General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you think this could have actually happened?
From DU archive
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2340537
Btw...Isn't James Carville the actual Super-PAC" Ready for Hillary"'s runner?
I heard before that Woodward was not trustworthy. But, I really does have doubts about Hillary's staff. And we here all new she had 2008 views long before it occured. So if the doubts of Carville is till there for some, why does she keeps hiring him and getting his advices? Well, it gaves a bad feeling and suspicion about the method of the Clinton clan. (Re: the almost- I feel your pain like statement of her an bill being dead broke....)
......
I really really came in the previous days , to read a lot of stuff on her,and NO ONLY RW PRESS, but also french lefty one, that quite disturbs me......
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)GMAFB!
no bias there at all....
Hekate
(90,646 posts)
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Posted: 04/15/2013 2:55 pm EDT | Updated: 04/15/2013 3:17 pm EDT
Democratic strategist and political pundit James Carville joined HuffPost Live Monday to discuss his role in Hillary Clinton's potential 2016 presidential campaign.
On April 4, it was reported that Carville had joined the "Ready For Hillary" super PAC, but Carville told host Mike Sacks the report wasn't exactly accurate.
"They asked me to sign something," Carville told HuffPost Live. "I'm not a member of it or anything like that but they're good guys and I said I'd sign it. Like most people, I hope she runs. But, I'm not a member of an organization or anything like that."
Carville went to discuss Hillary's hesitation to speak about whether or not she will run.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/james-carville-hillary-clinton-video_n_3086510.html
snooper2
(30,151 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Carville says, "they asked me to sign something," he doesn't say what that something was. I've responded to questions similarly; "what did X want?" My response, especially if I'm not interested in sharing with the person asking the question, "oh, she just wanted to tell me something." I think you're reading too much into what Carville said.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)So he is a member for me.....
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Carville said, "I'm not a member of it or anything like that but they're good guys and I said I'd sign it. Like most people, I hope she runs. But, I'm not a member of an organization or anything like that."
Don't let your anti-Hillary sentiment blind you to what's right in front of your face.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)How much clearer do you need Carville to make it?
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)I thought it was funny he didn't remember LOL
Anyway, I'm just waiting for the Carville/Matalin sex tape to come out 
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and you WANT to read something into it...
snooper2
(30,151 posts)
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Excerpt, translated:
Learn more about http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/monde/amerique-nord/etats-unis-operation-hillary-clinton-2016_1547054.html#HeOZjl1rEJGrMTMa.99
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Thanks any way. 
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Because on many sensitive issues, you are way more well informed from foreign media, that from your home one who often practice " self-censorship", in fear of some consequences...
elias49
(4,259 posts)witness The Guardian running stories that US news organizations don't pick up.
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)beyond 'ordinary' people's imagination.
