Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:38 PM Jun 2014

Why Delta Force Waited So Long To Grab A Benghazi Ringleader

The mission to capture Ahmed abu Khatallah, one of the ringleaders of the September 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya was more than a year in the making. In the months leading up to the raid, teams from the Army’s 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta, or Delta Force, practiced the extradition on a mock-up of abu Khatallah’s compound at Fort Bragg, according to a U.S. military contractor familiar with the planning for the mission. Eventually, it was a Delta Team with embedded FBI agents on Sunday that snagged the man wanted for the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens, State Department officer Sean Smith and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. The Obama administration has come under withering criticism because the whereabouts of abu Khatallah have been generally known.

But other U.S. officials, who spoke to The Daily Beast anonymously because they were not authorized to talk to the press, said the mission to grab abu Khatallah had been planned for more than a year. Indeed, the Benghazi ringleader had been in the sights of Delta Force operators at the end of August, according to these sources, but no order was given at the time. A senior administration official told The Daily Beast that the delay in apprehending the suspect was due in part to requests from the Justice Department to gather appropriate evidence to prosecute him in criminal court. The practice and patience paid off, apparently. Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Sunday’s raid resulted in no casualties. “Khatallah currently faces criminal charges on three counts, and we retain the option of adding additional charges in the coming days,” said Attorney General Eric Holder in a statement Tuesday.

More here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/17/why-delta-force-waited-so-long-to-grab-a-benghazi-ringleader.html

http://theobamadiary.com/

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Delta Force Waited So Long To Grab A Benghazi Ringleader (Original Post) Playinghardball Jun 2014 OP
Makes sense to me. pinto Jun 2014 #1
So much goes into making all the contingencies happen in synch... Orsino Jun 2014 #2
Just to spotlight the relevant quote: KittyWampus Jun 2014 #3
Yes! The GOP refuse to admit the need. Their furor is about 2014, not the 4 dead. freshwest Jun 2014 #22
They were busy making public service announcements Kaleva Jun 2014 #4
Take the time to get it right. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #5
The fact America can go into another soverign nation with impunity with military forces and pluck a Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #6
Not that many nations have the capability. Kaleva Jun 2014 #7
The capacity is not the issue, it is the legality and imperialism without debate. Most nations also Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #8
Don't you think other nations would do it if they had the capability? Kaleva Jun 2014 #9
Hello strawman ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #10
It is called the Bush* Doctrine Bandit Jun 2014 #11
Imperialism did not begin with Bush, more like it should be called the Imperialism Doctrine. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #12
The idea that America could go after anyone anywhere at any time Bandit Jun 2014 #17
The legality is not in question nor is it imperialism. The Libyan government gave permission. stevenleser Jun 2014 #13
I think there is some issue about whether they did or not, and were properly notified. Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #15
Do you have a link? I'd like to check that out. thanks. nt stevenleser Jun 2014 #18
Libya demands return of Benghazi suspect seized by U.S. forces Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #19
Now the question becomes jeff47 Jun 2014 #21
Yes, Russia can. jeff47 Jun 2014 #20
Do DUers approve? ieoeja Jun 2014 #23
When it all comes out Republicans trying to make hay off this are going to get burned. yellowcanine Jun 2014 #14
I wish Obama did find the cure for cancer, then the media would finally get it that the GOP is isane Fred Sanders Jun 2014 #16
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
3. Just to spotlight the relevant quote:
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jun 2014
the delay in apprehending the suspect was due in part to requests from the Justice Department to gather appropriate evidence to prosecute him in criminal court. The practice and patience paid off, apparently. Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Sunday’s raid resulted in no casualties.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
22. Yes! The GOP refuse to admit the need. Their furor is about 2014, not the 4 dead.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jun 2014

And the calls that this is a 'wag the dog' on Obama's part to save Hillary is as deceitful at the engineers of the Iraq War were. Not listening to their lives now, haven't been for a long time.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. Take the time to get it right.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 01:48 PM
Jun 2014

Makes sense to everyone except republicans. Its not like the guy was a threat to disappear in the mountains of Tora Bora.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
6. The fact America can go into another soverign nation with impunity with military forces and pluck a
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:06 PM
Jun 2014

resident is something America must not discuss.
Can Russia go into any country it choices, say Ukraine, and pluck out a criminal element for trial back in Russia without Ukraine approval?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
8. The capacity is not the issue, it is the legality and imperialism without debate. Most nations also
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:09 PM
Jun 2014

do not have nuclear capacity.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
11. It is called the Bush* Doctrine
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:32 PM
Jun 2014

Obama has never rescinded that and in fact follows it quite well, what with his drone strike around the globe.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
12. Imperialism did not begin with Bush, more like it should be called the Imperialism Doctrine.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:34 PM
Jun 2014

Extraordinary rendition was just a fancy name for the same thing.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
17. The idea that America could go after anyone anywhere at any time
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jun 2014

and without due process and not hide it from the public was because of Bush* and they named it the "Bush* Doctrine" That was and is new to America.. You are correct that the Romans and other Imperialists have done such things for years but not so America, at least not out in the open. It may have been done in a covert manner but Bush* made it a main stream American Value.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
13. The legality is not in question nor is it imperialism. The Libyan government gave permission.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:37 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2014/06/security_camera_footage_shows.html

"Ahmed Abu Khattala is reportedly headed back to America where it's believed he will face trial. President Barack Obama ordered the mission Friday, the Pentagon said, after receiving permission from the Libyan government."

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
19. Libya demands return of Benghazi suspect seized by U.S. forces
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:52 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-libya-benghazi-suspect-20140618-story.html

Libya’s weak interim government on Wednesday verbally assailed the U.S. capture of a suspected mastermind of the 2012 attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans and set off a political firestorm in the United States..

At a news conference nearly 24 hours after the Pentagon publicly disclosed the special-operations raid that netted Ahmed Abu Khatallah, Justice Minister Saleh Marghani denounced the U.S. military action as a violation of Libyan sovereignty and demanded that Abu Khatallah be returned to Libya....

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in Benghazi in September 2012. Warning: This photo gallery may contain images that are disturbing to some readers.

“We had no prior notification,” the minister told reporters. “We did not expect the U.S. to upset our political order.”

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
21. Now the question becomes
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 03:04 PM
Jun 2014

Are they "Pulling a Pakistan" (publicly denying support while privately giving support)

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
20. Yes, Russia can.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 03:02 PM
Jun 2014

In fact, they probably could seize someone from the US if they planned it sufficiently well.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
14. When it all comes out Republicans trying to make hay off this are going to get burned.
Wed Jun 18, 2014, 02:40 PM
Jun 2014

This is a clear win for Obama and the U.S. and Republicans trying out all kinds of specious arguments otherwise are playing with fire by politicizing this. They can't stand it that Obama gets credit for anything, even if it is good for the country. It is just not good enough for them that the guy got captured with no loss of life or injury - no, we should have caught him sooner. Funny, I don't remember any of them harping on the fact that Bush NEVER got bin Laden in seven years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Delta Force Waited So...