General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill President Obama ever pardon former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman?
Last edited Wed Jun 18, 2014, 06:17 PM - Edit history (1)
June 17, 2014
Former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman (D) is still rotting away in a prison cell for a crime he did not commit.
"Siegelman, whose Karl Rove-inspired prosecution helped gut Alabama's once-competitive Democratic Party, served nearly a year of his term before release on bond when whistle-blowers and legal experts helped show in 2007 and 2008 that he had been targeted for political reasons.
The prominent, blunt-speaking Alabama businessman Luther 'Stan' Pete has said his fellow Republicans clearly framed Siegelman.
In 2009, the Obama Justice Department requested that Judge Fuller sentence Siegelman to
20 more years in prison when his appeals were concluded.
The new administration stood shoulder-to-shoulder with it's Bush predecessors in continuing the frame-up and cover-up.
This was part of a 'look forward, not backward' mantra that President Obama articulated most famously in avoiding accountability for Bush-era torture and cover-up, but events make clear that the cover-ups obviously applied also to Bush political prosecutions."
More:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/05/1097552/-Gov-Don-Siegelman-Facing-20-Years-Obama-Pushes-for-Long-Sentence#/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023955756/
Videos & more
http://www.donsiegelman.org/
http://www.youtube.com/user/freedonsiegelmannow/
hlthe2b
(102,127 posts)and drill him on this...
I have no explanation and can invent no excuse for the administration on this.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)First has to be requested and secondly is typically at the end of the second term or first term for those who only do one term.
hlthe2b
(102,127 posts)That they have done so in what seems to be an inexplicable disdain for justice, hardly makes me think they would pardon him.
I WANT ANSWERS!
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I think President Bush followed some of President Clinton's things.....I think it is part of the territory. Of course, I have no idea why the Bush Administration and Obama Administration have the same facts or beliefs on this particular case.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)The petro-military-financial complex has "captured" the government, and it uses the DoJ as its corrupt law enforcement arm to serve punishment against those who negatively affect its interests.
Ta dah. That's it.
red dog 1
(27,771 posts)when Holder was testifying before Congress.
It's up on You Tube, but I wasn't able to get the full URL.
The title is "Cohen Asks Holder To Free Gov. Siegelman"
Here is another You Tube video on the Siegelman case.
http://www.youtube.com/user/freedonsiegelmannow/
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Holder ranks with Ed Meese, John Mitchell and Harry Daugherty at the bottom of the list.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)U.S. Judge Mark E. Fuller, the guy who helped railroad Gov. Don Siegelman.
Fuller just happens to be the owner of a company that's made a huge fortune off the Pentagon and War Inc via no-bid crony War on Terror largesse.
The Pork Barrel World of Judge Mark Fuller
By Scott Horton
Harper's August 6, 2007, 5:14 pm
For the last week, weve been examining the role played by Judge Mark Everett Fuller in the trial, conviction, and sentencing of former Alabama Governor Don E. Siegelman. Today, we examine a post-trial motion, filed in April 2007, asking Fuller to recuse himself based on his extensive private business interests, which turn very heavily on contracts with the United States Government, including the Department of Justice.
The recusal motion rested upon details about Fullers personal business interests. On February 22, 2007, defense attorneys obtained information that Judge Fuller held a controlling 43.75% interest in government contractor Doss Aviation, Inc. After investigating these claims for over a month, the attorneys filed a motion for Fullers recusal on April 18, 2007. The motion stated that Fullers total stake in Doss Aviation was worth between $1-5 million, and that Fullers income from his stock for 2004 was between $100,001 and $1 million dollars.
In other words, Judge Fuller likely made more from his business income, derived from U.S. Government contracts, than as a judge. Fuller is shown on one filing as President of the principal business, Doss Aviation, and his address is shown as One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, the address of the Frank M. Johnson Federal Courthouse, in which his chambers are located.
SNIP...
Doss Aviation and its subsidiaries also held contracts with the FBI. This is problematic when one considers that FBI agents were present at Siegelmans trial, and that Fuller took the extraordinary step of inviting them to sit at counsels table throughout trial. Moreover, while the case was pending, Doss Aviation received a $178 million contract from the federal government.
CONTINUED...
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/08/hbc-90000762
There's a special place for Judge Fuller, and it's not on the bench. Why the Obama Justice Department won't send him there for the rest of his natural days -- and release and pardon Don Siegelman -- is the root of the problem.
red dog 1
(27,771 posts)Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)leave office, especially since he is innocent of any wrong-doing?? It's way PAST TIME, in my not so humble opinion!
Peace,
Ghost
LuvNewcastle
(16,834 posts)after he was inaugurated. He had a Democratic Congress, and I doubt the media would have said much, otherwise they would've had to explain the whole sordid deal. That's the main reason Siegelman is still in prison -- most people just don't know about it.
arthritisR_US
(7,283 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)former9thward
(31,940 posts)There was no need. A judge threw out the charges due to prosecution misconduct.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)former9thward
(31,940 posts)The judge had held the prosecution in contempt and initiated criminal proceedings against them. When he threw out the charges the judge said "There was never a judgment of conviction in this case. The jury's verdict is being set aside and has no legal effect."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stevens
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Siegelman did nothing wrong. Nothing.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Had a great visit with his wife at an environmental fundraiser. Great lady.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)red dog 1
(27,771 posts)To sign the Petition To President Obama to Pardon Gov. Siegelman
http://www.donsiegelman.org/
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)raging moderate
(4,292 posts)This is a terrible miscarriage of justice.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,283 posts)that it is presented to the President?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ybbor
(1,554 posts)The whole idea of looking forward and not back bullshit sucks! If that is the case then NO criminal or civil case can ever be tried. You must look back to investigate anything, ANYTHING!
Obama's refusal to try any of the Bush folks for anything was an explicit way of saying "what you did was okay". All of it. I'm not sure if it was Eric Holder advising Obama, or the other way around, but either way it sucks.
This Siegelman case is exactly the same thing. If Scooter Libby got off Scott free for putting people's lives in danger, Siegelman deserves to at least have his sentence commuted, if not be pardoned entirely.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)a weak appeaser. This pardon would have been a shot across the bow to Rove. So sad.
red dog 1
(27,771 posts)historylovr
(1,557 posts)bobduca
(1,763 posts)When one is dead-set on looking forward it's difficult to see any crimes that occurred in the past.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)By Michael Collins
Then, when Siegelman appealed his case to the Supreme Court in 2009, President Obama's Attorney General dispatched Solicitor General Elena Kagan to argue against the appeal in November.
Before accepting the case, Elena Kagan knew or should have known: that the U.S. Attorney who began the Siegelman investigation was closely tied to Karl Rove; that Siegelman never benefited personally from the contribution to an education funding initiative; that the case was so outrageous, forty-four attorneys general petitioned Congress; and, that the presiding judge in the case owned a major interest in a defense firm that received a $178 million federal contract between Siegelman's indictment and trial, a massive conflict of interest.
Most revealing, before her argument against the former governor's appeal, Kagan knew or should have known the following. After two charges had been dropped in a 2009 appeal, Justice Department attorneys recommended a twenty year sentence instead of the seven years already rendered. Fewer offenses for sentencing meant thirteen additional years by the strange logic of federal justice.
Kagan knew or should have known all this and more. That didn't stop her from arguing that Don Siegelman should be kept in jail. ...
That judgment is that Elena Kagan was a willing accomplice in one of the most outrageous political prosecutions of our time. Why should anyone ever trust her?
Her nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States should be rejected unanimously.
SOURCE: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8614514