General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING NEWS: SCOTUS Restores Buffer Zone!
The Age of Harassing Innocent Justices is Finally Over!
[IMG][/IMG]
randys1
(16,286 posts)five asshole rightwingers on the SC hate women and they know this will piss off the liberals, i.e. those folks they hate because they know we are better than they are.
amazing
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)So maybe they distance was the concern, we know absolutely that the 4 scumbags would be against anything that restricts zealot morons from attacking women, we know that
IronGate
(2,186 posts)As in, 9-0.
Maybe reading the decision before posting would save you some embarrassment.
randys1
(16,286 posts)maybe 35 feet was too much, i dont know
alito, roberts, thomas and scalia are still horrible human beings
IronGate
(2,186 posts)Won't get no argument from me on that.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)That tells you that Kennedy has fully embraced the dark side since O'Conner left
Interesting times. Surprisingly Roberts did uphold the 8 feet restriction, which really isn't enough space between crazies
randys1
(16,286 posts)You mean in this ruling they upheld 8 feet?
I thought they ruled only on 35
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)IronGate
(2,186 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)The terrorists want to be able to physically impede the Women, they want to be so close to the Women that the Women will feel concern for their safety.
The mindfuck this does to Women, well, what can I say...if you are a rightwinger you hate Women
IronGate
(2,186 posts)The way I'm reading it, and I'm not a lawyer, but I did spend a night at a Holiday Inn Express, the buffer can now be anywhere between 8' to 34'.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)Qualify you for just about everything?
IronGate
(2,186 posts)The sad thing is that there's more truth to your statement than most people realize.
former9thward
(31,949 posts)If you are a abortion provider do you want to spend hundreds of thousands in legal costs when a buffer of any greater distance is challenged? You know that 8' will be ok.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)abakan
(1,815 posts)but not for women who need medical care?? Double standard much, SCOTUS?
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)Have conversations about their dicks and uteruses?
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)It has nothing to do with having civil conversations with pregnant women. I've been on that line before to help counter the antichoice nutjobs. They scream vile messages at them.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)Rider3
(919 posts)But screw the woman who needs to go into Planned Parenthood for a pap. Fuck them.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)aggiesal
(8,907 posts)but we supreme court justices need them.
Hypocrisy at its finest.
bluesbassman
(19,361 posts)Shame on the SC for allowing it.
raven mad
(4,940 posts)We have ONE PP clinic locally, and they've been fighting to stay open for 20 years. When my stepdaughter thought she was pregnant, she couldn't get a test anywhere else for free - not even from the state - so we decided to head there.
I don't think as many RW heads have exploded quite as loudly recently......... my Jeep made short work of THAT "protest line" - that was in the drive to the clinic, and blocking the front door. All to a bunch of loud rock music, courtesy of moi...........
She was pregnant. I have a wonderful grandson - thank you Planned Parenthood!