I also tip my hat to Bill Clinton for nominating her.

All five votes for this abomination were appointed by Republicans.

With the attitude of the House it is hard to work against the tide of no.

I'm ahead of myself. Let's work on 2014 before we get too wrapped up on 2016.

Specifically, two by Clinton and two by Obama.

And the four of them provide any intellectual ability that this court wields.

.

Here's a link to the text and a summary from Talking Points Memo.

Shelby County

Not by the squatting POS who came between Clinton and Obama.

KNR

I believe she will go down as one of the great justices.
And I believe when sanity is restored to the Court, many of her dissents will be used as the basis of majority opinions.

"And I believe when sanity is restored to the Court, many of her dissents will be used as the basis of majority opinions."

Because to me, it's just good that the NSA got exposed. Everything else going on over the personalities involved has just not been on my wach-list.

But thanks for the link. Makes it very clear, without my having to search through all the arguments... gg is a sheepdip.

!!

Voice of reason.

Thank you justice Ginsberg, you are the best!!!

So Obama can get another shot before the risk of a Republican take over in 2014 and 2016

Who do you think Obama will be able to get through Congress, some wimp, plus no throwing older competent people on the rubbish heap.

Despite her actual age, Ruth looks physically like she's good for another 15-20 years.

100 lbs, 80 years old, often in a wheel chair because of the battering she took fighting pancreatic cancer in 2009. In the 90's she had colon cancer. Her mother died of cancer. She should have resigned in 2008 when Obama had a better chance.

I think by not retiring in a timely way she's taken too big a risk with the welfare of the country.

You can't seriously think she has another 12 years in her, which is what we'll need if a Republican President gets 2 terms in 2016.

is if Hillary runs. There is no credible Republican candidate against any credible Democratic candidate.

....a problem too and it could go Republican because Koch money thinks very locally and concentrates on regional wins while we are all distracted by the Presidency.

A Republican Senate will only confirm a real right of center judge and the nominee won't therefore be another Ginsberg. Unless of course we get a fighter for the President---like Warren.

Besides, since when did Republicans have to be credible to win in this country?

I think Ginsberg has risked the country by not retiring in '08.

I fear her age. She indicates she is going to die in office. I can only imagine if it's during a GOP/Tea Bagger administration?

GOTFV!

who fought this and "told you so" to younger women, I give Kuddos to her, and all the FEMALE Justices who dissented against their MALE Macho counterparts who their SEED determines women's rights.

Thanks

But I'll make an exception in this case.

You are on the correct side of history!

They've hosted others in the past.

to be a member of scribd and enjoyed their content. Then they went all profit instead of just advertisements.

Text documents are now gibberish (symbols) and pdf's say, 'you are reading a free preview' if you want more...

In other words, pay to have a copy of what we pay in taxes to support from our government. It's how media is denying us access to government documents.

Another way to tell us it's none of our business. It's their property now. And that they can turn it off when they feel like it.

Senator Mikulski, who I am proud to say is one of my Senators!

Many thanks to both!

I love that little lady. Can you imagine a "Chief Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg?"

She gets it. She remembers.

Where do the other women on the court stand?
I keep hoping madness like this will turn elections, but there are women in Red States that just pull the R lever because they'd never vote for a Democrat. Shame.
We need turnout people! Easier to motivate the persuaded than to persuade the knuckle-draggers.