Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babsbunny

(8,441 posts)
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 08:19 PM Jun 2014

Judge upholds order demanding release of CIA torture accounts

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/26/judge-upholds-order-release-cia-torture-accounts

US government loses attempt to keep accounts of torture of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri secret

Spencer Ackerman in New York

A military judge has rejected the US government's attempts to keep accounts of the CIA's torture of a detainee secret, setting up a fateful choice for the Obama administration in staunching the fallout from its predecessor's brutal interrogations.

In a currently-sealed 24 June ruling at Guantánamo Bay – described to the Guardian – Judge James Pohl upheld his April order demanding the government produce details of the detentions and interrogations of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri during his years in CIA custody. The Miami Herald also reported on the ruling, citing three sources who had seen it.

Among those details are the locations of the "black site" secret prisons in which Nashiri was held until his September 2006 transfer to Guantánamo; the names and communications of CIA personnel there; training and other procedures for guards and interrogators; and discussions of the application of so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques".
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge upholds order demanding release of CIA torture accounts (Original Post) babsbunny Jun 2014 OP
I always thought what happens in the CIA, stays in the CIA. nt valerief Jun 2014 #1
This could be embarrassing .. elias49 Jun 2014 #2
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #3
 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
2. This could be embarrassing ..
Wed Jun 25, 2014, 08:24 PM
Jun 2014

Let's see what actually gets 'revealed' without redaction. That is, unless there is some further appeal process that might grind this further to unrecognizable dust.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge upholds order deman...