Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
131 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So a message here in GD was hidden because of a spoiler (Original Post) KamaAina Jun 2014 OP
when a spoiler isn't a spoiler because the spoils are spoiled snooper2 Jun 2014 #1
If you are trying to avoid the World Cup scores, you shouldn't be online NightWatcher Jun 2014 #2
A person can be online piecemeal, a few minutes at a time tkmorris Jun 2014 #7
if you don't want to know the score, avoid the places that might report the score NightWatcher Jun 2014 #10
Not hard at all tkmorris Jun 2014 #26
Yes. In fact, posting a spoiler warning is easier kcr Jun 2014 #39
True, but it doesn't excuse posting spoilers. It's still rude kcr Jun 2014 #37
there's lots of rude assholes, if you really are trying to avoid something, try harder NightWatcher Jun 2014 #40
Or insist that people post spoiler warnings and they can't participate if they don't kcr Jun 2014 #41
staying off the internet or sites where it might be spoiled takes zero seconds NightWatcher Jun 2014 #43
Right. And if someone encounters rudeness in RL, it's their fault for not being a recluse kcr Jun 2014 #47
Do me a favor and avoid every news service on Tuesday nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #58
Sometimes news sources offer warnings for spoil-worthy events, particularly online kcr Jun 2014 #60
The so called spoiler alert by NBC was put in place by the IOC SPOILER ALERT nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #61
Am I one of your stalkers then because I think posting spoilers is rude? kcr Jun 2014 #62
I did not say that nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #70
I love you, nadin, and would not have voted to hide your post. But ... 11 Bravo Jun 2014 #73
Yes we fully disagree on this nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #78
I won't argue about shitty alerts in general. I think there are a lot of people on DU who pull that kcr Jun 2014 #88
Then somebody better tell the News Media to stop doing that nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #91
How is the source of your info that you're spoiling for others relevant? kcr Jun 2014 #93
I am sorry, but given we have been posting here as goals happen well before this world cup nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #98
Yes, and often those discussions happen in threads with spoiler warnings kcr Jun 2014 #100
No, no they don't nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #102
No one ever gives spoiler warnings when they start a thread? kcr Jun 2014 #104
It is not a constant as you wish to make it nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #106
That's the point. Some don't, and it's rude behavior when it's deliberate kcr Jun 2014 #108
Don;t worry, will not spoil a wild fire for you nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #109
Yeah, not the same. kcr Jun 2014 #110
Here, they are nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #117
It was rude Nadin tkmorris Jun 2014 #64
Yes, it's rude for life and time to march on without stopping to consider your feelings. nt TeamPooka Jun 2014 #86
I don't see too many advocating for indefinite spoiler warnings on everything. kcr Jun 2014 #89
And an event that was breaking news on multiple news services nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #92
Like I said in another post, how is that relevant? kcr Jun 2014 #95
Stay away from twitter Facebook yahoo news nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #99
Yes, that's a smart thing to do kcr Jun 2014 #103
If anybody wannts to avoid it STAY OFF ANY SOCIAL MEDIA nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #107
Doesn't change the fact it's rude and inconsiderate kcr Jun 2014 #112
It is not rude to share breaking news after the major services break them. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #113
It is if it's a spoiler for an event that is ruined if the outcome is known. kcr Jun 2014 #114
Go complaint to AP, Reuters, BBC and MSNBC nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #116
No, I'll point out that deliberately disseminating that info knowing that it spoils it is rude. kcr Jun 2014 #118
You got what you wanted nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #120
Well, that's up to you, of course. kcr Jun 2014 #121
I would say a classic case of bias CBGLuthier Jun 2014 #3
She got zapped! morningfog Jun 2014 #8
Huh?? She was tombstoned! madinmaryland Jun 2014 #18
No. The post was just hidden by a jury. MineralMan Jun 2014 #21
No, the poster is assuming that the alert was sent by zappaman...nt SidDithers Jun 2014 #22
Nope. zappaman Jun 2014 #24
Nip nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #25
That was a bs hide nadin. neverforget Jun 2014 #30
I am nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #31
It should have been hidden tkmorris Jun 2014 #4
LOL, it is a fucking soccer game! WTF? nt Logical Jun 2014 #126
I don't read LBN for that reason if I don't want to know the outcome of a world cup match. zappaman Jun 2014 #5
Meanwhile on my Yahoo page the result is posted front and center. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2014 #6
Actually, it turns out that the whole thing is a dream that Hodor is having petronius Jun 2014 #14
LOL. Tommy_Carcetti Jun 2014 #16
Did you alert on it? MineralMan Jun 2014 #9
Um, no. KamaAina Jun 2014 #33
