Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,217 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:52 PM Jun 2014

Maybe they taught me wrong in school but....

what I learned in the seventies and eighties, that what was meant by freedom of religion was meant no one could force their religious beliefs upon another. In other words you could believe what you like, as an individual. That government and religion were to be separate.

How does the Hobby Lobby decision not force religious beliefs upon another with the power of law?

Freedom of religion also entails freedom from religion. How the fuck did this get so damned twisted.

Maybe it was my liberal public school education in Massachusetts where I received an inaccurate view of what freedom of religion means. Have I had the wrong interpretation all along?

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe they taught me wrong in school but.... (Original Post) boston bean Jun 2014 OP
I think so boston JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #1
Me, too. Am I ever disgusted. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #26
Catholic school grad here HockeyMom Jun 2014 #2
I learnt the same at a private catholic school BootinUp Jun 2014 #3
Because those women can buy birth control on their own? quinnox Jun 2014 #4
Really you don't? Go read Ginsburg's dissenting opinion on the matter. boston bean Jun 2014 #7
They are already paying for insurance coverage Bettie Jun 2014 #8
I believe this entails all contraception. IUD's, the pill, plan b, the patch, shots, injections. boston bean Jun 2014 #12
And it should all be covered Bettie Jun 2014 #16
I figured you understood. But I believe some might not think it all the way through. boston bean Jun 2014 #17
And yet Viagra is still covered for men...[n/t] Maedhros Jun 2014 #34
So if the road only leads to their church you can build your own road to go elsewhere!!! Tikki Jun 2014 #9
Will you say the same when you have to pay for essential medication? BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #13
Hobby Lobby would rather its female employees be barefoot and pregnant. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #28
Which is funny because they probably don't want to pay for maternity leave BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #39
How would you feel if they were allowed to exclude pregnancy coverage for single women? Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #15
True. You give them an inch, they'll want a mile. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #29
Hope you never work for Jehovah's Witnesses and need blood transfusion coverage. Starry Messenger Jun 2014 #19
Hmm, then I wouldn't work for jehovah's witnesses then quinnox Jun 2014 #20
No, they aren't. Starry Messenger Jun 2014 #21
In theory, yes. In practice - not always. REP Jun 2014 #22
Maybe women of the same religious beliefs need apply for work? lunatica Jun 2014 #35
Fundie Christians are deliberately moving the goalpost. Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #5
Exactly. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #31
There can be no freedom of religion with freedom from religion other than no one can make you have TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #6
Yeah, but that was then. MoonRiver Jun 2014 #10
It's all about which religion jeff47 Jun 2014 #11
Hobby Lobby is not a religious institution. It's an employer and should be held to the law. Gormy Cuss Jun 2014 #14
Right. The Activist Justices fucked over America today. nt valerief Jun 2014 #25
It's a pity at least one of these right-wing justices can't be impeached and then Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #32
Impeached. That's just a few letters away from impaled, isn't it. valerief Jun 2014 #37
I don't see this as them pipi_k Jun 2014 #18
No, the religious belief of NO contraception, boston bean Jun 2014 #23
That was then... joeybee12 Jun 2014 #24
Having attended a religious school that gave the same lip service, LadyHawkAZ Jun 2014 #27
According to the opposition, yep, you had it wrong. malthaussen Jun 2014 #30
Because the Catholic Church says so Bickle Jun 2014 #33
Ronald Reagon is still killing us maindawg Jun 2014 #36
I guess I had the same bad teachers that you did............ wandy Jun 2014 #38

JustAnotherGen

(31,780 posts)
1. I think so boston
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:54 PM
Jun 2014
I really think so. Here all this time I thought America was a capitalist republic and all along it's really a Christian Theocracy. Who knew?

Color me disgusted today.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
2. Catholic school grad here
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jun 2014

THEIR beliefs sent me over the deep end as just a teenager back in the 60s. I would NEVER work for a Catholic organization; non-profit, or now "profit".

BootinUp

(47,063 posts)
3. I learnt the same at a private catholic school
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:58 PM
Jun 2014

what it means is that the old battles must be re-fought forever.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
4. Because those women can buy birth control on their own?
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 12:59 PM
Jun 2014


Not seeing how this "forces" any religious beliefs on anyone.

Bettie

(16,058 posts)
8. They are already paying for insurance coverage
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:13 PM
Jun 2014

Which should cover prescribed medications.

My employer (general 'my'...I don't work for HL), being able to choose which prescribed medications my insurance can cover based on their religion amounts to their religious beliefs being forced on me...putting their holy book between me and my doctor and into private decisions about my health care.

