Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 04:18 PM Jun 2014

Federal judge rules U.S. no-fly list violates Constitution

(Reuters) - The U.S. government's no-fly list banning people accused of links to terrorism from commercial flights violates their constitutional rights because it gives them no meaningful way to contest that decision, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Anna Brown, ruling on a lawsuit filed in federal court in Oregon by 13 Muslim Americans who were branded with the no-fly status, ordered the government to come up with new procedures that allow people on the no-fly list to challenge that designation.

"The court concludes international travel is not a mere convenience or luxury in this modern world. Indeed, for many international travel is a necessary aspect of liberties sacred to members of a free society," Brown wrote in her 65-page ruling.

"Accordingly, on this record the court concludes plaintiffs inclusion on the no-fly list constitutes a significant deprivation of their liberty interests in international travel," Brown said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/24/us-usa-noflylist-idUSKBN0EZ2EU20140624


Excellent. The no-fly list in its current form is a Kafkaesque obscenity. If they want to put people on the no-fly list as a criminal penalty, part of the punishment for people found guilty in court beyond a reasonable doubt, and having the normal right of appeal, fine. But nobody should be arbitrarily deprived of the right to fly as they are under the current system.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. Judge Anna Brown? It must be Oregon
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 04:30 PM
Jun 2014

We'll see if this ruling stands up on appeal. I wonder if the Department of Justice will energetically contest the ruling or if it will shrug and say, "You know, the rights of our citizens come first. Fear-mongering and hyperbole really aren't any way to run the country."

Hey, it could happen! Or not.

Louisiana1976

(3,962 posts)
2. That's good news. The no-fly list is a crock. I've heard of innocent people including
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jun 2014

children ending up on that list.

hlthe2b

(101,534 posts)
3. About time-- how many years has this been used to indiscriminately ruin people's livelihood & rights
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 05:25 PM
Jun 2014

now?

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
4. Excellent....there should be a way to maintain the list, but also reasonably challenge the
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jun 2014

designation.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
5. I say kill the list altogether - the fish stinks from the head down
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jun 2014

We'll be purging ourselves of at least one remnant of the Bush administration, and that's a good thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal judge rules U.S. ...