Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(117,949 posts)
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 07:42 AM Jun 2014

The Legal Price of Adultery Goes Down

North Carolina and West Virginia Abandon Heartbalm Actions
Joanna L. Grossman and Lawrence M. Friedman
June 24, 2014

... Historically, there were two causes of action that might allow a man to sue his wife’s lover, or a woman to sue her husband’s mistress: criminal “conversation” and alienation of affection (collectively known, along with some others, as “heartbalm” actions). Most states have long since thrown these claims into the ashbin of history, but North Carolina, along with only a small number of other states, has up to now stubbornly preserved them. In a recent ruling, Rothrock v. Cooke, a lower court judge in North Carolina has decided that enough is enough ...

A plaintiff has a case for alienation of affections if he or she can show a happy marriage (a marriage of “genuine love and affection”) which the wicked defendant had “alienated and destroyed,” through “wrongful and malicious acts.” To win a case of “criminal conversation,” a married plaintiff has to show that the defendant, during the marriage, had sexual intercourse with the plaintiff’s spouse. “Criminal conversation” is a rather odd label for this kind of lawsuit: first of all, it is not a criminal case; and secondly, the gist of it is hardly “conversation;” it is sex plain and simple ...

... Claims of blackmail and extortion were behind a number of the legislative moves to abolish these causes of action. But there was surely an even deeper reason for the decline and fall of these doctrines. Victorian sensibilities themselves gradually entered a stage of decline and fall ...

Judge Craig’s opinion in the Rothrock case more or less makes this point, although hidden behind a dense thicket of legal verbiage. His central argument, which seems a bit far-fetched, is that these causes of action are offenses against freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and the right of privacy. Alienation of affections, he says, “explicitly seeks to punish the expression of friendliness, affection or intimacy by consenting partners and effectively restrains those consenting parties from engaging in free expression.” Criminal conversation too “punishes all expression of affection or intimacy in the form of consensual sexual conduct between individuals” ...


http://verdict.justia.com/2014/06/24/legal-price-adultery-goes

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Legal Price of Adultery Goes Down (Original Post) struggle4progress Jun 2014 OP
Maybe the price of adultery should go up. LWolf Jun 2014 #1

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
1. Maybe the price of adultery should go up.
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 12:26 PM
Jun 2014

Then maybe marriage would become less common, and more successful because of it. Or maybe it would simply become extinct.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Legal Price of Adulte...