Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTim Koechlin: Inequality and the case for unions
This systematic attack on unions is, of course, bad for working Americans. Unionized workers in the US earn more money than non-union workers with similar skills (14 percent more, according to the Economic Policy Institute). Unionized workers are 28 percent more likely to have employer provided health insurance and 54 percent more likely to have employer provided pensions. Unionized workers enjoy more vacation time, and they are more productive than non-union workers. Countries with high rates of union coverage enjoy lower rates of inequality and lower rates of poverty, and their workers enjoy greater economic security. And, further, a robust union movement raises pay and working conditions for non-union workers as well.
Whats not to like?
In 1973, 27 percent of US workers were unionized. Now, its just 13 percent the lowest rate among the worlds rich (industrialized) countries. It is no coincidence that the U.S. is, by every reasonable measure, the most unequal of the worlds rich countries.
MORE HERE: http://wonkynewsnerd.com/case-for-unions/
Whats not to like?
In 1973, 27 percent of US workers were unionized. Now, its just 13 percent the lowest rate among the worlds rich (industrialized) countries. It is no coincidence that the U.S. is, by every reasonable measure, the most unequal of the worlds rich countries.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 592 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tim Koechlin: Inequality and the case for unions (Original Post)
LuckyTheDog
Jun 2014
OP
LisaLynne
(14,554 posts)1. I really liked this paragraph:
But arent unions prone to corruption? Sometimes (although way less often than right wingers would have us believe). And some parents are abusive. Some doctors commit fraud. And some bankers are greedy and mendacious. It does not follow that wed be better off without families, doctors, or a financial sector. Nor does it follow that workers are better off without unions.
Probably too much common sense for the average conservative to grasp, but the vast majority of the arguments against unions I've heard have been anecdotal evidence. "Oh, my brother in law is the laziest SOB around and his union helped him keep his job!" That sort of thing. They focus in, and get others to focus in, on one or two stories and miss the larger picture.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)2. Average Americans being anti-union is just suicidal idiocy.
Like they so hate the idea of their neighbor having a decent job with benefits that they'll sabotage themselves in the process.