General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Obama Administration Picks a Fight With Teachers Unions
The Obama Administration Picks a Fight With Teachers UnionsArne Duncan, President Barack Obamas education secretary, was scorned last week by teachers union leaders and their supporters for applauding a California judges tentative ruling that the states teacher tenure laws are unconstitutional. This decision presents an opportunity for a progressive state with a tradition of innovation to build a new framework for the teaching profession that protects students rights to equal educational opportunities while providing teachers the support, respect, and rewarding careers they deserve, Duncan said.
Randi Weingarden, president of the American Federation of Teachers, chastised Duncan in an open letter for failing to defend Californias tenure rules. Teachers across the country are wondering why the secretary of education thinks that stripping them of their due process is the way to help all children succeed, Weingarten lamented in the letter, which was clearly meant to gird her members for battle.
The education writer Diane Ratvich, a staunch opponent of tenure reform efforts, went further, posting Duncans statement on the ruling on her website and arguing that it sounded like the words of a Republican. Not a word about the real causes of unequal opportunity: poverty and segregation, Ratvich wrote. Who would have believed that a Democratic administration would hail a court decision removing due process from public school teachers? Mitt Romneys Secretary of Education (had he won) could have issued this press release.
It is unexpected to see a top Obama administration official staking out a position so at odds with teachers unions. They are, after all, a key part of the the Democratic Partys base. But Duncans praise for Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rolf Treus June 10 decision speaks volumes about the rulings potential to change the public education system in the U.S.
The article states that the teachers involved in the ruling received tenure after just 18 months. I don't think that is or has been the issue. After all Florida teachers lost tenure and due process in 2011. Florida teachers could not have received tenure for 3 years. That was plenty of time for good decisions to be made. Those pushing this issue simply want teachers to lose due process.
If teachers can be fired at the whim of administrators, that leaves them vulnerable to angry students, frustrated parents who refuse to believe their child can do wrong....and administrators with a punitive attitude.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)And, Race to the Top is very bad policy.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)d_r
(6,907 posts)the biggest disappointment to me
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)No good has come from Duncan's ideas.
msongs
(67,361 posts)messenger?
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)There are so many angry teachers it can't be healthy for the party.
Unfortunately there are not any Democrats who differ with Obama enough to speak up for teachers..
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I have posted before one of my fears is what will the Democratic party platform be
on education for 2016?
It is crucial we get this turned around..so worrisome. We're talking about millions
of American children.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Take your time. I know this new territory (reality) may be difficult for you at first.....
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Obama has to know how this is turning out all wrong...he could do the right thing
and protect his legacy at the same time.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...please put on the glasses. Once you can ''see'' -- those kinds of questions won't even come up.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)On occasion, like after the Arkansas Democratic Primary 2010,
this Administration has expressed open hostility and ridicule toward Organized LABOR.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024586209
One can NOT say he supports "Free Trade",
and supports Organized LABOR at the same time.
The two positions are not compatible.
You will know them by their WORKS.
Omaha Steve
(99,497 posts)Rockyj
(538 posts)Isn't this what Mayor Rahm Emanuel has been doing in Chicago?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Just you wait; someone will be along very soon, I'm sure, to explain how this is really not the president's fault, or that it doesn't mean what it clearly says, or that you're just affected with ODS, or you don't understand the subtleties of undermining union security agreements.
Or something. But it'll be really good. And then you'll be sorry.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Yeah, I know what you mean. Was thinking the same thing. But so be it. I never thought Democrats would go after public school teachers like this.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)or Flip flops
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I support education. That means I support teachers. Anyone who doesn't does not support my principles and I will not make excuses for them. There is no way to explain Duncan's actions away. He hasn't gone rogue and is not a leftover from the previous administration.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Arne has been allowed to publicly insult teachers with impunity. There is no excuse. Other Democratic leaders are failing to speak out in defense, and that angers me.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Duncan said, This decision presents an opportunity for a progressive state with a tradition of innovation to build a new framework for the teaching profession that protects students rights to equal educational opportunities while providing teachers the support, respect, and rewarding careers they deserve, A Republican couldnt have said it any more anti-union.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Carter so it has gone both ways.
However, it was Obama's chance to make amends, and he did it in a half assed way
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)Tell me how that nonsense from Duncan is any different. Doing away with due process for teachers is "supporting, respecting and rewarding" them.
erodriguez
(656 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Like, can they use this to get rid of teachers so that none of them ever get to reach their pensions? I am not all that worried about 3 year teachers. I am worried about 18 year teachers. There must be tremendous pressure on the School Administrators to make sure that no one gets a pension--the way there is in private industry, unless you have a good union or your side. Does this make it easier to get rid of someone right before they qualify for a pension?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Arne Duncan. He has made some good ones too, but Arne is one of the worst among some really bad picks. Arnie needs to go.
OK. Obama supporters.
Here is the question. Obama has had six years.
Tell me. What has he done to improve our public schools?
