind of troop buildup for any on-the-ground combat operation. I do think that trying to secure those embassy folks in the middle of the ongoing conflict there could put those forces at risk. I'm not sure they can just hunker down and maintain their presence there. Using those forces to transport all of them out would seem like the responsible thing to do at this point, military action, or not. Maybe that's the plan.
It's not as if U.S. forces are prepared or likely to play a long-term role in any effort to defend Iraqi territory. Defending that embassy indefinitely seems a waste of resources and an unacceptable risk until the security situation is more certain. Without an operative political and security strategy from Iraqis, risking troops to hold down that building is a losing proposition, whether military force is employed or not.
Close it and bring the Americans home.
Washington Post ?@washingtonpost 49m
U.S. airstrikes in Iraq would be risky, retired military officers say http://wapo.st/1pCMWzn
Hekate
(90,645 posts)What do people think we're supposed to do with the personnel at the embassy? Just abandon them to their fate?
Cha
(297,154 posts)the alternative. Something unheard of that the O Admn would never do.. Turning their backs on those left behind in Iraq.
mahalo bigtree
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)Why did the White House notify Congress? Notifying Congress is required under the War Powers Act if deploying troops, but not for sending troops to our own embassy. I'm not sure I understand why this was done.
bigtree
(85,986 posts). . . I don't know the exact precedent or provision that told them it was required. Here's the letter to Congress:
http://www.vox.com/2014/6/16/5815968/american-troops-are-going-back-to-iraq