General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTHIS Should Scare Us:
The .01% are negotiating a secret trade agreement that would further weaken financial regulations in participating nations including the US and EU.
The new agreement, called the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), would not just fail to tighten regulations, but would weaken them below 2008 levels.
Earlier this month, Wikileaks published a draft of a portion of the treaty. "In a significant anti-transparency manoeuvre by the parties, the draft has been classified to keep it secret not just during the negotiations but for five years after the TISA enters into force."
Virtually no other news outlet has mentioned the draft, even to dispute its authenticity.
Preliminary analysis of the draft indicates:
The same states shut down moves by other WTO Members to critically debate these rules following the GFC with a view to reform.
They want to expand and deepen the existing regime through TISA, bypassing the stalled Doha round at the WTO and creating a new template for future free trade agreements and ultimately for the WTO.
TISA is designed for and in close consultation with the global finance industry, whose greed and recklessness has been blamed for successive crises and who continue to capture rulemaking in global institutions.
A sample of provisions from this leaked text show that governments signing on to TISA will: be expected to lock in and extend their current levels of financial deregulation and liberalisation; lose the right to require data to be held onshore; face pressure to authorise potentially toxic insurance products; and risk a legal challenge if they adopt measures to prevent or respond to another crisis.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)humans suck!
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)There has been a reason for all the protection legislation that has been law at one time or another, and that reason is that the ultra-capitalists will do ANYTHING to make more money. This proves it.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Please see post #18.
It was meant as a response to your post.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)This has me all disturbed.
Every time they deregulate some law we are in for eventual problems. Like Glass Steagal, most of these regulations were adopted with very good intentions back when the legislative process and democracy were functioning in this country.
As we know democracy is no longer functioning all that well.
The trade deal advocates know we do not want these clandestine agreements. Their attitude is, "Try to stop us." (we have this nation by the ass)
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)I am shocked at how 75% or more of the American people can be for or against something, and our politicians still go against the large majority. I don't know what has changed that much. I don't know that any legislation passed because of a need as much as because of the will of the people who held the politicians' feet to the fire. But all of a sudden, they don't even care about that. The "try to stop us" attitude is so prevalent, and I cannot comprehend it.....I only assume that they 1) believe that the large coffers that they amass from siding with business and wealth will win the elections (and they often do with all the false ads), and 2) they think that we are too lazy to really do anything to stop them. They may be right. Sigh.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Our Grandfathers and Great Uncles Shed Blood and DIED to get of these "regulations" imposed on "Free Market" Capitalism to protect them and their children. This is HISTORY. We have already tried unregulated Capitalism...and it didn't work well....except for the top 1%. That era was called the "Gilded Age".
Unfortunately, the History of the LABOR Movement has been removed from our textbooks,
and the Democratic Party no longer highlights the importance of Organized LABOR for the Working Class. Most of the kids today have no fucking idea of what it cost to have these "regulations" imposed on the Corporations. They will have to fight all these battles all over again.
Given the World, Capital will always be able to outrun "regulations" that protect Human Rights and the Environment, and THAT is the purpose of these "Free Trade" agreements.
It takes YEARS...even DECADES for people to organize, petition their governments for protections,
and actually have these protections enacted.Corporations will be able to simply pack up and move overnight to a country with corrupt leaders and loose regulations on Human Rights and Environmental Protections.
If you Work for a Living, don't trust ANY politician who espouses a belief in "Free Trade", "Free Markets", or an "Invisible Hand". None of these things exist, and that politician is NOT your friend.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)That is the saddest thing you stated, and all too true. If things don't change, the new fight may have to be worse than the first fights, and they were no picnic. Decades. In reading a biography of Mother Jones, I was shocked that many of the workers who were striking would be out for years.....YEARS. Do we have it in us to do that again? And why should we have to?
I also have disgust for people who are the champions of "free trade", "free markets", etc. I remember learning when I was young that nothing is "free". Other things that make me run in the opposite direction are statements like "we are a capitalist society" and "this is a nation of God", because those are the ones who are going to screw you the worst.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)"If you Work for a Living, don't trust ANY politician who espouses a belief in "Free Trade", "Free Markets", or an "Invisible Hand". None of these things exist, and that politician is NOT your friend."