Well, see, someone did alert on the one in GD. MineralMan Jun 2014 #34
Where do I go to see Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #79
You only know if they tell you. tammywammy Jun 2014 #81
I know, she told me that months ago. cwydro Jun 2014 #130
You can't. Some folks, though, will be happy to MineralMan Jun 2014 #124
LBN requires faithful use of source headline, so spoilers there are unavoidable pinboy3niner Jun 2014 #11
Darn you! I haven't checked my inbox for the jury results yet, and now you've petronius Jun 2014 #12
Skinner has weighed in on "spoilers"... bluesbassman Jun 2014 #20
Instead if breaking news I will now use nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #32
Your choice, seems a little silly though. bluesbassman Jun 2014 #49
I am sorry, but I think it was silly nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #55
There is a vast difference between a news event and a sporting event tkmorris Jun 2014 #69
Good hide... SidDithers Jun 2014 #13
What did spoil? It was news. There isn't a broadcast delay. morningfog Jun 2014 #82
In the meantime, my local radio news station announced the MineralMan Jun 2014 #15
It wasn't even delayed-broadcast; it aired in real time, unlike the Olympics. alarimer Jun 2014 #66
I have trouble understanding the spoiler thing panader0 Jun 2014 #17
I might start doing that for nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #28
How, exactly, would a "tornado" spoiler work? Brickbat Jun 2014 #36
Literal-LOL! "Spoiler Alert! Don't click if you don't want to know about the petronius Jun 2014 #45
Hey, I'm laughing too. panader0 Jun 2014 #54
When I see the vehemence of some of these replies, I picture: petronius Jun 2014 #59
While it's hard to enforce, I've often seen more respect for hiding spoilers in GD, and people who Brickbat Jun 2014 #19
You made the huge mistake Warpy Jun 2014 #23
Another one not hidden. Sure looks like a personal thing again hobbit709 Jun 2014 #27
That one has "spoiler alert" in the title, so people who don't want to know won't open it. Brickbat Jun 2014 #29
I received an alert on my phone from our local news site. herding cats Jun 2014 #35
People who don't want live events "spoiled" should get the fuck off the internet, full stop Spider Jerusalem Jun 2014 #38
Spoiled Alert: People who want the entire world to not mention something NightWatcher Jun 2014 #42
There were a ton of fireworks going off around here, eleven-ish... countryjake Jun 2014 #44
What, you couldn't demand that your neighbors not fire off spoiler fireworks? pinboy3niner Jun 2014 #48
There's a certain snobbery against those who are highly excited... countryjake Jun 2014 #63
And in a certain region of the country nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #71
Oh yeah, the risk of fire even up here in wa is too real. countryjake Jun 2014 #111
I learned the joys watching it with my dad (spoiler alert, we are talking socccer) nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #115
Just came back on to see you've now been "flagged for review". countryjake Jun 2014 #128
I knew nothing about soccer until my son got onto a little kids' team pinboy3niner Jun 2014 #77
How neat that you did that! countryjake Jun 2014 #122
Spoilers are first world problems. MineralMan Jun 2014 #46
It was the poster, not what was posted. SixString Jun 2014 #50
I gather as much now. KamaAina Jun 2014 #51
I think you are right BainsBane Jun 2014 #96
+1,000 n/t malaise Jun 2014 #97
no such thing as a spoiler for real life events, sorry geek tragedy Jun 2014 #52
Rosebud was his sled. Dr. Strange Jun 2014 #53
And Bruce Willis was really dead...(nt) Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #57
Verbal Kint was Keyser Soze opiate69 Jun 2014 #65
Shane dies at the end petronius Jun 2014 #75
John Cusak, Ray Liotta, Amanda Peet, et. al were Malcolm Rivers' dissociated personalities... opiate69 Jun 2014 #83
you makes your post and takes your chances. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #56
An abuse of the system, IMHO, and pointless as well... joeybee12 Jun 2014 #67
Stupid-ass bullshit "jury" system. n/t tabasco Jun 2014 #68
once again, entertainment trumps information.... mike_c Jun 2014 #72
To me it is the principle of hiding shit just for hiding nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #80
And I told you this would sink nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #123
yup mike_c Jun 2014 #127
Of all the threads I've posted over the years, this has become the most successful. KamaAina Jun 2014 #74
It's amazing what gets people worked up on this board. neverforget Jun 2014 #94
At this point I see this as part of a pattern nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #101
Meh, One fuck I do not give about some soccer match Champion Jack Jun 2014 #76
People who are actually following the World Cup all know the result malaise Jun 2014 #84
That is why from now on I will stay wiht my homeys on FB nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #85
Check this out malaise Jun 2014 #87
Somebody did have to tell the POTUS nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #90
Your "homeys"? cwydro Jun 2014 #131
People complaining about a spoiler need to get a life. dilby Jun 2014 #105
I agree. nt laundry_queen Jun 2014 #125
That's just idiotic itsrobert Jun 2014 #119
Life doesn't come with Trigger warnings, Spoiler alerts or NSFW badges. GoneOffShore Jun 2014 #129

