General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Vermont really got universal health care
<snip>
Most mainstream commentary on "Green Mountain Care" has tended to focus on the progressive politics of the state's leaders. The Atlantic reported that it was, "the culmination of decades of work by progressive politicians in the state." There was also, predictably, a fair amount of talk about Bernie Sanders, Vermont's popular progressive Senator, who had been advocating for a single-payer system for decades.
"I am very proud that my home state of Vermont is now taking big steps to lead the nation in health care by moving forward on a plan to establish a single payer health-care system that puts the interests of patients over chasing profits," Sanders wrote after Act 48 passed, in a Guardian piece. In the most surprising of moves, The New York Times (preferred paper of liberals who still blame Bush's election on Ralph Nader) ran an op-ed by Molly Worthen, saying a great many nice things about Vermont's most popular third party. "Mr. Shumlin is a Democrat, and the bill's passage is a credit to his party," wrote Worthen, "Yet a small upstart spent years building support for reform and nudging the Democrats left: the Vermont Progressive Party."
<snip>
Peter Shumlin had, narrowly, won the gubernatorial election of 2010, snagging 49.44 percent of the vote, while his Republican opponent got 47.69 percent. The Progressive Party agreed to sit out the election if Shumlin backed universal health care. "In the end Shumlin became [the Democrats'] candidate having campaigned on single payer," Chris Pearson, Leader of the Vermont Progressive Party in the Vermont House of Representatives, told me, "He narrowly won . . . so it's easy to assume that a Progressive running would have made his roughly 4,000-vote victory impossible."
Elected with clear expectations, and a sizable campaign gripping the state, Shumlin, the man who had once told organizers health care wasn't a plausible goal, began taking the necessary steps toward achieving single-payer and, in spring of 2011, Vermont saw its biggest health care victory yet. If everything goes according to plan, and the fight doesn't let up, it shouldn't remain their biggest.
"I would say that without the grassroots organizing to pressure the legislature, the bill would have continued to stall," Jake Williams told Truthout. Yet, when Shumlin passed the health care bill, he didn't bother thanking the Health Care is a Human Right Campaign, the Vermont Workers' Center, or the many activists who had fought so hard. Members of the grassroots effort stood behind Shumlin at the press conference, but they were cropped out of the next day's front page photos. They're used to it.
http://truth-out.org/news/item/24639-how-vermont-got-a-single-payer-health-care-bill-a-non-electoral-history
Alex P Notkeaton
(309 posts)Tsk!
48% of Vermonters voted for the republican? I wouldn't have expected such a close race in a deep blue state like Vermont.
cali
(114,904 posts)did retail politics quite well. And Shumlin is not so good at that and not all that personable. The guv before Shumlin and after Dean- for several terms- was a repub; Jim Douglas. Also a good "ribbon cutter".
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Way to go, Vermont!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)We must have this for the nation. It should already be in place and could be except for a one-sided right wing media.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)do the same sort of thing at the national level in presidential elections?
cali
(114,904 posts)The Vermont Progressive Party is an actual party with members in the VT Senate and House and holding statewide office. There is nothing remotely analogous on the national level. It took many years for the VT Progs to achieve some kind of power.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)effecting change at the national level the way VPP did in Vermont would be nice.
cali
(114,904 posts)I wish someone would take the VT Prog platform and adapt it to a national level and recruit candidates. But that would take a lot of money.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The barrier to overcome is Congress. President only matters in that you need a president who won't veto the bill.
If you'd like an example, Bill Clinton was pushing a single-payer system. Congress killed it.
Work Congress first. President will fall into place as Congress shifts.