And it opens the door for denial of all sorts of medical treatments and prescriptions based on 'religious belief'.

If you want corporations to dictate your health care based on the religious beliefs of their CEO, then go ahead. I'm not OK with it.

boston bean

(36,217 posts)
12. I believe this entails all contraception. IUD's, the pill, plan b, the patch, shots, injections.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:21 PM
Jun 2014

It's not just the oral pill.

Bettie

(16,058 posts)
16. And it should all be covered
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:35 PM
Jun 2014

I used the pill example because it was the easiest to illustrate my point.

But, I think that all but plan B require a prescription and/or procedure, so it still tracks that these people who are so concerned about 'government bureaucrats between a person and his or her doctor' are so very eager to be the jackwad between a woman and her doctor.

I know you get my point and I know I'm angry enough to lack clarity today.

boston bean

(36,217 posts)
17. I figured you understood. But I believe some might not think it all the way through.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:36 PM
Jun 2014

This covers all contraceptive methods and medical devices.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
13. Will you say the same when you have to pay for essential medication?
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:23 PM
Jun 2014

No, you won't. You'll expect your insurance to pay for it. And you'll really make a stink when it cost $30-40 a month on top of your already inflated premiums. All because your employer now has a right to determine what care of yours it will pay for.

Your post is needlessly obtuse. In the case of birth control, for most women it is the most important and/or only medication they will take for most of their lives. Because pregnancy is life-changing and dangerous--so reproductive planning is absolutely essential. And now it's not covered.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
39. Which is funny because they probably don't want to pay for maternity leave
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:51 PM
Jun 2014

childbirth, child care, or more children on their insurance. I am honestly shocked that the SCOTUS stooped this low, I would have thought they wouldn't have dared. Because it is so incredibly stupid.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
15. How would you feel if they were allowed to exclude pregnancy coverage for single women?
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:34 PM
Jun 2014

How about excluding pregnancy coverage for employers who weren't married in a Christian church too, since in the eyes of the HL owners' faith they aren't married before God?
Contraception is only one small piece of the pie. They'll be back for more.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
19. Hope you never work for Jehovah's Witnesses and need blood transfusion coverage.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:40 PM
Jun 2014

Pay for it yourself, your choice to live with blood.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
20. Hmm, then I wouldn't work for jehovah's witnesses then
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jun 2014

Aren't people free to choose who they want to work for? That seems to help in some regard.

REP

(21,691 posts)
22. In theory, yes. In practice - not always.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 02:14 PM
Jun 2014

I can think of many reasons why someone may find themselves 'stuck' at a crappy job with horrid employers: poor economy and few jobs available that they qualify for; transportation issues (such as being limited to public transport in a city/town with a restricted coverage area); unable to get days off to look/apply/interview for another job during business hours; needing a particular hours schedule to accommodate school and/or childcare. I'm sure there are others - including being desperate to maintain health insurance - and I've been in most of those places, and the jobs I've held have been significantly better than working retail at a chain craft store.

The lower one is on the rungs of the employment ladder, the harder it is to change jobs smoothly and without financial pain. I would hazard a guess that many Hobby Lobby employees are working there not because that is their dream career, but because it was the first or best paycheck they could catch.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
35. Maybe women of the same religious beliefs need apply for work?
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:51 PM
Jun 2014

Then everyone will be happy, although 'good' religious women, those who have the same religion as their bosses, wouldn't use birth control.

That's crap.

Anansi1171

(793 posts)
5. Fundie Christians are deliberately moving the goalpost.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jun 2014

They want their evangelical outreach to be state sanctioned and mandatory in public life.

If they could beggar us until we accept their salvation, they would be well pleased.

The irony, to many, is just how anti-christ all of this actually is. We have Paul to thank for getting their ball rolling.

TheKentuckian

(25,018 posts)
6. There can be no freedom of religion with freedom from religion other than no one can make you have
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:02 PM
Jun 2014

one or select any at all. The state cannot dictate your beliefs or require association.

The current mess is caused by the insistence that employers be the gatekeeper to coverage.

Hobby Lobby should pay a tax but plan selection (if we insist on such...stupidly) should be an individual matter.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
11. It's all about which religion
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jun 2014

See, some religions can't force their beliefs on you. Such as Scientologists, Muslims or Jehovah's Witnesses. They're the icky religions.

