Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rurallib

(62,406 posts) Sun Jun 29, 2014, 09:40 PM Jun 2014

Mark your calendar to pull up SCOTUSblog live blogging at 10AM eastern

tomorrow.
let us hope we get two wins.
I am sure pessimistic, though.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mark your calendar to pull up SCOTUSblog live blogging at 10AM eastern (Original Post) rurallib Jun 2014 OP

Sorry for the ignorance but yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #1

Public employee unions rurallib Jun 2014 #2

Thank you! yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #3

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)

1. Sorry for the ignorance but

Reply to rurallib (Original post)

Sun Jun 29, 2014, 10:40 PM

Jun 2014

what is the other case? I know of Holly Lobby, but I am unaware of the other case....thank you!!!!

rurallib

(62,406 posts)

2. Public employee unions

Reply to yeoman6987 (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 30, 2014, 07:25 AM

Jun 2014

"The Court has also not yet ruled on Harris v. Quinn, in which the Court is considering whether a group of home health care providers who work for the state of Illinois can be required to provide financial support to a union that represents them."

http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/monday-round-up-222/#more-214361

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)

3. Thank you!

Reply to rurallib (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 30, 2014, 07:27 AM

Jun 2014

I think we want this right? The only thing is can those Home Health Care Providers afford to have monies taken from the check for the union. I am all for unions, but some may not be able to afford the financial hit.

Reply to this discussion