Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,056 posts)
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 06:25 PM Jun 2014

Democrat Laughs in Do-Nothing John Boehner’s Face For Suing Obama



Democrat Laughs in Do-Nothing John Boehner’s Face For Suing Obama
By: Sarah Jones
Wednesday, June, 25th, 2014, 6:05 pm


Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) seems to have found Speaker Boehner’s hubris hard to swallow today.

On the heels of Boehner’s announcement that the Republican Party will be doing what it always does when a Democrat is in office — sue and try to impeach (after obstruction and ginning up scandals) — Pocan laughed in Boehner’s face with a statement denouncing the Speaker for his historically lazy House that tried to shut the government down just last year.

“With Speaker Boehner and the Tea Party at the helm, this Congress has failed to act on vital legislation to help improve the lives of Americans. The same Speaker who allowed the government to shut down last October, now intends to sue the President of the United States for acting while Congress has not, instead voting to repeal the Affordable Care Act 54 times and turning the tragedy in Benghazi into a manufactured scandal.

“In fact, the least productive Congress in modern history – the so-called ‘Do-nothing Congress’ of 1948 – passed 350 bills in their first year; this Congress passed fewer than 100 bills in its first year. It is ironic the Speaker would sue the President for doing his job while the House of Representatives fails to do its job.

“Speaker Boehner is allowing the Tea Party tail to wag the dog. It is clear he has chosen to be the Speaker for the extreme right-wing of the Republican Party. Unfortunately, this Republican controlled House of Representatives has no intention of actually governing and will continue to block any effort by President Obama at the expense of our constituents.”


more...

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/06/25/democrat-laughs-do-nothing-john-boehners-face-suing-obama-legislating.html
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrat Laughs in Do-Nothing John Boehner’s Face For Suing Obama (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2014 OP
They don't want to "take our country back." They just want to destroy our government. nt kelliekat44 Jun 2014 #1
Exactly. They don't want the government in a position where it can do good Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #3
The rank and file idiots voting for them, who is barely surviving, needs to starve randys1 Jun 2014 #51
100% agree. nt cstanleytech Jun 2014 #14
They want to "take it back" to the freaking stone age. Cha Jun 2014 #19
How About ... bayareaboy Jun 2014 #47
How about taking it back to the fifties WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #50
Unless they mean Jamaal510 Jun 2014 #31
Oh, they want to "take our country back" alright. Aerows Jun 2014 #52
The only quibble I have with Pocan's statement gratuitous Jun 2014 #2
It's in keeping with Boehner's motto: 'We're not here to make laws, we're here to repeal them.' freshwest Jun 2014 #7
"Freedom" has become the code word gratuitous Jun 2014 #9
For a Republican these days, freedom means only the freedom to-- eridani Jun 2014 #33
Crosseyed? Scarsdale Jun 2014 #37
YUP!... Plucketeer Jun 2014 #44
Freedom doesn't mean free to do whatever you want to... Beartracks Jun 2014 #49
Freedumb Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2014 #13
agree mountain grammy Jun 2014 #24
K and R bigwillq Jun 2014 #4
Thanks for bringing this. From the link: freshwest Jun 2014 #5
Boner and the Boys... sheshe2 Jun 2014 #18
Bad darrymaine Jun 2014 #6
Welcone to DU. William769 Jun 2014 #8
Your first post and that is all you have to say???? movonne Jun 2014 #12
He said it twice though! :) Cha Jun 2014 #21
If something's worth saying... cui bono Jun 2014 #28
Wrong! Scarsdale Jun 2014 #38
What??? I think you responded to the wrong post. n/t cui bono Jun 2014 #57
Bad? Bad first post? Bad Pocan? Scuba Jun 2014 #16
I'll give the benefit of the doubt and assume they mean "bad Boehner." totodeinhere Jun 2014 #23
Shamone! yodermon Jun 2014 #26
You're going to make Boehner cry Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2014 #10
Lol! Not hard to do since he's stuck in cry-baby mode since forever! hue Jun 2014 #42
Obama can always counter sue. rocktivity Jun 2014 #11
Mark Pocan is a fine Wisconsin Democrat, of the traditional values wing of the Party. Scuba Jun 2014 #15
I thought republicans were concerned with frivilous lawsuits? rpannier Jun 2014 #17
Brilliant statement from Rep Mark Pocan of Wisconsin! mahalo babylonsistah~ Cha Jun 2014 #20
Most of the bills passed by asshole crazy tea bagger house were for Iliyah Jun 2014 #22
Couple of pertinent Tweet Quotes from Press Sec Josh Earnest on this.. lol Cha Jun 2014 #25
K&R n/t lordsummerisle Jun 2014 #27
Apparently those 22 million or so e-mails from the Bushies WH Iliyah Jun 2014 #29
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #30
Ziiiiiing!! ffr Jun 2014 #32
Can the American people sue the republican congress? B Calm Jun 2014 #34
K&R gademocrat7 Jun 2014 #35
Lawsuit Scarsdale Jun 2014 #36
Answer it with war crime prosecutions. grahamhgreen Jun 2014 #39
Bingo! B Calm Jun 2014 #43
Proud to have voted for Pocan every time his name AllyCat Jun 2014 #40
Great to see Pocan is speaking out & getting some press coverage!! Thanks Pocan!! hue Jun 2014 #41
I commend him, but where are the other Dems? QuestForSense Jun 2014 #45
I'm not an attorney but, ....... HenryWallace Jun 2014 #46
In what court would Boehner be able to sue and on waht standing? pam4water Jun 2014 #48
"...the Speaker would sue the President for doing his job" WinstonSmith4740 Jun 2014 #53
Well Said... supercats Jun 2014 #54
BAM! n/t ColesCountyDem Jun 2014 #55
My nephew's great grandfathers were born in the US treestar Jun 2014 #56

