Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 07:56 PM Jun 2014

Frat House for Jesus The entity behind C Street. ("New Yorker" Magazine)

Frat House for Jesus
The entity behind C Street.
by Peter J. Boyer September 13, 2010

One midwinter night in 2008, Senator John Ensign, of Nevada, the chairman of the Senate Republican Policy Committee, was roused from bed when six men entered his room and ordered him to get up. Ensign knew the men intimately; a few hours earlier, he had eaten dinner with them, as he had nearly every Tuesday evening since he’d come to Washington. Now they were rebuking him for his recklessness. They told him he was endangering his career, ruining lives, and offending God.

The men leading this intervention considered themselves Ensign’s closest friends in Washington. Four of those who confronted Ensign—Senator Tom Coburn and Representatives Bart Stupak, Mike Doyle, and Zach Wamp—lived with him in a nineteenth-century brick row house on C Street*, in southeast Washington, a short walk from the Capitol. The men regarded themselves in part as an accountability group. Despite their political differences—Coburn and Wamp are Republicans, Stupak and Doyle are Democrats—they had pledged to hold one another to a life lived by the principles of Jesus, and they considered the Tuesday supper gatherings at C Street an inviolable ritual.

The regulars at the dinner included the nine men who lived at the house, along with half a dozen colleagues and friends who were non-residents. Every Tuesday evening, they would convene in the first-floor living room of the C Street house, a large space furnished with a long leather sofa and stuffed chairs. A bookshelf was filled with political biographies and James Patterson novels, and paintings of hunting scenes and sailing vessels hung on the walls, suggesting the atmosphere of a men’s club, or, as Coburn put it, a fraternity house. (Some of the private bedrooms upstairs, including his, were usually in a state of collegiate disarray.) After some small talk and friendly ribbing, the group broke up, and the men took their places in two narrow, adjoining dining rooms down the hall.

The meals were prepared by a volunteer host couple who lived in the house, and were served by a team of silent young men, also volunteers, who were part of the group’s mentoring program. At mealtime, the tone turned more serious, but the subject of conversation was rarely politics. Spiritual issues and the most intimate personal matters were discussed, with the assurance of absolute confidentiality.

Coburn, the senior man in the house, enjoyed these sessions, but at dinner that Tuesday night in 2008 he was plainly troubled. Finally, he spoke out. “Guys,” he said, “we’ve got a problem in the house.”

One day some weeks earlier, Coburn said, he had learned that John Ensign, who was married, was having an affair with Cynthia Hampton, the wife of one of his aides, Doug Hampton, and there had been an immediate intervention that same day. Meeting in an upstairs room at the C Street house (a room that was occasionally used for marriage counselling), Doug Hampton, accompanied by Coburn and three lay ministers who manage C Street, had confronted Ensign about the affair. The encounter was filled with recrimination and tears, and culminated in Ensign confessing and vowing to repent. Coburn returned to the Senate, but the others remained with Ensign, handing him a pen and paper and dictating a letter to Cynthia Hampton declaring his intention to end the affair.

“Cindy,” the letter began. “This is the most important letter that I’ve ever written. What I did with you was wrong. I was completely self-centered + only thinking of myself.” Ensign wrote that God wished for the two marriages to heal, and for the two lovers to “restore our relationships to Him.” The letter was put in a FedEx envelope, and addressed. The three ministers—Marty Sherman, Tim Coe, and David Coe—drove with Ensign to a FedEx station, and watched as he slipped the letter into the drop-box.

Hearing of this weeks later, the men at Coburn’s table were astonished. Ensign, a handsome, silver-haired conservative, was a Republican with national prospects. He and Doug Hampton had been extremely close, attending religious retreats together, and even buying houses in adjacent Las Vegas neighborhoods. Cindy Hampton had been Ensign’s campaign treasurer. Ensign’s Pentecostal faith, embraced when he was in graduate school, had been a central part of his public identity. An active member of the evangelical group Promise Keepers, he had publicly pledged himself to a life of “spiritual, moral, ethical, and sexual purity.”

CONTINUED AT:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/09/13/100913fa_fact_boyer

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frat House for Jesus The entity behind C Street. ("New Yorker" Magazine) (Original Post) KoKo Jun 2014 OP
We Know All This, Ma'am. We Do Not Hold Mrs. Clinton Responsible For it The Magistrate Jun 2014 #1
We always Agree to Disagree on Some Points, Sir..... KoKo Jun 2014 #5
Is there even a separation of church and state in this country? octoberlib Jun 2014 #2
K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2014 #3
What is amazing is that all that coverage nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #4

The Magistrate

(95,243 posts)
1. We Know All This, Ma'am. We Do Not Hold Mrs. Clinton Responsible For it
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 08:01 PM
Jun 2014

She is not going to, once elected, take off a mask and emerge as Ms. Theocrat of 2016, inaugurating the Dominionist millennia.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. We always Agree to Disagree on Some Points, Sir.....
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 07:11 PM
Jun 2014

But...at least we are "reasonable" about it. But, sometimes I do feel you push a bit hard for indefensible.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
2. Is there even a separation of church and state in this country?
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 08:21 PM
Jun 2014

Where I'm currently employed we're strongly discouraged from even discussing religion, much less holding prayer sessions in our offices. Thanks for posting; I hadn't read this article yet.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
4. What is amazing is that all that coverage
Tue Jun 17, 2014, 08:58 PM
Jun 2014

over the Betlway media, is conveniently forgotten. It did happen, but a few here would love to forget about it, and the more they post about it, the more we all go and find them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frat House for Jesus The ...