Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 07:37 AM Jun 2014

Labor Unions Have a Choice: Fight Back or Die

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/06/30-0


The Chicago Teachers Union proved that there is a winning strategy available, if unions would only take advantage of it. (Photo: flickr / cc / sarah-ji)

With Democratic Governor Jerry Brown in office since 2011 and the Democratic Party winning a supermajority in the state legislature in 2012, one might think that organized labor was secure and riding high. At least, that is the impression organized labor projects during campaign season. But the Democratic politicians have used their supermajority to serve up a cruel bill of fare to working people, who are still trying to digest it.

There are two public retirement systems in California, and with the drop in the return on investments during the Great Recession both became underfunded. Governor Brown first targeted CalPERS (California Public Employees’ Retirement System) and managed to push through reforms that included raising the age of retirement and raising the amount public workers contribute to the fund. Unions offered no significant opposition to these concessions.


This year Brown has tackled CalSTRS (California State Teachers’ Retirement System), which covers K – 12 and community college teachers. In addition to increasing the amount the state and school districts contribute, he has proposed that teachers pay an additional 2.25 percent of their salary to the retirement fund.

One might think that the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) would have strongly opposed Brown’s proposed concessions from teachers, given that it is one of the more “progressive” unions in the state and many of its members are covered by CalSTRS. Quite the contrary: it wrote Governor Brown, saying it “would like to thank you for proposing a solution to addressing the current unfunded liability of CalSTRS” and merely asked Brown to extend the timeline for the implementation of some of his proposals. CFT explained why it embraced Brown’s proposal in this way: “CFT believes that all stakeholders are responsible for solving the CalSTRS unfunded liability.”
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
1. Labors biggest problem is that our politicians take them for granted
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 09:01 AM
Jun 2014

Because they know they will never endorse or fund a rethug.

So union support really only matters in the primary. In the general it's considered a given, and that means it really doesn't have to be earned. So it isn't- a fee strong words about how a candidate values organized labor, the turn around and have to actually "earn" that corporate money.

mountain grammy

(26,619 posts)
3. I've argued this point a thousand times.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 09:44 AM
Jun 2014

When union men and women bought the Reagan lies, it was the beginning of the end. It's not about abortion, it's not about gays, it's not about endless wars to force our ideology on others and it's not about Jesus. It's about fair, safe and decent working conditions, job security and a living wage. No one's going to give us a place at the table, we have to get together and take it.

Solidarity!

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
4. It cuts both ways. Lots of Toyotas and Hondas in the local school parking lot.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 09:48 AM
Jun 2014

One of DU's leading Teacher's Union advocates told me, on her driving a Toyota: "I don't have to support every union..."

Well, neither do I, I guess?

De Leonist

(225 posts)
5. Well
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:34 AM
Jun 2014

Can you blame people for buying cars that generally speaking get better miles per gallon than a lot of American Cars ?

Don't get wrong I do think people should buy Union Made Products made by American Workers. But at the same time with wages the way they are getting a car with better mileage just makes financial sense in the long run.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
6. Can you blame people for wanting a better education for their kids?
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:46 AM
Jun 2014
But at the same time with wages the way they are getting a car with better mileage just makes financial sense in the long run.


Similarly, charter schools just make sense. By paying less to a non-unionized workforce, charters promise to save money for hard pressed parents, who can't count on unionized manufacturing to provide a living wage any longer.

De Leonist

(225 posts)
8. I'm not arguing against Unions or Living Wages....
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:06 PM
Jun 2014

But rather I was stating that for the most part Toyotas and Hondas just tend to be better products for their price than what a lot of what many American Manufacturers offer.

Well unless your talking about Tesla. Which as far as I understand it makes an electric car comparable to any thing a foreign manufacturer makes.

As to Education, do I think we should cut costs on our schools through privatizing education ? Hell No

I think charter schools and other private non-post secondary educational institutions are a bad idea.

Quite frankly I think it's time we stop seeing the education of young children in terms of monetary cost and realize that the more we invest in their education the better we and they'll be in the long run.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
9. "Solidarity" means everyone supporting one another. If you abandon it as a principle, you
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:33 PM
Jun 2014

have no moral ground to demand support of others.

If you subscribe to the morality of the marketplace as to MY livelihood, why shouldn't yours be subject to the same analysis also?

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
10. Bingo. Well said.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:17 PM
Jun 2014

Situational solidarity has been as been as much a corrosive effect on the working class' vitality as the outright attacks by plutocrats.

De Leonist

(225 posts)
11. I wasn't saying that it was right....
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:43 PM
Jun 2014

I simply meant that with the economy and wages in general being crap people now have to spend their money far more carefully.

That's it. I wasn't making a moral judgment. Only pointing that because our economy sucks right now people are trying to pinch every penny they have. Whether in the long run or the short run.

I don't subscribe to the morality of the marketplace nor am I crapping on the idea of solidarity.

If you look up my namesake you'll probably get an idea of where I actually stand on the matter.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
7. The more money Wall St has, the less freedom we all have.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jun 2014

The American dream has been morphed into a corporate nightmare. Those who can't see it are either as quick as a sack of hammers or blessed with the moral and ethical scruples of Milton Freidman.
I think most of them mirror the latter, although unlike him, they would lack even the chutzpah to publicly admit it. Just quietly working and feeding the mouths of corporate dreams while publicly screaming how much respect they have for the Constitution, the rights of labor and the environment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Labor Unions Have a Choic...