Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:32 PM Jun 2014

A question, regarding the 275 soldiers being deployed in Iraq

First off, yes, it's not a large number, as troop movements go, and yes, they're there for defensive purposes, and not to join the fight against ISIS.

But what do you think happens if ISIS decides to attack one of these positions? Let's speak truth here, this pack of radicals isn't going to hit the brakes at the sight of an American soldier at the gate.

So what then? Does the president leave the number as it is? Does he send in more soldiers to bolster that number? Does he fire off missiles? Does he pull out like it's Beirut?

Any involvement beyond the purely diplomatic, is too much involvement that carries a real risk of pulling us even deeper back into the quicksand we spent ten years clawing our way out of.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A question, regarding the 275 soldiers being deployed in Iraq (Original Post) Scootaloo Jun 2014 OP
I would be evacuating the Embassy. RussBLib Jun 2014 #1
275 additional troops will not be able to hold the embassy if attacked..... Swede Atlanta Jun 2014 #3
The 275 is probably reinforcements to security already there. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #5
Look for drone and missile strikes WhiteTara Jun 2014 #2
Just a guess... stevenleser Jun 2014 #4

RussBLib

(9,006 posts)
1. I would be evacuating the Embassy.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:35 PM
Jun 2014

Even though Bush spent a billion or two building that embassy, it was a boondoggle then and now it's starting to look like a deathtrap. Do we have another (pseudo-) Benghazi developing?

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
3. 275 additional troops will not be able to hold the embassy if attacked.....
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:41 PM
Jun 2014

we should be evacuating the embassy now. Baghdad is likely to fall within days based on recent news reports. If so we wait to see what government arises out of the ashes and take it from there. I think an embassy with about 20 people is all we need there.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. The 275 is probably reinforcements to security already there.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:28 PM
Jun 2014

Just a guess, but the Embassy probably already had 500 or more armed security. I do agree, that the whole compoud is so huge defending it will be difficult if attacked.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. Just a guess...
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:48 PM
Jun 2014

... the new embassies we have around the world that have been built in the last 10 years or so, including I believe in Iraq, Kenya, Tanzania, Panama and various others, are built with a huge perimeter around them that attempts to put a lot of distance between the large outer fence/wall and the facilities therein. In many cases, such as Panama and Kenya that I know of for sure, the embassy is also located in the outskirts of the city, not in the center like they used to be.

I'm guessing that the additional troops are to staff the perimeter and in the event of an attack, they can hold out long enough to allow the majority of the people inside to be evacuated.

Our embassy in Iraq



US embassy in Panama (note, the land around it is so large the fence is not visible in this pic...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A question, regarding the...