Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: Corporate shock over the defeat of Cantor.
The Corporates and the CraziesJeremy Peters and Shaila Dewan write about corporate shock over the sudden fall of Eric Cantor; its further confirmation of the story I told in my last column. Corporations and plutocrats had a good deal going: they bankrolled politicians who talked cultural populism during campaigns, but more or less ignored all that and focused on tax cuts and deregulation after the polls closed. And Cantor fit that profile perfectly.
But now the big money has lost control; the base is demanding politicians who dont just talk the crazy talk, but walk the crazy walk. For a couple of months the story line was that the money was regaining control, but between Cantor and Cochran that narrative has been blown out of the water.
Whats unclear is what comes next. By pivoting so hard to the GOP, the money has lost much of its leverage over the Democrats yes, theres Andrew Cuomo and people like him, but its not the same as once it was.
How bad is it? So bad that some establishment Republicans which means people who work for the corporate side are pining for another run by, yes, Mitt Romney.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/the-corporates-and-the-crazies/
If corporate republicans are thinking about turning back to romney, you know things are bad.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1325 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Corporate shock over the defeat of Cantor. (Original Post)
pampango
Jun 2014
OP
underpants
(182,742 posts)1. I, for one, support Mitt for the Republican nomination in 2016
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)2. It's time for a Re-Mitter!
savalez
(3,517 posts)7. Gather the Mitt-wits!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)8. The sky is the li-Mitt!
closeupready
(29,503 posts)3. If they are throwing their millions away on losing RW candidates,
I'm all for it - it's win-win - we get a Democrat instead, and steakhouses (and their staffs) get lots of business from the Republican candidates.
JI7
(89,244 posts)4. Jeb Bush might be the McCain/Romney for 2016 and Rand Paul may be
the Huckabee, Gingrich, Santorum etc.
one of the establishment types might get Cruz or some other crazy to run to split the crazy vote with Rand PAul so Jeb could win.
Rex
(65,616 posts)5. Aww...did they lose control over the monster they themselves created!?
Plutocrats make America suck.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)6. Brat had a lot of outside money help from Koch brothers thought
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)9. Please run Mitt!
They want Jeb, but if Clinton looks too good, they won't run him. Don't want to hurt his widdle feewings.