Tell me about it. If he has done anything at all, I haven't heard about it from his administration or the news media. Six years. Charter schools have replaced truly public schools. Has that improved anything?
I see bright kids in public schools who are so sick or so scared of taking tests that they don't even want to go to school any more.
Back in the 40s and 50s when I went to school, children who were bright enjoyed it. Teachers loved their students and their work.
How do the charter schools compare to the old-fashioned public schools in terms of those test scores?
The problem today is not in the schools. It's in the homes of the children. Parents are not preparing their children to learn, to sit and obey in the classroom.
My mother told me the other day that when we were children, she read to us every night (I remember it clearly. The Little Train That Could, Lassie Come Home, Bambi (we cried).), and when we were small, she had two reading sessions every night, one with the two of us who were older and one with the two little ones. One of my sisters was dyslexic. Never mind. My mother pointed her finger at each word as she read to us, moving our eyes from left to right, left to right. My dyslexic sister reads and reads and reads. That's something a parent can do best -- read bed-time stories, instill a love of learning, develop a child's natural curiosity (like talking about how hard those scary spiders work in the garden) and assist with a child's special needs.
What children need in the classroom is secure teachers who can devote themselves to loving their students and to developing lesson plans that respond to their student's interests and community and world events.
What is not needed is teachers who are harassed and afraid for their jobs.
If children cannot learn in school, parents need to criticize their own child-rearing methods.
Here is how the classrooms of the 1940s and 1950s looked. The children who went to those schools became the rocket scientists, surgeons, judges and leaders of the next generation. Teachers did not meet the academic standards they meet today, but they infused students with a love of learning.
Leave our teachers alone.
To honor our teachers and shame Arnie Duncan:
http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/08/26/art-entertainment/rockwells-school-teachers.html
Happy Birthday, Miss Jones
By Norman Rockwell
March 17, 1956
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Is "teacher" tenure different from "professor" tenure? Some of the arguments say teachers with tenure "can never" be fired for (insert reason). I can't believe that, don't think "can never" even applies to the pope. I'm mucked up with this.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Not sure what it means to professors.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)communities. Teachers are the scapegoats of our time.
Some of our best teachers teach in inner-city schools. Many of our worst students attend those schools. Some responsibility has to be borne by the parents who send their children to school with the attitude that the teachers are the worst. I've had friends who taught in troubled areas and who were master teachers. In one case, my friend won awards for her innovative teaching at the high school level. She had to leave teaching because one of her students injured her -- in the classroom.
When my children were in school, our local high school was named one of the worst in our city. My daughter attended that school and then graduated from college Phi Beta Kappa. The parents' complaints are absurd. Make sure your child is prepared for first grade, and if your child can't sit still long enough and can't yet obey, hold your child back a year. A child's maturity is everything when it comes to education.
Read to your children EVERY NIGHT. No exceptions. Last thing your child should be thinking about at night is how wonderful it is to read. Take your child to museums. In most cities, that is very easy. Teach your child to take responsibility. No excuses. If our child has a learning disability, work with his/her teachers to help your child. Make a pest of yourself but do it in a friendly way.
Teachers in our schools are really well trained.
Unfortunately, we don't train parents at all. What we need is more parent-education.
My mother used to say that the worst thing you could do for a child who was not doing well in school was to criticize the teacher. When you criticize the teacher, you are teaching your child not to take responsibility. Hey! We have wonderful public libraries. And today we even have the internet which is available in most libraries. Many of the best educated adults in our society got a lot of their education in the public library. There is no excuse for a child who can't learn in school according to his ability. And the best students are not always what test administrators would call the "brightest" or most "gifted," but simply the hardest-working.
That's my rant on education.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I remember not long ago when parents did not blame teachers first. Most took time to get to the bottom of a situation.
When only the teacher is blamed the student is off the hook for accountability.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Learning is an equation that involves a mysterious factor that cannot be analyzed mathematically and may or may not show up in test scores. The teacher's task is to instill a love of questioning and learning. The tests that are now being given in classrooms across the country do not measure the love of questioning and learning.
The capacity to take responsibility for one's own failures is a character trait that we need to instill in our children. If your child is failing math, you need to work with your child so that your child stubbornly masters what is difficult. Your child may never be a math genius, but learning to take responsibility, learning to work and work and not giving up -- those are character traits that will be more important to your child than math but may be, depending on the child and how difficult math is for the child, the most important lesson he or she learns in his or her life.
A big part of intelligence in my opinion is determination, not taking failure for an answer.
Uncle Joe
(58,284 posts)Thanks for the thread, madfloridian.
Omaha Steve
(99,497 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Thanks for the link.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R
Someone Should Tell Hillary She's Part of the 1 Percent
[center]"All great truths begin as blasphemies." ~George Bernard Shaw[/center]
Skittles
(153,113 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)BFEE wants it all.
