Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 01:50 AM Jun 2014

Meet the Republicans trying to sell the internet to the highest bidder

Last edited Thu Jun 19, 2014, 02:24 AM - Edit history (1)

by Marcos Da Silva - June 18, 2014

In May, 28 members of the House of Representatives lobbied the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to drop net neutrality, the idea that Internet service providers should treat all data that travels over their networks equally. The lawmakers proposed instead a system that would allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to provide better access to some websites willing to pay a higher premium, creating new ways for ISPs to manipulate how internet users access websites and erecting new barriers to entry for small businesses.

The FCC heard them loud and clear and also proposed allowing the creation of Internet fast lanes, but hope is not lost. Congressional Democrats have heroically come to the rescue, unveiling legislation yesterday that would force the FCC to ban Internet fast lanes.

However, the bill may face strong opposition from those 28 lawmakers, who include House Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy and Republican Conference Chairman Cathy McMorris Rodgers of the House Leadership. They received more than 2.3 times the amount in campaign contributions from the cable and satellite TV production & distribution sector than the average for all members of the House of Representatives...


Walden — the top sector recipient by far at $109,250, and its most vocal supporter — had the audacity to claim that keeping the internet neutral is an “unwarranted and overreaching government intrusion into the broadband marketplace.” Walden also happens to be Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and most importantly, the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, which has jurisdiction over the FCC...

http://www.occupydemocrats.com/meet-the-republicans-trying-to-sell-the-internet-to-the-highest-bidder/

There is a lot more at the link, but I thought that last part I emboldened really tells the tale here. The GOP representatives are doing what they do best, graft and extortion.

They oversee the FCC, can cut its funding, deny seating opposing voices and change the rules so the FCC has no teeth. The FCC was created by FDR to prevent exactly what has happened while some of the public took for granted what was once won, couldn't be lost.

I was making this OP on one tab on my browser when I found another OP with a much different take and made a reply of this. Please visit that thread as well to comment on what Moliere's OP says...

Former FCC Commissioner: “We Should Be Ashamed Of Ourselves” For State of Broadband In The U.S.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025119931

The main problem I have with this commissioner is that he is still singing in the free market choir that always leads to money = speech. It's a religion that has distorted freedom of speech and thought, and will stifle the intent of the First, to allow people to freely dispute TPTB. The free market will only speak for itself and profit. That is exactly what is being done with tiering.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
3. All the more reason to GOTV. This is how they control government agencies for their paymasters.
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 03:02 AM
Jun 2014
They do irrreparable harm to all of us...

Cha

(297,154 posts)
4. They're stupid and they want to kill us.. figuratively and literally. We Have to Win.
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 03:19 AM
Jun 2014

I think anyone who knows anything about this knows I'm not exaggerating.

bobGandolf

(871 posts)
6. This topic doesn't get all the glam and glitter....
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 03:27 AM
Jun 2014

but the impact of losing net neutrality will have a huge impact on freedom of speech world wide. IMO

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
7. It is NOT theirs to sell. It is a public good, and should be considered a utility, the same as
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 04:07 AM
Jun 2014

water or electricity. I hope somebody smart is on the case.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meet the Republicans tryi...