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
2. If you are trying to avoid the World Cup scores, you shouldn't be online
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jun 2014

Twitter, Facebook, Huffpo, CNN...every website reported the score.

If you were online in DU, you could've easily been streaming the game and you would've known too.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
7. A person can be online piecemeal, a few minutes at a time
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jun 2014

Streaming a live game is not really feasible that way.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
10. if you don't want to know the score, avoid the places that might report the score
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:07 PM
Jun 2014

DU is one of those places, along with everywhere else online.

I DVR sports quite often, and when I do, I don't go online, I avoid twitter, I don't listen to or watch the radio, and I stay away from places that would ruin it for me.

When most of the world is watching the World Cup and YOU want to watch it later and not have it spoiled for YOU, YOU need to take the extra effort to avoid having it spoiled. If YOU know some asshole on DU is going to spoil it for YOU, avoid DU. How hard is that to grasp?

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
26. Not hard at all
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jun 2014

On the other hand, if a person wants to discuss an event that someone else may be DVRing, the rule is "Don't be an asshole and post a spoiler in the thread title".

How hard is THAT to grasp?

kcr

(15,315 posts)
39. Yes. In fact, posting a spoiler warning is easier
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:42 PM
Jun 2014

If rude people would stop being rude, there would be no problem and no need to avoid the internet. Rudeness isn't excused just because it's possible to avoid the rude behavior.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
37. True, but it doesn't excuse posting spoilers. It's still rude
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:37 PM
Jun 2014

Some people can't avoid going online, or they forget. I've done that, and then when I saw the spoiler I remembered I didn't want to go there.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
40. there's lots of rude assholes, if you really are trying to avoid something, try harder
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:43 PM
Jun 2014

Like Skinner said, it's common courtesy and common sense. DU'ers aren't always courteous, so exercise common sense and avoid places where some asshole might spoil it.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
41. Or insist that people post spoiler warnings and they can't participate if they don't
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:44 PM
Jun 2014

There's no reason to tolerate rude behavior. Posting a spoiler warning takes two seconds.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
43. staying off the internet or sites where it might be spoiled takes zero seconds
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:48 PM
Jun 2014

Stop expecting the entire world to stop for you. Spoiled Alert.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
47. Right. And if someone encounters rudeness in RL, it's their fault for not being a recluse
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jun 2014

Rude behavior should be free and unencumbered from criticism. That makes the same amount of sense.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
58. Do me a favor and avoid every news service on Tuesday
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:08 PM
Jun 2014

or they will "spoil it" for you. Damn rude people!

Oh and that includes the internet.

But don't worry, from now on instead of breaking news for actual breaking news, DU will get the Spoiler Alert...

kcr

(15,315 posts)
60. Sometimes news sources offer warnings for spoil-worthy events, particularly online
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:14 PM
Jun 2014

Or they'll warn they're about to give the results. Particularly for events like the Olympics that are delayed, so people can't watch them live. But the fact that an event was covered on the news doesn't excuse being rude.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
61. The so called spoiler alert by NBC was put in place by the IOC SPOILER ALERT
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:24 PM
Jun 2014

FIFA, since we are in the same continent, does not have such a constraint on ESPN, or any other news service anywhere in the world in fact.

They will repeat the game by the way.

Don't worry, as far as how the US does, I am done posting here, never mind many of us have been watching and POSTING goals as they happen throughout the cup. This was a BULLSHIT HIDE. And from now on, so more serious people can avoid the fainting couch, they will get spoilers for school shootings, SCOTUS decisions, wildfires, I mean it is not like I want to ruin your watching of it later.

And as far as the US is concerned SPOILER ALERT, SPOILER ALERT, SPOILER ALERT, make sure you do not read beyond this point... do so at your own risk... they are playing Belgium on Tuesday and if they play like today, they are going home. SPOILER ALERT, SPOILER ALERT, SPOILER ALERT.

And do avoid news alerts, news apps, twitter, faceboook, redditt, or any where else where SPOILER ALERT, this might be discussed.

