Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:41 PM Jun 2014

Obama wants to spend $500 million aiding "good" Syrian rebels. Good policy or not?

I say not good policy.

In the first place, who are we to be overthrowing the governments of other countries?

In the second place, this is a very cynical exercise. The Syrian government has already strategically defeated the armed uprising against it. Assad isn't going anywhere. All our assistance will do is get more Syrians killed as a means of "pressuring" Assad to resign. Our policy appears to be to bleed Syria even further.

In the third place, we are already seeing the results of the instability we helped foster in Syria (the CIA has been secretly doing the same thing Obama now proposes to do publicly for several years now.) Now, we have very scary jihadis running rampant in Syria and Iraq.

In the fourth place, don't we have something better to do with $500 million?

I think US involvement in Syria should be limited to supplying humanitarian assistance.

I feel sorry for Obama. The Middle East is an inferno right now. But this is not the right path.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama wants to spend $500 million aiding "good" Syrian rebels. Good policy or not? (Original Post) Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 OP
I would like Obama to want to spend $500 million aiding "good" Americans who are poor Autumn Jun 2014 #1
+1 theHandpuppet Jun 2014 #4
Not! n/t wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #2
Not +1 Wwagsthedog Jun 2014 #6
Six Weeks Ago It Would Have Been a Reasonable Policy, Comrade The Magistrate Jun 2014 #3
I would disagree that it would have been good policy a few weeks ago. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #10
Incoherence Often Happens in Middle Eastern Policy, Comrade The Magistrate Jun 2014 #13
People who value their sanity and principles have no business in the region. Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #18
That would have been even worse than the situation now. CJCRANE Jun 2014 #20
Different Factions, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2014 #22
Factions join together to become bigger factions. CJCRANE Jun 2014 #23
Not While Actually Shooting At One Another, Sir The Magistrate Jun 2014 #24
Some of the other factions have already joined ISIS, after opposing them. CJCRANE Jun 2014 #25
by all means let's jump in the middle of another middle east civil war... KG Jun 2014 #5
Not good policy. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2014 #7
So 'good' Syrian rebels are our Framily now? leftstreet Jun 2014 #8
Very bad, very wrong, extremely, egregiously, horribly, awfully wrong. scarletwoman Jun 2014 #9
At this point, only the most devout cheerleaders support this crap quinnox Jun 2014 #11
Oh, come on now IDemo Jun 2014 #14
Start the bidding at absurd and see how low we can go. TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #12
Nothing good will come of it. bemildred Jun 2014 #15
It's, at best, an expensive exercise in futility. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #16
Idiocy. It will lead to more deaths and that is $500 million that won't go to alleviate US morningfog Jun 2014 #17
Bad policy. former9thward Jun 2014 #19
Uhhh, not exactly customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #32
Very bad policy angrychair Jun 2014 #21
There are no "good" rebels. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #26
not. spanone Jun 2014 #27
How do we know who they are? CanonRay Jun 2014 #28
Not !!! SamKnause Jun 2014 #29
Since day 1 of the revolution Assad has said that anyone who opposes him is a terrorist. pampango Jun 2014 #30
Its not like the rebels are making it hard for him jamzrockz Jun 2014 #35
Bad policy Tetris_Iguana Jun 2014 #31
it's a start. Mosby Jun 2014 #33
Good rebels jamzrockz Jun 2014 #34

Autumn

(45,026 posts)
1. I would like Obama to want to spend $500 million aiding "good" Americans who are poor
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jun 2014

and could use the help.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
3. Six Weeks Ago It Would Have Been a Reasonable Policy, Comrade
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jun 2014

Not today. Today Assad is our ally, as is Khomeine....

"States have neither enemies nor friends, only interests."

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
10. I would disagree that it would have been good policy a few weeks ago.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jun 2014

The only thing that has changed is that blowback from the Syrian intervention (by Saudis Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and us) now threatens the government in Iraq as well.

That said, we are truly in bizarro world now We are effectively allied with Assad, Maliki, and Iran against ISIS, while at the same time, we are attempting to overthrow Assad and believe Iran is the bogeyman.

Our policy in the region seems incoherent and self-contradictory. Again, I feel sorry for Obama. The whole region seems to be a seething cauldron right now. And all Obama wanted was to pivot to the Pacific.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
13. Incoherence Often Happens in Middle Eastern Policy, Comrade
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 01:26 PM
Jun 2014

For a while, England was paying subsidies to both the Hashemite al'Husseini and ibn'Saud, while those two fought open battles with one another.