Louisiana1976

(3,962 posts)
3. Exactly. They don't want the government in a position where it can do good
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 06:36 PM
Jun 2014

for people. Thus voting to repeal the ACA 54 times and Benghazi.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
51. The rank and file idiots voting for them, who is barely surviving, needs to starve
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 02:10 PM
Jun 2014

for a while, to figure out that a vote for a con is a vote for death...

plain and simple

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
50. How about taking it back to the fifties
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jun 2014

with our present day civil rights and environmental protections.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
52. Oh, they want to "take our country back" alright.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 02:54 PM
Jun 2014

They want to take so much of it back that everyone but them and their cronies are poverty stricken to the point of being serfs. Far too many in Washington DC see politics as a path to wealth and power rather than being an honest servant of the people that want prosperity for the whole nation.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. The only quibble I have with Pocan's statement
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 06:35 PM
Jun 2014

The idea that it's the Tea Party tail wagging the Republican dog is debatable. The way the Republicans have been operating over the last three years, they haven't made much of an effort to repudiate the Tea Baggers or distance themselves from that special brand of political lunacy.

Other than that, Pocan's statement is spot on. I wonder if anyone in the popular media will pick up on it? There seems to be one particularly juicy point that even the chucktodds can understand: The current Congress' output versus the infamous "Do-Nothing Congress" of 1948. The 1948 Congress looks positively frenetic compared to Boehner's stewardship over the House.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
7. It's in keeping with Boehner's motto: 'We're not here to make laws, we're here to repeal them.'
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 07:01 PM
Jun 2014
Because... FREEDOM and all of that!

How Freedom Became Tyranny

Rightwing libertarians have turned “freedom” into an excuse for greed and exploitation.

George Monbiot - December 19, 2011

Freedom: who could object? Yet this word is now used to justify a thousand forms of exploitation. Throughout the rightwing press and blogosphere, among thinktanks and governments, the word excuses every assault on the lives of the poor, every form of inequality and intrusion to which the 1% subject us. How did libertarianism, once a noble impulse, become synonymous with injustice?

