Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,035 posts)
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 07:53 PM Jun 2014

Republicans Begin Shift To The Right After Cantor's Defeat




Republicans Begin Shift To The Right After Cantor's Defeat
Sahil Kapur – June 23, 2014, 6:00 AM EDT


If anyone doubted that the Republican Party would become more conservative after the ousting of Eric Cantor, his successor put those doubts to rest over the weekend.

In an interview with Fox News, incoming House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) revealed leadership's first significant policy shift: opposition to reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank when its current charter expires on Sept. 30, a move that would shutter the credit agency.

"One of the problems with government is it's going to take hard earned money so others do things that the private sector can do. That's what Ex-Im Bank does," he said. "I think Ex-Im Bank is one that government does not have to be involved in. The private sector can do it."

The Ex-Im Bank, first established in 1934, is tasked with boosting the exports of American goods and services through loans and guarantees. In fiscal year 2013, the Ex-Im bank supported $37.4 billion in U.S. exports and 205,000 export-related American jobs, the agency estimated.

snip//

McCarthy also shifted his tone on the issue of immigration reform. In January, the Californian, who hails from a district that is 35 percent Hispanic, championed "legal status that will allow [people living in the U.S. illegally] to work and pay taxes."

On Sunday McCarthy was singing a different tune, telling Fox News that the House should do "nothing about immigration until we secure the borders." He added: "The borders are not secure." He didn't specify what would constitute a secure border, leaving enough room to oppose immigration reform no matter what happens at the border.

more...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/republicans-shift-right-after-cantor-defeat
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans Begin Shift To The Right After Cantor's Defeat (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2014 OP
Yeah, this is what that defeat meant. Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2014 #1
There are only two possible outcomes: The end of the GOP, or the end of the U.S. villager Jun 2014 #2
True. Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2014 #3

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
1. Yeah, this is what that defeat meant.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 08:03 PM
Jun 2014

It may be hard to imagine going any further to the right than we already are, but all of the evidence points to Martha Mitchell's prophecy apparently having not been totally fulfilled (see my sig).
Reagan, it appears, was just the appetizer. I think we may have Cruz or maybe Paul for the main course. Hopefully we can pass on the dessert...

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
2. There are only two possible outcomes: The end of the GOP, or the end of the U.S.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jun 2014

No "middle way" is any longer possible...

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
3. True.
Mon Jun 23, 2014, 08:44 PM
Jun 2014

The problem is a big one. We got lucky in 2008, and avoided another Great Depression solely because a Dem was elected just 2 months into the event that really sent the economy into a death spiral. Next time I'm reasonably certain there'll be a Rep there, and the spiral won't be arrested.
On a technical sidenote, most people don't realize that Keynes was very specific back in the thirties: only fiscal policy - deficit spending - can get you out of a liquidity trap, which is what both the thirties and 2008 were all about. The Fed can't do it. Everyone watches them, but really, they're powerless to help the economy. The only real way to do it is in fiscal policy, and unfortunately that is under legislative control, unlike the Fed, which is at least nominally independent. So there really is no choice when it comes to digging yourself out of a crisis of that magnitude: you either have a government that gets it and does what is needed, or you don't. We got lucky and did (although a follow-up to the stimulus was really needed to put the economy permanently back on track, a follow-up we have been denied by the success of the Tea Party), Europe has been unlucky and had unending austerity and massive unemployment. You need only look at Europe to realize just how powerless central banks and monetary policy are in the face of a real crisis.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans Begin Shift T...