General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerican Bar Association: Lawyers can scour jurors' tweets, Facebook posts
SAN FRANCISCO Lawyers have been given the green light to scan the social media sites of jurors.
The American Bar Association says it's ethical for lawyers to scour online for publicly available musings of citizens called for jury service and even jurors in deliberations.
But the ABA does warn lawyers against actively "following" or "friending" jurors or otherwise invading their private Internet areas.
One company has gone so far as to develop a software product that promises to create a juror profile through social media posts and monitor jurors during the trial.
http://m.jacksonville.com/breaking-news/2014-06-22/story/american-bar-association-lawyers-can-scour-jurors-tweets-facebook
merrily
(45,251 posts)IOW, if I put something, like a tweet, for example, out on the internet, with my name, or with enough information to link me to the tweet, anyone can read it? My employer? A prospective employer? My neighbor? A lawyer interested in learning my views on crime, jury duty, etc.?
Is that what this news story is telling us?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Let's say you're going to trial for a civil or criminal matter. Prospective Juror Number 22 seems a good sort, fair-minded and honest. Your lawyer is ready to seat him on the jury when a paralegal tugs on the lawyer's sleeve with a Facebook page filled by Juror Number 22 and his demented ramblings about the jury system and how to subvert a trial by getting on a jury.
It would be malpractice for your lawyer to accept Juror Number 22 while ignoring such easily available public information. I'd want my lawyer checking every publicly available source for information on the potential jurors in the pool, including Twitter, Facebook and Linked In.