Hillary Clinton's views on post 9/11

sound pretty much like all the right wing apologist nonsense. Is this ok simply because she is a Democratic politician?

The Bush administration covered up Saudi links to al Qaeda. They didn't want a 9/11 Commission. How on earth does that suggest a good faith overreaction when they didn't want an investigation? FBI interrogation methods were working but for ulterior reasons they were ordered to make way for an absurd experimental ad hoc torture program. FBI agent Ali Soufan is on the record stating that the USS Cole investigation was obstructed. It should be noted that information about known al Qaeda operatives Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar was withheld in January 2000 when Bill Clinton was still in office. The withholding took place around the Millennium time frame when there was a lot of al Qaeda attack chatter. Former counterterrorist czar Richard Clarke is on the record stating that the CIA deliberately withheld the information about al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar. Former NSA Sandy Berger kept removing classified documents related to the Millennium threat period from the National Archives.

Should we dismiss all these questions and root for team Hillary? Are we out of line for coming to the conclusion that neither the Democrats or Republicans have been honest about 9/11?