Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:35 AM Jun 2014

How Vermont really got universal health care

<snip>

Most mainstream commentary on "Green Mountain Care" has tended to focus on the progressive politics of the state's leaders. The Atlantic reported that it was, "the culmination of decades of work by progressive politicians in the state." There was also, predictably, a fair amount of talk about Bernie Sanders, Vermont's popular progressive Senator, who had been advocating for a single-payer system for decades.

"I am very proud that my home state of Vermont is now taking big steps to lead the nation in health care by moving forward on a plan to establish a single payer health-care system that puts the interests of patients over chasing profits," Sanders wrote after Act 48 passed, in a Guardian piece. In the most surprising of moves, The New York Times (preferred paper of liberals who still blame Bush's election on Ralph Nader) ran an op-ed by Molly Worthen, saying a great many nice things about Vermont's most popular third party. "Mr. Shumlin is a Democrat, and the bill's passage is a credit to his party," wrote Worthen, "Yet a small upstart spent years building support for reform and nudging the Democrats left: the Vermont Progressive Party."

<snip>

Peter Shumlin had, narrowly, won the gubernatorial election of 2010, snagging 49.44 percent of the vote, while his Republican opponent got 47.69 percent. The Progressive Party agreed to sit out the election if Shumlin backed universal health care. "In the end Shumlin became [the Democrats'] candidate having campaigned on single payer," Chris Pearson, Leader of the Vermont Progressive Party in the Vermont House of Representatives, told me, "He narrowly won . . . so it's easy to assume that a Progressive running would have made his roughly 4,000-vote victory impossible."

Elected with clear expectations, and a sizable campaign gripping the state, Shumlin, the man who had once told organizers health care wasn't a plausible goal, began taking the necessary steps toward achieving single-payer and, in spring of 2011, Vermont saw its biggest health care victory yet. If everything goes according to plan, and the fight doesn't let up, it shouldn't remain their biggest.

"I would say that without the grassroots organizing to pressure the legislature, the bill would have continued to stall," Jake Williams told Truthout. Yet, when Shumlin passed the health care bill, he didn't bother thanking the Health Care is a Human Right Campaign, the Vermont Workers' Center, or the many activists who had fought so hard. Members of the grassroots effort stood behind Shumlin at the press conference, but they were cropped out of the next day's front page photos. They're used to it.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/24639-how-vermont-got-a-single-payer-health-care-bill-a-non-electoral-history

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Vermont really got universal health care (Original Post) cali Jun 2014 OP
Recs without Kicks again Alex P Notkeaton Jun 2014 #1
OMG jamzrockz Jun 2014 #2
he was a good ribbon cutter- and what I mean by that is cali Jun 2014 #3
That sounds like a good analysis. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #5
K&R silverweb Jun 2014 #4
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Jun 2014 #6
K&R Scuba Jun 2014 #7
K+R IronLionZion Jun 2014 #8
So do you think that a progressive thrid party should Vattel Jun 2014 #9
There isn't a progressive third party so that question is academic cali Jun 2014 #10
Too bad the question is just academic. A powerful third party Vattel Jun 2014 #11
It would be great. It's so frustrating that there isn't one. cali Jun 2014 #12
Presidential elections don't matter much for this. jeff47 Jun 2014 #13
 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
2. OMG
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:59 AM
Jun 2014

48% of Vermonters voted for the republican? I wouldn't have expected such a close race in a deep blue state like Vermont.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. he was a good ribbon cutter- and what I mean by that is
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:08 AM
Jun 2014

did retail politics quite well. And Shumlin is not so good at that and not all that personable. The guv before Shumlin and after Dean- for several terms- was a repub; Jim Douglas. Also a good "ribbon cutter".

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
6. Kicked and recommended!
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:12 AM
Jun 2014

We must have this for the nation. It should already be in place and could be except for a one-sided right wing media.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
9. So do you think that a progressive thrid party should
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:05 AM
Jun 2014

do the same sort of thing at the national level in presidential elections?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
10. There isn't a progressive third party so that question is academic
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:13 AM
Jun 2014

The Vermont Progressive Party is an actual party with members in the VT Senate and House and holding statewide office. There is nothing remotely analogous on the national level. It took many years for the VT Progs to achieve some kind of power.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
11. Too bad the question is just academic. A powerful third party
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:18 AM
Jun 2014

effecting change at the national level the way VPP did in Vermont would be nice.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
12. It would be great. It's so frustrating that there isn't one.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:35 AM
Jun 2014

I wish someone would take the VT Prog platform and adapt it to a national level and recruit candidates. But that would take a lot of money.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. Presidential elections don't matter much for this.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:22 AM
Jun 2014

The barrier to overcome is Congress. President only matters in that you need a president who won't veto the bill.

If you'd like an example, Bill Clinton was pushing a single-payer system. Congress killed it.

Work Congress first. President will fall into place as Congress shifts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Vermont really got un...