Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFDA grapples with oversight of fecal transplants
WASHINGTON (AP) Imagine a low-cost treatment for a life-threatening infection that could cure up to 90 percent of patients with minimal side effects, often in a few days.
It may sound like a miracle drug, but this cutting-edge treatment is profoundly simple though somewhat icky: take the stool of healthy patients to cure those with hard-to-treat intestinal infections. A small but growing number of physicians have begun using these so-called fecal transplants to treat Clostridium difficile, commonly referred to as C-diff, a bacterial infection that causes nausea, cramping and diarrhea. The germ afflicts a half-million Americans annually and kills about 15,000 of them.
But fecal transplants pose a challenge for the Food and Drug Administration, which has decided to regulate the treatment as an experimental drug. Stool transplants don't fit neatly into the agency's standard framework. And while regulators have shown flexibility in their approach, some critics say the mere presence of government oversight is discouraging many doctors from offering transplants. That's led some patients to seek out questionable "do-it-yourself" websites, forums and videos.
Most researchers agree that the FDA's concerns are warranted. Patients can contract HIV, hepatitis and other viruses and parasites from fecal matter that is not properly screened. Additionally, there are no long-term studies on potential side effects of stool transplantation.
FDA officials declined to be interviewed for this story, but said in a written response that the fecal transplantation "shows promise in treating C. difficile infection that has not been responsive to other therapies."
More at http://www.theeagle.com/news/health_fitness/fda-grapples-with-oversight-of-fecal-transplants/article_54320a25-3646-5ff0-9328-0e79d436d7a3.html .
[font color=green]Yes, that's correct--none of the FDA officials wanted to give a shitty interview.[/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 834 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDA grapples with oversight of fecal transplants (Original Post)
TexasTowelie
Jun 2014
OP
NRaleighLiberal
(60,006 posts)1. nearly fell off my stool when I read that...
TexasTowelie
(111,952 posts)2. ROTFL.
This thread could be very interesting.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,006 posts)3. ...it could also be a real waste!
Tetris_Iguana
(501 posts)4. Lol
This conundrum stinks.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)5. Well poop!
1000words
(7,051 posts)6. What a load. I'm dumping this OP ...
Scat!
dembotoz
(16,785 posts)7. thought this thread had to do with that brat guy replacing cantor