And this was directed at me by a small group of stalkers, ok. I assume everything I post is alerted on... so like little kids...

For the record, I have in the background a non game right now. It really does not matter who is playing. It really does not.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
62. Am I one of your stalkers then because I think posting spoilers is rude?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jun 2014

This has been a point of contention on DU on more than one occasion.

I had no idea the IOC was so powerful that they could force the news to alert spoiling. What happened to the news orginizations who spoiled the outcome? That includes NBC affiliates. It makes no sense for them to spoil their own content. But they certainly didn't seem to worry about the IOC.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
70. I did not say that
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:38 PM
Jun 2014

but the truth is, look the OP and some of the exchanges. Some of the shitty alerts directed at me, are just that, shitty. They got lucky with this one. But they alert, constantly. The system is broken. I also get constantly attacked by the same crowd, it is a small crowd, and they get away with murder... constantly.

Now if you do not mind, spoiler alert, I got an article to finish on inequality. Which will be posted here with the proper warnings, such as trigger alert, is critical of economic policy and spoiler alert, deals with economic policy. Every where else... it will run with proper title.

And don't worry about me spoiling your sports... there is a game now, but who the fuck cares? I might spoil it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
78. Yes we fully disagree on this
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jun 2014

I think the spoiler alert is a stupid idea when every news app on my IPAD is going off, and news services are breaking news.

During the Olympics, they did not do that. MSNBC said, SPOILER ALERT before giving away results. IT was part of their contract by the way with the IOC. With the World Cup there is no such rule.

So yes we disagree, but I will no longer post anything that has to do with the sport HERE or this world cup. I will continue to post it where adults actually engage in adult discussions. This is petty and what 12 year olds do.

So yes, we disagree.

This is to the same level as the RP hide the other day (Funny, now I recommend each one of them, even before reading them on principle)

This place is petty and it is showing it.

And from now on, I will treat this place like the Kinder garden it is becoming. It is not junior HS anymore. And yes, I am pissed.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
88. I won't argue about shitty alerts in general. I think there are a lot of people on DU who pull that
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:21 PM
Jun 2014

But unless you know who alerted I'm not sure you can know that in this instance because plenty of people get pretty steamed at spoilers and always have.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
91. Then somebody better tell the News Media to stop doing that
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:27 PM
Jun 2014

or the President of the United States.

Damn him, he opened his address in Minneapolis with the result! DAMN HIM *&^&(^

And this is now comedy goal.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
93. How is the source of your info that you're spoiling for others relevant?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:30 PM
Jun 2014

If you know that people will be upset because an event will be spoiled for them if you post the info, then you shouldn't post it without a warning. It's inconsiderate. It doesn't matter if they could possibly be spoiled elsewhere or by someone else.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
98. I am sorry, but given we have been posting here as goals happen well before this world cup
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:40 PM
Jun 2014

and discussing games as they happen, silly me thinking that SOME PEOPLE would get so upset. As I said, I will now restraint my discussions of the beautiful game to Facebook, were adults are. I will also restraint them to my paper where we will continue to follow the plight of two teams that are of special interests to my readers. DU, not so much. As far as I am concerned the game next Tuesday is not happening anywhere where I can share it with people here.

And yes, some of us have enjoyed the GGGGGGGGOOOOOOAAAAALLLLLL as actual games are happening right here on GD, Now I will keep to FB. I advise you to stay away from my FB profile while a game is in progress. Or for that matter away from Reporting San Diego, since I might live blog next week. So let that serve as your spoiler alert.

Hell, I might just stick to Twitter for all I care. DU, not so much. This is infantile.

One of my fondest memories was the final four years ago, with my DU homies, we were all stuck to the GD... but not to hurt sensibilities I will now stick to where adults wander and do not care about sharing the experience. And please, do stay away from Twitter and news media let it spoil it for you.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
100. Yes, and often those discussions happen in threads with spoiler warnings
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jun 2014

With a dedicated spoiler warned thread for discussion of the event.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
102. No, no they don't
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:42 PM
Jun 2014

but don't worry, your sensitivities will not be hurt, it is the twitter for me. It is FB, it is reddit, where adults actually are adults.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
104. No one ever gives spoiler warnings when they start a thread?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:45 PM
Jun 2014

That's news to me. I see DUers do it all the time.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
106. It is not a constant as you wish to make it
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:50 PM
Jun 2014

don't worry, will start giving them for everything, not just sports anymore.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
108. That's the point. Some don't, and it's rude behavior when it's deliberate
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:52 PM
Jun 2014

I think sometimes people don't realize or get caught up in the moment. They'll usually apologize and delete or edit when someone points out they're spoiling something.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
109. Don;t worry, will not spoil a wild fire for you
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:53 PM
Jun 2014

if one breaks, while everywhere else it is referred as Breaking news, here I will only use SPOILER ALERT.