In the name of freedom – freedom from regulation – the banks were permitted to wreck the economy. In the name of freedom, taxes for the super-rich are cut. In the name of freedom, companies lobby to drop the minimum wage and raise working hours. In the same cause, US insurers lobby Congress to thwart effective public healthcare; the government rips up our planning laws; big business trashes the biosphere. This is the freedom of the powerful to exploit the weak, the rich to exploit the poor.

Right-wing libertarianism recognises few legitimate constraints on the power to act, regardless of the impact on the lives of others. In the UK it is forcefully promoted by groups like the TaxPayers’ Alliance, the Adam Smith Institute, the Institute of Economic Affairs and Policy Exchange. Their conception of freedom looks to me like nothing but a justification for greed.

So why have we been been so slow to challenge this concept of liberty? I believe that one of the reasons is as follows. The great political conflict of our age – between neocons and the millionaires and corporations they support on one side and social justice campaigners and environmentalists on the other – has been mischaracterised as a clash between negative and positive freedoms.


More at the link about the meaning of positive and negative freedoms and how the word is being used against us:

http://www.monbiot.com/2011/12/19/how-freedom-became-tyranny/

This is what the Republicans have been about for a long time. The Tea Party just serves as their shock troops to implement their real policy faster.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
9. "Freedom" has become the code word
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 07:40 PM
Jun 2014

Exploitation pretty well captures it. For the privileged few who have successfully gamed the system for the past 35 years, "freedom" has become their go-to word meaning, "We want our privilege cast in amber, never to be lost. The only acceptable change must tilt things even further in our favor."

History teaches us that it never ends well for the exploiters. Our efforts are as much about saving their miserable, worthless carcasses as it is in moving toward a more just, equitable society.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
33. For a Republican these days, freedom means only the freedom to--
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:16 AM
Jun 2014

--shit in the reservoir and personally execute anyone who looks at you cross-eyed.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
44. YUP!...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 10:14 AM
Jun 2014

Freedom - in GOP-speak - is as honest a phrase as "Americans for Prosperity" is about aiming to make all Americans prosperous.

Beartracks

(12,807 posts)
49. Freedom doesn't mean free to do whatever you want to...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 12:54 PM
Jun 2014

... It means freedom from having things done TO you.

Saw that on Twitter the other day.

-----------------

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. Thanks for bringing this. From the link:
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 06:43 PM
Jun 2014
In July of 2013, I reported on the Double-Down-Do-Nothings for PoliticusUSA, “You might have thought the 112th Congress’ historic low of 23 legislative items passed at this same last year was the epic fail, but you’ll have to revise that. This 113th Congress has only passed 15 legislative items at the 6 month mark.” None of the 15 legislative items were of any significance, either.

Oh, that was harsh. But then he gets right down to it:

On January first, House Republican leadership unveiled the new House work calendar revealing that the House would only be in session for 97 days prior to Election Day and 112 days through the end of the year. That’s a Do-Noting-Double-Down.

As Jason Easley pointed out earlier today, this lawsuit is all about impeachment proceedings against President Obama. Speaker Boehner denies this, but this is how the Clinton impeachment started. Boehner claims he’s doing this to keep Obama from destroying the integrity of the office, but that claim is laughable given how Republicans rolled out the red carpet for Bush’s gross expansion of executive branch power. It’s okay when other presidents do it, but it’s not okay when Obama does it.


Despicable Kochroaches, the whole bunch of them!

sheshe2

(83,729 posts)
18. Boner and the Boys...
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jun 2014
Boehner claims he’s doing this to keep Obama from destroying the integrity of the office, but that claim is laughable given how Republicans rolled out the red carpet for Bush’s gross expansion of executive branch power.