Bush Profiteers Collect Billions From No Child Left Behind
April 30, 2010
Source: Diatribune and Daily Kos, March, 30, 2007
Title: Bush Profiteers Collect Billions From NCLB
Author: Mandevilla
Researchers: Alan Scher and Sam Burchard
Faculty Evaluator: Karen Grady, PhD
The architect of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), President Bushs first senior education advisor, Sandy Kress, has turned the program, which has consistently proven disastrous in the realm of education, into a huge success in the realm of corporate profiteering. After ushering NCLB through the US House of Representatives in 2001 with no public hearings, Kress went from lawmakerturning on spigots of federal fundsto lobbyist, tapping into those billions of dollars in federal funds for private investors well connected to the Bush administration.
A statute that once promised equal access to public education to millions of American children now instead promises billions of dollars in profits to corporate clients through dubious processes of testing and assessment and supplemental educational services. NCLBthe Business Roundtables revision of Lyndon Johnsons Education and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)created a high stakes testing system through which the private sector could siphon federal education funds. The result has been windfall corporate profit. What was once a cottage industry has become a corporate giant. Millions of dollars are being spent, says Jack Jennings, director of the Center on Education Policy, and nobody knows whats happening.
The wedding of big business and education benefits not only the interests of the Business Roundtable, a consortium of over 300 CEOs, but countless Bush family loyalists. Sandy Kress, chief architect of NCLB; Harold McGraw III, textbook publisher; Bill Bennett, former Reagan education secretary; and Neil Bush, the presidents youngest brother, have all cashed in on the Roundtables successful national implementation of outcome-based education. NCLBs mandated system of state standards, state tests, and school sanctions has together transformed our public school system into a for-profit frenzy.
Kress, former president of the Dallas School Board, began A Draft Position for George W. Bush on K-12 Education as early as 1999. Working successfully with then-Governor Bush in Texas for years, the Democrat bolstered bipartisan support behind the compassionate marketing promise to leave no child behind through the adoption of high state standards measuring school performance. Signed into law in early 2002, NCLB dramatically extended the federal role in public education, mandating annual testing of children in Grades 3 to 8, providing tutoring for children in persistently failing schools, and setting a twelve-year timetable for closing chronic gaps in student achievement. Having then crafted the legislation, Kress transitioned from public servant to corporate lobbyist, guiding clients to the troth of federal funds. By 2005 he had made upwards of $4 million from lobbying contracts.
While the Business Roundtable maintains that the high-stakes tests administered nationwide hold schools accountable to Adequate Yearly Progress, NCLB has instead benefited the testing industry in the amount of between $1.9 and $5.3 billion a year. NCLB requires states to produce interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports, all of which are provided at a price by members of the industry. Among these are the top four or five players in the textbook market, including the Big ThreeMcGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin, and Harcourt Generalwho have, since the passage of NCLB, come to dominate the testing market. Identified by Wall Street analysts in the wake of the 2000 election as Bush stocks, all three represent owners like Harold McGraw III, who has longstanding ties to the Bush administration and the lobbying efforts of Sandy Kress.
Other Kress clients, including Ignite! Learning, a company headed by Neil Bush, and K12 Inc., a for-profit enterprise owned by Bill Bennett, tailored themselves to vie for NCLB dollars.
Under NCLB, as school districts receive federal funding they are required by law to hold 20 percent of those funds aside, anticipating that its schools will fail to meet its Annual Yearly Progress formula. When that failure is certified by test scores, the district is required to use those set-aside federal funds to pay supplemental education service (SES) providers. Ignite! has placed products in forty US school districts, and K12 offers a menu of services as an option to traditional brick-and-mortar schools, including computer-based virtual academies, that have qualified for over $4 million in federal grants. Under NCLB, supplemental educational services, whose results are being increasingly challenged, reap $2 billion annually.
Nationally, there are over 1,800 approved providers of supplemental educational services, but little in the way of regulation. To the contrary, Michael Petrilli, former member of the Department of Education, purports, We want as little regulation as possible so the market can be as vibrant as possible. To that end, Kress is currently lobbying on behalf of another bipartisan coalition to win reauthorization of NCLB for another six years.
SOURCE: http://www.projectcensored.org/12-bush-profiteers-collect-billions-from-no-child-left-behind/
That analysis was in 2010 using numbers from '07. Can only guess what the latest would show. Gotta a good idea of who they're gonna favor.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)on his first day in office. Instead he ramped it up.
I predict the president will get big money from big insurance AND the school profiteers in 2017
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Or...maybe teachers are all racists.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I was quoting from them, so I was not free to change their horrible spelling. They should have taken time to look up the right spelling. Inexcusable.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)BTW there are said to be at least 48,000 Bad Ass Teachers now. Membership growing. They just had a no confidence vote on Arne Duncan.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Bad, bad choice by Obama to choose this clown.
But I guess this is the direction Obama wants to take our education system.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)happynewyear
(1,724 posts)I agree with others on this thread, this man needs to resign! This is not good, not good at all!