If there is a shooting... while everywhere else it is referred as BREAKING NEWS, here it will be a SPOILER ALERT

That is what the kids want, that is what they get.

As to sports, as I said, my football will be shared where adults gather.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
89. I don't see too many advocating for indefinite spoiler warnings on everything.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:24 PM
Jun 2014

This was an event that had just ended. So it's not an unreasonable request, and deliberately ignoring it knowing it will ruin something for a lot of people is rude and inconsiderate, especially when it costs so little in time and effort.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
92. And an event that was breaking news on multiple news services
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:28 PM
Jun 2014

all around the world!!!!

There were no broadcast delays either. The olympics, it made sense... there WERE broadcast delays.

If you do not want to know what the results are, get off the net now

Another game right now... don't worry, it is not happening.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
95. Like I said in another post, how is that relevant?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:31 PM
Jun 2014

If the person otherwise didn't know until they read your post, you spoiled it for them.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
103. Yes, that's a smart thing to do
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:44 PM
Jun 2014

So someone manages to avoid all that info only to get spoiled at DU. If DU charged by the character it would be one thing. But they don't. Disregarding the fact that some people are trying to avoid that information when it's just about the most effortless way to be nice isn't rational or justifiable.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
112. Doesn't change the fact it's rude and inconsiderate
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:59 PM
Jun 2014

How nice that many people won't be on DU until they watch it, because some people don't want to be bothered.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
113. It is not rude to share breaking news after the major services break them.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jun 2014

don't worry, people who get this hung up over SPORTS, have issues. And that is a fact jack.

Now feel free to believe whatever you want.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
114. It is if it's a spoiler for an event that is ruined if the outcome is known.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:02 PM
Jun 2014

All news isn't the same.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
116. Go complaint to AP, Reuters, BBC and MSNBC
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:04 PM
Jun 2014

all four had push notifications the moment the whistle blew.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
118. No, I'll point out that deliberately disseminating that info knowing that it spoils it is rude.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:06 PM
Jun 2014

Pointing out that the news reports it doesn't absolve the behavior. IF someone face to face tells you "Stop! I haven't seen x yet!" DO you just keep charging on with the info because hey! It was on the news so it's okay! I really hope not.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
120. You got what you wanted
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:10 PM
Jun 2014

I will not share anything of what has happened here... if people are this fixated over a sport, so be it. But from now on will give spoiler alerts for what is breaking news. That is what you are telling me. That breaking news is a spoiler alert, so will treat breaking news as a spoiler alert from now on. It is what it is.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
121. Well, that's up to you, of course.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:21 PM
Jun 2014

I don't think it's that hard to discern between what's a spoiler and what isn't, so I don't think it's necessary. But, your decision.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
3. I would say a classic case of bias
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:01 PM
Jun 2014

You don't have to be around DU very long to know there is an anti-nadin clique.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
31. I am
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:26 PM
Jun 2014

Working on an article on inequality.

I know I will post it in social media. Since I am taking direct aim at the NEBR am afraid it will be alerted here. I am seriously debating posting here, or just having a spoiler alert on the "attack" on the administration.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
4. It should have been hidden
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:01 PM
Jun 2014

Posting spoilers is just internet asshattery, everyone knows better but some just can't seem to resist.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
5. I don't read LBN for that reason if I don't want to know the outcome of a world cup match.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:02 PM
Jun 2014

Or the Olympics for that matter.
OP did not need to post a spoiler in the header of GD.
There were many ways they could have posted the information without revealing it in the header.
For example...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025154427

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,171 posts)
6. Meanwhile on my Yahoo page the result is posted front and center.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:02 PM
Jun 2014

I guess if I were more into the World Cup and if the game itself wasn't playing in the lobby at my office, I might be pissed. Right now, though for me personally, meh.

Now people who have read all of George R.R. Martin's Fire and Ice book series and post spoilers as to what is going to happen on the Game of Thrones TV series.....those people will die a horrible death for me.

I now know that Hodor will be declared the one true rightful heir to the Iron Throne. Thanks a lot, assholes.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
14. Actually, it turns out that the whole thing is a dream that Hodor is having
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jun 2014

At the end, he wakes up in bed and says ...

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
9. Did you alert on it?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:07 PM
Jun 2014

Someone alerted on the first example, and a jury hid it. Try an alert on the other one and see what happens. There are no guarantees, though, that another jury will vote the same way.