They have already destroyed the "INTEGRITY" of the office. Relentlessly without remorse. I don't know where to start. They are willfully ignorant, cruel beyond reason to the American people and want anyone less than the 1% to be destroyed. Patriots? No they are not. They want to bring America to her knees, that is their objective. They do it with a passionate cruelty, they lost their humanity a long time ago, their souls are dead their bodies just haven't registered that fact yet.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
38. Wrong!
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 07:56 AM
Jun 2014

These clowns held a meeting while President Obama was being innaugurated, vowing to block anything he tried to do. The FIRST time he was sworn in. What do they think THEY were elected to do - the people's business. They have done only the Koch business, ignoring regular citizens. IF Boehner EVER sobers up, he will owe apologies to us all for the damage he has done, with the help of his cohorts. $$$ definitely trumps a vote it seems.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
23. I'll give the benefit of the doubt and assume they mean "bad Boehner."
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 09:15 PM
Jun 2014

And if that's what they mean they are correct.

rocktivity

(44,575 posts)
11. Obama can always counter sue.
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 08:07 PM
Jun 2014

And maybe we voters can turn into a class action countersuit! If we don't want to wait until November that is!


rocktivity

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
22. Most of the bills passed by asshole crazy tea bagger house were for
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 09:13 PM
Jun 2014

the bidding of their corporate masters and screwing with women's bodies.

Cha

(297,124 posts)
25. Couple of pertinent Tweet Quotes from Press Sec Josh Earnest on this.. lol
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 10:27 PM
Jun 2014

Mark Knoller ✔ @markknoller
Follow
Despite Boehner lawsuit plan, @PressSec says Pres Obama not rethinking his "pen and a phone" strategy to pursue exec actions on his own.
7:35 AM - 25 Jun 2014
18 Retweets

Sabrina @Charmed86
Follow
Josh - I'm looking forward to the republican "taxed funded lawsuit against the President for doing his job" LMAO
7:37 AM - 25 Jun 2014
15 Retweets 7 favorites

TOD

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
29. Apparently those 22 million or so e-mails from the Bushies WH
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 12:21 AM
Jun 2014

which were conveniently found on Repigs hard drives have been mysterious found and I fear that GOP fear something ugly made pop its ugly head and further expose them what they are which in my opinion is not patriotic.

ffr

(22,668 posts)
32. Ziiiiiing!!
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:45 AM
Jun 2014

Now that's what I call going on the offensive! Keep exposing those dirty bastards for the lazy money sucking slobs they are.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
36. Lawsuit
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 07:47 AM
Jun 2014

"We, the People"should sue these lazy representatives. They were elected to do a job, which they do not do. All they have done since President Obama was ELECTED by the citizens, is disrupt, waste time. Why should taxpayers be saddled with their medical coverage and pension plan? DEFUND these millionaires, let them pay their own expenses. If not for us, Cheney would have croaked long ago, instead of being all over the TV insulting the President. His snarling face is sickening.

AllyCat

(16,177 posts)
40. Proud to have voted for Pocan every time his name
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 08:14 AM
Jun 2014

appeared on the ballot. Thank Rep. Pocan for telling it like it is.

QuestForSense

(653 posts)
45. I commend him, but where are the other Dems?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 10:26 AM
Jun 2014

So far, he's a chorus of one. Who's going to remember this the day after tomorrow?

 

HenryWallace

(332 posts)
46. I'm not an attorney but, .......
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 10:27 AM
Jun 2014

Won't members of Congress have to sign on to this individually (and not in their capacity as elected officials)?

Are there not penalties for filing frivolous law suits?

Could a counter-suit be filed to recover legal costs?

If these individuals will not stand behind their own actions in regard to this "civil" suit, they need to be called out as the cowards they are!

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
53. "...the Speaker would sue the President for doing his job"
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jun 2014

Yeah, just like Clinton insisted on using Presidential powers as a Democrat, Obama has taken it to the next level of outrage for the RW loony-tunes, and keeps insisting on being President, not only as a Democrat, but while Black(!), and you know, doing stuff. For the people.

This scene always comes to mind when I picture Boehner running meetings. Just substitute a bottle of scotch for the secretary. Can I get an "Harumph"?!



treestar

(82,383 posts)
56. My nephew's great grandfathers were born in the US
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jun 2014

And he was fascinated by the games and cheered on the USA

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrat Laughs in Do-Not...