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)far too many people don't realize that people risked cracked skulls and worse to get us some of the things we enjoy, like paid vacations, 40 hour work weeks, etc. I am 46 years old, and I see all those gains that were made by those before us slowly slipping away.
WTF We know what financial deregulation has done to our economy!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)and it is going to happen again ...because they were not prosecuted. These people should be in prison and then thrown out of the country when they get out.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Awesome metaphor of where it's all heading...
malaise
(268,724 posts)<snip>
SITA: Another Secret Deal
By nadinabbott on June 28, 2014 ( 0 )
June 28, 2014 (San Diego)
The Service in Trade Agreement is one of a series of Trade Agreements under negotiations, and like the Transpacific Trade Pact, (TTP) this is being negotiated in secret. Wikileaks got its hands on some of it, and what we have has been analyzed by Professor Jane Kelsey, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
The document points out several things. The first is that we do not have the full document. So a fair complete analysis is not possible. The second point is that:
Non-disclosure makes it impossible for policy-makers, regulators, non-government supervisory agencies, opposition political parties, financial services firms, academics and other commentators to understand the intended meaning or apply thetext with confidence.
If Kelsey is correct, the agreement will extend our current weak financial regulations to all treaty nations, This means that what goes on in the US will go everywhere else.
Why should Americans pay attention? Well, for starters whenever we have treaty law that is ratified, it becomes US Law. One thing that this treaty will do is target issues that the industry believes are obstacles to their well being and future growth. Among them are these two jewels that should get all our collective attention:
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Repeat after me, We will not obey.
newthinking
(3,982 posts)And powerful players are making every play they can to disguise it and keep a ponsy scheme moving at the same time they steal as much as they can.
They are investing the money in Real Estate throughout the world (which is why wordwide inflation of real estate is leaving the world's population behind.
They are preparing for the inevitable currency collapse and trying to get what they can before it happens while moving as much as possible into tangible assets so they can retain their wealth afterwards.
Remember how BushCo was buying up huge plots of land in South America?
Anansi1171
(793 posts)A reserve of fresh water in the middle of the continent.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)These agreement hurt the US to the benefit of the Multi-nationals and these negotiators and politicians know it.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Most likely since Iran -Contra circa 1979.
They have been systematically adopting trade policies that intentionally harm American workers for a very long time. It has only recently become so obvious.
We have to stop it.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)WikiLeaks Reveals True Intent of Secret TiSA Trade Talks
A WikiLeaks exposé has revealed the true intent behind secret 50-country negotiations on a new financial services chapter of the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) at the WTO in Geneva.
International Trade Union Federation
26 June 2014
The draft agreement being discussed by government officials is aimed at weakening financial regulation and giving extra market access to hedge funds, banks, insurers and other providers.
Sharan Burrow, ITUC General Secretary, said, Governments are negotiating away financial regulation in secret, instead of tackling the unfinished regulation task that triggered the current global economic crisis in 2007. It defies belief that they are actually planning to help the already too big to fail banks and other financial conglomerates to expand."
It is deeply disturbing to find out that governments are getting ready to exempt from or expedite the approval of some of the most toxic insurance products, like Credit Default Swaps, and also allow hedge funds and banks to launch unlimited new products without proper controls.
The leaked draft includes self-defeating provisions that would reinforce the power of big finance over democratic processes, with bizarre clauses such as:
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, prudential measures are allowed in order to ensure the integrity and stability of a Partys financial system, but (w)here such measures do not conform with the provisions of this Agreement, they shall not be used ( ).
SOURCE w details: http://www.ituc-csi.org/wikileaks-reveals-true-intent-of
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
ancianita
(35,950 posts)Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)One of the best shows on TV.
snot
(10,504 posts)this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Boston_bomb_scare
I love your zombie gif.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)which is one of the better shows on TV.
snot
(10,504 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)So stop saying that.
I'm sure it is all good for us peed-ons. They need us. We are important to them. They care about us. We should just trust them.
Uncle Joe
(58,300 posts)Thanks for the thread, snot.
snot
(10,504 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)snot
(10,504 posts). . . too bad Obama's admin did a total about-face on that (viz. the Transpacific Partnership Agreement, and I think there's an Atlantic equivalent in the works? but forget what it's called . . . )