Note: I neither alerted nor was on the jury for the first link. If called, I would have recused myself anyhow.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
34. Well, see, someone did alert on the one in GD.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:34 PM
Jun 2014

It went to a jury, which voted to hide it. That's how the system works. Now, I wouldn't have voted to hide it, because I don't care even a little bit about spoilers for sports events. I actually would have recused myself, though, since the poster has me on ignore, and I do not vote in juries for people who have me on ignore.

But, I asked if you had alerted because that's what happened in the GD thread.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
11. LBN requires faithful use of source headline, so spoilers there are unavoidable
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:07 PM
Jun 2014
IF someone chooses to post the item there...

petronius

(26,602 posts)
12. Darn you! I haven't checked my inbox for the jury results yet, and now you've
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jun 2014

spoiled it for me!!1!

My opinion is that, even for a live sporting event, a spoiler warning is a valued courtesy - and it costs nothing whatsoever to add one. We all know people who DVR events or have done so ourselves, and while the onus of news-avoidance is certainly on the DVRer, it's easy enough to try and help them out.

That said, I think it's over the top to hide a thread for the absence of a spoiler warning, absent any direct guidance from the owners or a clear community consensus around a particular event...


(Note: my intro was a joke, I haven't really been on any juries.)

bluesbassman

(19,369 posts)
20. Skinner has weighed in on "spoilers"...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jun 2014
I think both sides have some responsibility here.

Posting spoilers in thread titles isn't cool. If you want to be considerate of others, don't post them in our thread titles. And if you want to be super considerate, you should put a spoiler warning in your thread title.

HAVING SAID THAT, If you are someone who wants to avoid seeing spoilers, you should not be hanging out on a public message board or other social media. Because chances are that someone is going to post a spoiler, and you are going to see it.

It's just common courtesy and common sense.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021036732#post10


So, while this isn't a direct prohibition of spoilers, it is an urging for common courtesy and common sense.

bluesbassman

(19,369 posts)
49. Your choice, seems a little silly though.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:54 PM
Jun 2014

I enjoy reading your posts Nadin, and feel they are informative and a positive contribution to the community.

I think the hide was valid though as "spoilers" as they relate to sporting events are something that the DU community has for a long time voiced the opinion that they are not appreciated as thread titles. It falls into the same category (to me at least) as including a "NSFW" or "trigger warning" caution in a thread title for content that may be problematic for certain environments or individuals. It's just common courtesy.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
55. I am sorry, but I think it was silly
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:04 PM
Jun 2014

and as usual part of the harassment pattern by a really small but loud group of people.

I do not alert anymore
, I have a group of very loyal stalkers who enjoy to engage in personal attacks that are beyond the pale. But something that is pretty much all over Yahoo news, AP, Reuters, BBC, RT. MSNBC, CNN, I could go on, the list includes every news service in the world, is really stupid shit.

So from now on. I will have to give spoiler alerts for school shootings, SCOTUS decisions, Tornadoes, and other things.

So you know, by the time I finished writing that, and posted it, at least five of my news apps and twitter went overdrive.

Moreover, the rule applied during the olympics, not now. But hell, whatever, and Tuesday, when spiler alert the US plays Belgium, I will stay away from posting anything here. I might live blog it though.

Some of this is rather personal.

So from now on... spoiler alerts everywhere, and definitely by tonight if I finish that copy by tonight. It is guaranteed to get at least one alert. Yes, I now assume EVERYTHING I post is alerted on DU by that merry band. They will not stop until I either get banned or I die. Yup, that simple, because I am not going anywhere.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
69. There is a vast difference between a news event and a sporting event
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:38 PM
Jun 2014

If you are unable or unwilling to see that it is a waste of fucking time talking to you or anyone else taking up that ridiculous position.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
15. In the meantime, my local radio news station announced the
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:12 PM
Jun 2014

results as soon as they were available. People who insist on not knowing the results of delayed-broadcast sporting events really have to take extraordinary measures, I think. If they don't, there will always be a spoiler.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
66. It wasn't even delayed-broadcast; it aired in real time, unlike the Olympics.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jun 2014

NPR reports the results in real time, as does every other news outlet.

If you don't want to be spoiled, stay off the damn internet and don't listen to the radio or TV.

