General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Begin Shift To The Right After Cantor's Defeat
Republicans Begin Shift To The Right After Cantor's Defeat
Sahil Kapur June 23, 2014, 6:00 AM EDT
If anyone doubted that the Republican Party would become more conservative after the ousting of Eric Cantor, his successor put those doubts to rest over the weekend.
In an interview with Fox News, incoming House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) revealed leadership's first significant policy shift: opposition to reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank when its current charter expires on Sept. 30, a move that would shutter the credit agency.
"One of the problems with government is it's going to take hard earned money so others do things that the private sector can do. That's what Ex-Im Bank does," he said. "I think Ex-Im Bank is one that government does not have to be involved in. The private sector can do it."
The Ex-Im Bank, first established in 1934, is tasked with boosting the exports of American goods and services through loans and guarantees. In fiscal year 2013, the Ex-Im bank supported $37.4 billion in U.S. exports and 205,000 export-related American jobs, the agency estimated.
snip//
McCarthy also shifted his tone on the issue of immigration reform. In January, the Californian, who hails from a district that is 35 percent Hispanic, championed "legal status that will allow [people living in the U.S. illegally] to work and pay taxes."
On Sunday McCarthy was singing a different tune, telling Fox News that the House should do "nothing about immigration until we secure the borders." He added: "The borders are not secure." He didn't specify what would constitute a secure border, leaving enough room to oppose immigration reform no matter what happens at the border.
more...
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republicans-shift-right-after-cantor-defeat
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)It may be hard to imagine going any further to the right than we already are, but all of the evidence points to Martha Mitchell's prophecy apparently having not been totally fulfilled (see my sig).
Reagan, it appears, was just the appetizer. I think we may have Cruz or maybe Paul for the main course. Hopefully we can pass on the dessert...
villager
(26,001 posts)No "middle way" is any longer possible...
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)The problem is a big one. We got lucky in 2008, and avoided another Great Depression solely because a Dem was elected just 2 months into the event that really sent the economy into a death spiral. Next time I'm reasonably certain there'll be a Rep there, and the spiral won't be arrested.
On a technical sidenote, most people don't realize that Keynes was very specific back in the thirties: only fiscal policy - deficit spending - can get you out of a liquidity trap, which is what both the thirties and 2008 were all about. The Fed can't do it. Everyone watches them, but really, they're powerless to help the economy. The only real way to do it is in fiscal policy, and unfortunately that is under legislative control, unlike the Fed, which is at least nominally independent. So there really is no choice when it comes to digging yourself out of a crisis of that magnitude: you either have a government that gets it and does what is needed, or you don't. We got lucky and did (although a follow-up to the stimulus was really needed to put the economy permanently back on track, a follow-up we have been denied by the success of the Tea Party), Europe has been unlucky and had unending austerity and massive unemployment. You need only look at Europe to realize just how powerless central banks and monetary policy are in the face of a real crisis.