Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyTheDog

(6,837 posts)
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:12 PM Jun 2014

Tim Koechlin: Inequality and the case for unions

This systematic attack on unions is, of course, bad for working Americans. Unionized workers in the US earn more money than non-union workers with similar skills (14 percent more, according to the Economic Policy Institute). Unionized workers are 28 percent more likely to have employer provided health insurance and 54 percent more likely to have employer provided pensions. Unionized workers enjoy more vacation time, and they are more productive than non-union workers. Countries with high rates of union coverage enjoy lower rates of inequality and lower rates of poverty, and their workers enjoy greater economic security. And, further, a robust union movement raises pay and working conditions for non-union workers as well.

What’s not to like?

In 1973, 27 percent of US workers were unionized. Now, it’s just 13 percent — the lowest rate among the world’s rich (“industrialized”) countries. It is no coincidence that the U.S. is, by every reasonable measure, the most unequal of the world’s rich countries.
MORE HERE: http://wonkynewsnerd.com/case-for-unions/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tim Koechlin: Inequality and the case for unions (Original Post) LuckyTheDog Jun 2014 OP
I really liked this paragraph: LisaLynne Jun 2014 #1
Average Americans being anti-union is just suicidal idiocy. nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #2

LisaLynne

(14,554 posts)
1. I really liked this paragraph:
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:25 PM
Jun 2014
But aren’t unions prone to corruption? Sometimes (although way less often than right wingers would have us believe). And some parents are abusive. Some doctors commit fraud. And some bankers are greedy and mendacious. It does not follow that we’d be better off without families, doctors, or a financial sector. Nor does it follow that workers are better off without unions.


Probably too much common sense for the average conservative to grasp, but the vast majority of the arguments against unions I've heard have been anecdotal evidence. "Oh, my brother in law is the laziest SOB around and his union helped him keep his job!" That sort of thing. They focus in, and get others to focus in, on one or two stories and miss the larger picture.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
2. Average Americans being anti-union is just suicidal idiocy.
Sun Jun 22, 2014, 03:28 PM
Jun 2014

Like they so hate the idea of their neighbor having a decent job with benefits that they'll sabotage themselves in the process.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tim Koechlin: Inequality ...