It is up to the person who wants to avoid spoilers to take care of it themselves. It is no one else's responsibility, especially for a non-tape-delayed sporting event.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
17. I have trouble understanding the spoiler thing
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:12 PM
Jun 2014

I get it that some people are at work or may be taping the show for later, but why is it only for sports?
Why not make SCOTUS decisions spoilers too? Or tornadoes? Pick any post on DU and put "Spoiler Alert" in the title so people who don't want to learn about it until later would be safe. The game is news, period. So are Supreme Court decisions.
Why are only sports post in need of spoiler alerts? Silly. Now let's talk about NSFW issues!

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
36. How, exactly, would a "tornado" spoiler work?
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:37 PM
Jun 2014

The point of sports is that it's fun to watch, and the fun can be spoiled by knowing the outcome. The game is news, sure, but it's also fun, and some of the fun comes from not knowing the outcome.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
54. Hey, I'm laughing too.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:04 PM
Jun 2014

If you don't want to know about a World Cup score, best to stay off the nets and the TV. Don't talk to your co-workers either.
In fact, the NSFW thing would apply here too, no? LOL
Much ado about nothing

petronius

(26,602 posts)
59. When I see the vehemence of some of these replies, I picture:
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:12 PM
Jun 2014


(But I agree, it's not worth getting worked up either way, and I wouldn't hide a post for it.)

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
19. While it's hard to enforce, I've often seen more respect for hiding spoilers in GD, and people who
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:14 PM
Jun 2014

are watching games later go to GD first to avoid LBN headlines. It's hard to protect yourself from spoilers, but it can be done, and it's a nice gesture when other people respect it.

Warpy

(111,237 posts)
23. You made the huge mistake
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:17 PM
Jun 2014

of suggesting the US team aren't the best players on the planet.

For shame.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
29. That one has "spoiler alert" in the title, so people who don't want to know won't open it.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:22 PM
Jun 2014

The hidden one had the result in the title, so anyone scrolling through GD would see it.

herding cats

(19,559 posts)
35. I received an alert on my phone from our local news site.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:36 PM
Jun 2014

Damn them for not using a spoiler headline!

Considering how big a deal this is to the US soccer fans, the story is already everyplace on the net I've been since the news broke. Literally everyplace.

Seems a silly thing to take umbrage to, let alone something hide worthy.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
42. Spoiled Alert: People who want the entire world to not mention something
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:46 PM
Jun 2014

because they want to watch it later...

You're 100% correct. If it's important enough for you to want to avoid hearing about it, stay the fuck off the net.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
44. There were a ton of fireworks going off around here, eleven-ish...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:48 PM
Jun 2014

so I knew right away that the USA had most likely advanced.

Fireworks at 11 in the morning on the day that we are competing in a World Cup game should undoubtedly come with a "spoiler" warning.

That hidden thread surely must have come with a on the alerter's part.

It is a bullshit hide.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
63. There's a certain snobbery against those who are highly excited...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jun 2014

and actually understand the game of futbol, here in my county.

I wouldn't dream of joining the ranks of the elite uninformed to look down my nose at those who love soccer, nor would I ever try to squelch their enthusiasm over these World Cup events.

I remember back when my daughter first began playing soccer and I was so uncomfortably ignorant of how the game was played. It took me awhile, but I did eventually learn to love futbol, just like most of the rest of the world.

I only wish that it would rain, since fire-works always scare me, this time of year. Not looking forward to this next week, at all.



 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
71. And in a certain region of the country
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jun 2014

that could lead to a nice wild fire.

I get excited over it, but not for the success of the American team, or El Tri... just good ol' fashioned world class soccer.

We decided, since some folks do care about those two specific teams where I live, to actually cover them in a tad more detail.

But will not make the mistake of posting anything that has to do with the beautiful game here... it might spoil it for some. In fact, have a game in the background right now. SPOILER ALERT, both teams are out. So it is essentially an exhibition game. I just enjoy good soccer.

Though the officiating this world cup... ay caramba!!! Now need to print the article...

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
111. Oh yeah, the risk of fire even up here in wa is too real.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jun 2014

We've got a pasture that has burned in the past due to wayward rockets, and this year it's only half-mown (tractor is broken down) so I've been a nervous-nellie ever since the fireworks went on sale. If our woods lit, it would be disastrous, so I'm doing rain dances all week, ha.

Like pinboy, I learned the joys and beauty of soccer when my daughter was a little kid and she taught me how the game is played. Been a fan ever since, and always love to watch a really good match. One year, my girl sent my man a bunch of Sounders gear for his Xmas gift, since they've had an ongoing dispute over what is real football for years. He was insulted but did finally begin wearing some of it...the scarf was especially fine, so he caved. Nowadays, both of us enjoy the sport.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
115. I learned the joys watching it with my dad (spoiler alert, we are talking socccer)
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:03 PM
Jun 2014

my brother was a Club America man, and if the term existed then, superfan. he would qualify. So Sundays could get a little hot, if the America lost, and there were bad calls. The game between Mexico and Cameroon would have been epic in that regard.