People who are not quick on their feet and able to change face on a second's notice have no business in the region.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
20. That would have been even worse than the situation now.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:15 PM
Jun 2014

At least now there is a small amount of deniability.

Imagine if America had *officially* supplied arms to the rebels, who then turned around and invaded Iraq!

Of course, it's even more absurd to supply them with arms now.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
22. Different Factions, Sir
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:24 PM
Jun 2014

People here might have little understanding of the various rifts and divides, but the locals appreciate them keenly. Free Syrian Army types, and others, have been engaged in combat with the I.S.I.L. people for a couple of months at least.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
23. Factions join together to become bigger factions.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:28 PM
Jun 2014

Factions hide their intentions.

Bigger factions take over smaller factions.

I understand it well enough.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
24. Not While Actually Shooting At One Another, Sir
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:33 PM
Jun 2014

it is a matter of plain, well-known fact that the various factions opposing Assad could have a dandy civil war all on their own. It is not a sham put on to deceive or impress outsiders.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
25. Some of the other factions have already joined ISIS, after opposing them.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:37 PM
Jun 2014

ISIS have the best propaganda, organization and motivation.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
7. Not good policy.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:55 PM
Jun 2014

The "good" rebels could find themselves forced into an alliance with the "bad" rebels if Assad still manages to gain the upper hand (and with Russian and Iranian backing, why wouldn't he) or the "bad" rebels may simply decide to overpower the "good" rebels and take all those shiny new toys.

leftstreet

(36,103 posts)
8. So 'good' Syrian rebels are our Framily now?
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jun 2014

I'm so confused

It was easy to follow along when you had yer Axis of Evil to be Smoked Out

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
9. Very bad, very wrong, extremely, egregiously, horribly, awfully wrong.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jun 2014

I totally agree with everything you wrote.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
11. At this point, only the most devout cheerleaders support this crap
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jun 2014

you have to be a really blind or adoring follower type to support some of this crap Obama has done.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
14. Oh, come on now
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 01:27 PM
Jun 2014

I have it on good word that the rebels will institute a Solar Panel on Every Rooftop initiative along with providing free college tuition for women.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
17. Idiocy. It will lead to more deaths and that is $500 million that won't go to alleviate US
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:10 PM
Jun 2014

poverty or rebuild infrastructure.

former9thward

(31,964 posts)
19. Bad policy.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:15 PM
Jun 2014

The $500 million will 1) go down a rat hole or 2) will eventually land in the hands of ISIS/Al Qaeda groups or 3) throw more gasoline on the Middle East fire or 4) some combination of the first three.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
32. Uhhh, not exactly
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 11:56 PM
Jun 2014

Whatever fireworks we shoot off ineffectively in Syria will have to be replenished by the US taxpayer, and the money goes to US defense contractors, who would take serious issue with you calling them a rat hole.

I argue semantically that they are rats, and not simply the dwelling place for vermin.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
26. There are no "good" rebels.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 02:54 PM
Jun 2014

The govt is not "good". IMO, if we pick a side, we're gonna get burned no matter which side we pick. Best to stay out of the fight.

CanonRay

(14,094 posts)
28. How do we know who they are?
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 04:21 PM
Jun 2014

I mean that seriously. Do we trust CIA intelligence to tell us which ones are the "good" ones. Do they wear a special color? What's the hand sign for the good ones? I'm not convinced we won't be giving weapons to ISIL, or Al Quaida, or some other jihadists.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
30. Since day 1 of the revolution Assad has said that anyone who opposes him is a terrorist.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 09:19 PM
Jun 2014

I believe him. Why would he lie?

"You are with me or you are with the terrorists." He learned from the master.

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
35. Its not like the rebels are making it hard for him
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:35 AM
Jun 2014

Suicide bombings of civilian areas, executions of civilians and POW, alliances with Al Qaeda, "liberating" civilian areas that are opposed to them etc etc. These guys are bad bad guys and the US should have nothing to do with them. Btw I have video evidence that the FSA engage in suicide bombings.

Tetris_Iguana

(501 posts)
31. Bad policy
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 09:32 PM
Jun 2014

But since the whole Middle East is now a global proxy war- why the heck not?

Not like our government would take the high road...

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
34. Good rebels
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:31 AM
Jun 2014

Did John McCain vet them for us? Regardless, I think this war has gone long enough and I am sure the majority of the Syria people want this stalemate to end. The rebels are not going to topple Assad so why not just give up and spare the Syria people more death and destruction?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama wants to spend $500...