Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,080 posts)
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 08:04 AM Jun 2014

Jason Hanna And Joe Riggs, Texas Gay Fathers, Denied Legal Parenthood Of Twin Sons

Some judges just love discrimination and persecution IMO. The gov. really needs to get out of relationship management and persecution.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/18/jason-hanna-and-joe-riggs_n_5506720.html?ir=Gay%20Voices&utm_campaign=061814&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-gay-voices&utm_content=Title

It’s heartbreaking to think that a state has erased the parents of children and put a family in legal jeopardy, simply because of discrimination against gay and lesbian couples. But that’s what happened to a gay couple in Texas after what they described as the "magical" birth of their twin boys.

Jason Hanna and Joe Riggs are the proud fathers of Lucas and Ethan, who were born in April, after they'd connected with a surrogate mom, CharLynn.

Each of the men is a biological father to one of the babies. But, because Texas has a ban on gay marriage (it was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge last February, but the decision was stayed pending appeal), and because a judge can use his or her own discretion in these cases, neither of the men is currently on the birth certificates of either of the boys, nor have they been able to co-adopt each other’s biological child.

Gay Father Explains How He and Husband Have No Legal Rights To The Others Child by SiriusXM News & Issues
Only the surrogate mother — who has no biological relationship to the boys, since embryos were transferred to her — is on the birth certificates. In essence, the men are not legally defined as the parents of their own children. And though they have DNA tests for proof, they’re worried, particularly if something were to happen to one of them while the other still has not been able to co-adopt the other’s biological child.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RKP5637

(67,080 posts)
3. Yep, that's where this all needs to go and hopefully SCOTUS will not make a stupid RW decision. n/t
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 09:50 AM
Jun 2014
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. I see straight people on DU claim that anti gay bigotry is not tied to institutions and powers
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 10:12 AM
Jun 2014

They present it as a minor personal flaw, it's 'just bigotry'. They say this in spite of the fact that Straight People have demanded and created legal discrimination in more than half of this nation.

RKP5637

(67,080 posts)
6. Absolutely true! I see it as an example of 'if it doesn't affect me, then out of sight out of mind
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 10:39 AM
Jun 2014

and who cares.' It's a selfish attitude IMO. This nation is full of all types of institutional and power bigotry/discrimination in many many areas.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jason Hanna And Joe Riggs...