I enjoy a good game, but really do not get that much into who's on top and bottom. Though the Tri and Team USA have been pleasant surprises, but today's game... was beyond flat.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
77. I knew nothing about soccer until my son got onto a little kids' team
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jun 2014

So I signed up to be the assistant coach and began studying the sport.

That was a fun time--and expecially fun to see the kids progress from their helter-skelter field antics to more disciplined play as they grew and learned. And what a learning experience for me!

I'm not looking forward to the fireworks either. My war reactions have mostly subsided, but there's still a vestige of that that makes it uncomfortable.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
122. How neat that you did that!
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:31 PM
Jun 2014

The second soccer team my girl was on had a coach who should have studied, ha! Us moms kept a book right on the sidelines during games and often had to consult it after certain calls, but managed to get a good grasp of the rules from one exceptionally experienced ref who hailed from Mexico. But yes, it was a real fun time for me, too, and an invaluable experience for our kids to learn the meaning of "team play".

I'll never understand the thrill of bombs bursting in air, pinboy. Never have liked them, never will.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
46. Spoilers are first world problems.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jun 2014

Really.

It doesn't matter, really, if you discover something like that. You'll watch the game anyhow. It's the play that's interesting, not the final score. And if the play isn't interesting, you wouldn't watch in the first place.

BainsBane

(53,029 posts)
96. I think you are right
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:35 PM
Jun 2014

I was alerted on for a spoiler too, but mine wasn't in the subject line. The title was "I Believe," which is the chant of Team USA. Anyone watching the cup knows that. Fortunately the alert on me came back 0-7. After all this carrying on about censorship, THAT is what gets hidden.

I had a game spoiled by a subject line here early in the cup. I was disappointed, but it didn't occur to me to alert. After that I either watched live or didn't go on the internet until I had seen the game.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
52. no such thing as a spoiler for real life events, sorry
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:58 PM
Jun 2014

for a film or something else that's fictional, sure, but something that is news is not a spoiler.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
67. An abuse of the system, IMHO, and pointless as well...
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jun 2014

Much better to simply PM the OP and ask for an edit...besides, whenever I see a thread has been hidden by jury decision...I'm like moth to a flame...I click on it to view the original post!

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
72. once again, entertainment trumps information....
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:52 PM
Jun 2014

Sheesh. It's a bunch of grown men kicking a ball around, for cryin' out loud. Massively overpaid ball kickers, at that.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
80. To me it is the principle of hiding shit just for hiding
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jun 2014

I expect an alert on a substantial post this afternoon, in the middle of editing. I almost expect a hide.

No matter, it will go where adults also discuss things. I put it in the category of Bull Shit hides like hiding a RP column over the language. (I now KR every one of his columns on principle)

As to entertainment... do not look into how much FIFA is making, and the actual more serious scandals off the pitch. Real SPOILER but the US might actually get it as default in 2024 if all those off the field dramas work out.

On a more serious note, some social scientist think that international competition is a far better option than actual lead flying.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
123. And I told you this would sink
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 06:59 PM
Jun 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025155807

But we both knew it

I like Football as nice distraction. We post on the paper about it, since people are interested, but we are are also doing serious stuff like this. Next on my list... TISA and TTP. I think though I deserve a tad of an afternoon break before I get my teeth into that. And yes, they are related.
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
74. Of all the threads I've posted over the years, this has become the most successful.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 04:54 PM
Jun 2014

As measured by number of replies, anyway.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
101. At this point I see this as part of a pattern
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jun 2014

to try to silence people

I guarantee, the column on inequality will sink like a rock. I expect it to be alerted on, as well.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
85. That is why from now on I will stay wiht my homeys on FB
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:17 PM
Jun 2014

who are not children... or Redditt.

Sad, isn't it?

dilby

(2,273 posts)
105. People complaining about a spoiler need to get a life.
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 05:49 PM
Jun 2014

Sorry but it was on ESPN, streamed live over the internet and all the news sites are full of the results. There is no spoiler when the results are available to everyone. I can understand spoilers to books, movies, TV Shows that have not aired in your timezone. But expecting the world to keep quite till you can watch your DVR is just plain stupid.

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
129. Life doesn't come with Trigger warnings, Spoiler alerts or NSFW badges.
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 05:04 PM
Jun 2014

People really need to get over themselves.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So a message here in GD w...