But Christian fundamentalists are the good religion. So we should be happy for them to force their beliefs on us.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
14. Hobby Lobby is not a religious institution. It's an employer and should be held to the law.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:28 PM
Jun 2014

That's what the activist judges on SCOTUS got wrong.
No one is telling the owners of Hobby Lobby that they personally have to avail themselves of birth control. They can quiver all they want.

Louisiana1976

(3,962 posts)
32. It's a pity at least one of these right-wing justices can't be impeached and then
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:37 PM
Jun 2014

replaced by Obama by a justice who sides with the American people, not corporate interests.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
37. Impeached. That's just a few letters away from impaled, isn't it.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:50 PM
Jun 2014

Not that I'm saying that's what I'd like.

I just want a drunk Cheney to go fowl hunting with at least one of the foul five.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
18. I don't see this as them
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 01:38 PM
Jun 2014

actually forcing their religious beliefs on people.

Instead, I see it as forcing the result of their religious beliefs on people.

Subtle difference...

boston bean

(36,217 posts)
23. No, the religious belief of NO contraception,
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:12 PM
Jun 2014

and it can't be covered in work place insurance, because again, their religious beliefs are NO contraception, is forced upon their employees.

Either making them do without, or making them pay more out of pocket.

They aren't just choosing no contraception for themselves.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
24. That was then...
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:17 PM
Jun 2014

Now we have 5 assholes on SCOTUS, two of whom were appointed by a President who wasn't even elected...

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
27. Having attended a religious school that gave the same lip service,
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:28 PM
Jun 2014

my takeaway was this: that's all it is. Lip service. What the religions teach on the subject is a little different from the public school version, "No one can force their religion ON YOU". They do NOT teach that it's not OK to force *their* religion on *others*; quite the opposite, because of course their version is the One True Way To Salvation and all must be saved. "Fishers of men" and all that. The oh-so-big-on-religious-freedom church affiliated with my school was of course also big on missionary work and spreading the Gospel of Believe Or Go To Hell For Eternity. Religious freedom was for them, not others.

And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
30. According to the opposition, yep, you had it wrong.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:32 PM
Jun 2014

"Freedom of religion," so the argument goes, is also freedom from having "secular" (or "humanist&quot views "shoved down the throat" of the True Believer. If that seems a weak argument to you, well, after all it's just a mask for the real "belief," which is that my hatred and desire for control is more important than your rights. Especially if you happen to be a female.

-- Mal

Bickle

(109 posts)
33. Because the Catholic Church says so
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:45 PM
Jun 2014

Check the outstanding conflict off interest. The head of the cartel, successfully having convinced much of the world he's a liberal, instead of simply better at marketing won't budge on this none. When one believes that they face eternal tornment for disobedience, perhaps they shouldn't be making binding rulings on issues.

Oh and their more tangible and real gods, fat fisted GOP donors and other scam artists can't wait to exploit this one to the max.

 

maindawg

(1,151 posts)
36. Ronald Reagon is still killing us
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:24 PM
Jun 2014

It was a deal with the devil that gave us the 80s. We were still deeply hurt as a nation in the 1970s. Wounded by the 50 thousand dead solders in Vietnam, the hundreds of thousands who suffered PTSD we all know one of those. We all were touched by the crimes perpetrated against us.They killed our president, then we had the embarrasment of Nixon. American was hurt but not angry in 1979. We elected a movie star ,an imaginary president if you will. We wanted to forget the mistakes of the past and Reagon offered a new start. Morning in America. It was all a bad dream. The Neo cons hadn't been on a crime tear for the past 18 years at all. The neo cons gave us a npresent. A Trojan horse if you will. A movie star who knew how to act coy and how to pose for the camera. A fatherly old guy who you could really trust. That the neo cons were the presenters did not seem important to anyone at the time other than my very young self who did not even vote.
The coup in 2000 was the second one because when Reagon made a deal with our enemy he committed treason. Just like Nixon. Before he even took office, he was a criminal.
We are reaping what we sowed, 34 years ago.
The neo cons have been exposed, and I think the populace is kinda pissed off by the way things are going. They are tired of the gun violence. They are worried about SS and they are all under employed. Even the republicans I know complain about working conditions.
I hope that we do not have to relive the battles already fought.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
38. I guess I had the same bad teachers that you did............
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:21 PM
Jun 2014

Except mine were in the fiftys and sixtys.

You may be wrong about one thing.
Its not the power of law.
Its not the power of religion.
Its the power of the god almighty dollar.

Got to wonder who the Hobby Lobby Lobby is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe they taught me wron...