Did the Hobby Lobby's insurance cover Vasectomy and viagra?

Bryant

Avoiding pregnancy while finishing education or getting a career established is fundamental to avoiding greater risk for poverty.

But then, why would they want to impact male employees? This is all about making women do what they want them to.

Get ready for a tidal wave of worms.

(from the open can)

The decision is only for contaception and can't include other medical treatments. Very Bush v Gore. I wonder if /when that will be challenged.

From Scotus blog:

Here is a further attempt at qualification: This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to mean that all insurance mandates, that is for blood transfusions or vaccinations, necessarily fail if they conflict with an employer's religious beliefs.
- See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014?Page=2#sthash.uEXdNi2n.dpuf

need is exempt. What a coincidence.

all you need to look at.

It appears. Nothing discriminatory about that, right?

but that is actually because there is no requirement to cover vasectomies in the ACA.

The idiots on the right either have no clue or simply do not care about the can of worms they just opened.

insurance? Maybe what is need is a beefed-up national network of free clinics for this sort of thing, staffed by doctors who can work off some of the student loans they carry, or something like that.

One of the rationale, as I read the interpretation on SCOTUSblog, was that the government could pay for the contraception, thus making the mandate not the least restrictive way to provide it.

But that's irrelevant given this congress, who will block funding

It appears to be heavily slanted into "We hate Woman" batsh* crazy decision file. Right next to the abortion one from last week. This is just a wow I can't believe they decided this book.

Democrats should RUN ON THIS ISSUE!!
The court hates woman, period.

Lets not shop or buy from any company
that does not support women.