Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 10:07 AM Jun 2014

Report: Hillary Clinton Pushed For Long-Term Troop Presence In Iraq

Report: Hillary Clinton Pushed For Long-Term Troop Presence In Iraq

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton aggressively advocated for a long-term U.S. troop presence in Iraq, according to a report Wednesday from the Daily Beast.

Clinton was joined by then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and then-CIA Director David Petraeus in pushing President Barack Obama to keep thousands of troops in the country before the U.S. military pulled out in 2011. Clinton was "particularly aggressive," the Daily Beast reported -- citing officials familiar with the negotiations for a status-of-forces agreement with Iraq.

“Hillary Clinton was a lion for keeping troops there,” James Jeffrey, U.S. ambassador to Iraq at the time, told the news outlet. “She was a strong advocate for keeping troops there past 2011."

It was a point of disagreement between Clinton and the Obama White House, according to the Daily Beast, the latter of which saw pulling troops out of Iraq as the fulfillment of a central campaign promise.

- more -

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-iraq-troop-presence-report

Hillary: 'I Couldn't Break Faith With' The Military To Renounce My Iraq War Vote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025107373


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
4. Of course you are being sarcastic, but she was pro war during the bushco invasion of Iraq. However,
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 12:07 PM
Jun 2014

she has said that was a terrible mistake she made voting for it. Regardless whether one believes her or not, I do not see very many Democrats who were for that war admitting that mistake, and of course there are no republicans who admit it


jwirr

(39,215 posts)
7. If she does not begin to understand that we are done with fighting for oil then she will not
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 12:16 PM
Jun 2014

understand the need to turn to alternatives.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
8. Someone studied the question...
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 12:18 PM
Jun 2014

For the cost of Iraq War, we could've built National 100% Renewable Clean Energy Grid. I kid you not.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/for-the-price-of-the-iraq-war-the-u-s-could-have-a-100-renewable-power-system/5330881

Think of the jobs! If we do it right, they wouldn't have to be in China.

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
9. It's the power grid they're trying to protect. And I don't mean power, as in electricity.
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 12:23 PM
Jun 2014

I mean power as in the kind that comes from capital ventures.

Shame on Hillary if takes us back to war.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
6. Hillary - long term means forever! These are religious wars plus the USA is in it to control these
Thu Jun 19, 2014, 12:14 PM
Jun 2014

groups for the oil. The last factor will only be satisfied to leave when the oil runs out. By then our country will have died from overstretch.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Hillary Clinton P...