Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:42 PM Jun 2014

*ahem*

...pssssssssssssst...hey...Hobby Lobby fundamentalist fuckwagons...

...hate to break it to you...

...but your big win today...

...absolutely guarantees...

...more abortions.

Less contraception = more unwanted pregnancies = more abortions, you fuzz-witted clown train fools.

Congratulations.

Word of warning: if you keep shoving yourselves up your own asses with such vehement velocity, a point will inevitably be reached when you simply cease to exist, and collapse upon yourselves like a dying star.

I am counting the days.

88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*ahem* (Original Post) WilliamPitt Jun 2014 OP
More... Wait Wut Jun 2014 #1
"Its all about the women" me b zola Jun 2014 #14
I don't. Do you have a link, cause I can't search worth a damn here. genwah Jun 2014 #52
More Canon Fodder ProgressiveJarhead Jul 2014 #83
Couldn't agree more, my dear Will...n/t CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2014 #2
It's not about abortion or contraception, it's about naughty ladies being punished for having sex. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #3
But those naughty ladies have to be having sex with someone ladym55 Jun 2014 #5
Exactly. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #7
That's the answer! abakan Jun 2014 #21
I have been saying exactly since the rumblings locdlib Jun 2014 #22
They would buy those just in case they found an unconscious woman. abakan Jun 2014 #24
they would only have to pay the co-pay, BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #44
not mine... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #86
Welcome to DU, locdlib! calimary Jun 2014 #28
Hi calimary and thanks for locdlib Jun 2014 #41
Wait, no male and female sex? LGBTQ for everyone? Okay, I'm in. (Well not just yet!) genwah Jun 2014 #54
It certainly cures that pesky pregnancy problem..nt abakan Jun 2014 #59
This is so true. I got into it with a person on fb who was responding to mnhtnbb Jun 2014 #15
bingo. nt awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #85
I've always said that the Catholic church should hand out condoms like candy. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #4
Plus, one needs to mention AIDS, in that argument. longship Jun 2014 #6
and more deaths. oldandhappy Jun 2014 #8
And so it seems we have returned to the fifties. WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #11
...when disgraced women were forced into homes for unwed mothers me b zola Jun 2014 #16
1850s? 1750s? 1650s? Initech Jun 2014 #38
1950s, when we read article after article of illegal, dangerous WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #48
Is that what we want to return to? AlbertCat Jun 2014 #53
Of course it was. WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #56
Don't fear. librarylu Jul 2014 #88
No kidding. My late father-in-law was a doctor. calimary Jun 2014 #31
A long time ago, possibly even before Roe v Wade SheilaT Jun 2014 #36
The title is correct PADemD Jul 2014 #75
Thanks. SheilaT Jul 2014 #79
but wouldn't that be bad for their investments in contraceptives? MisterP Jun 2014 #9
Yeah, but maybe that's what they really want. More dead or desperate women. nt valerief Jun 2014 #10
No, what they really want WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2014 #49
True. nt valerief Jun 2014 #58
But not for the girl in the photo. Kablooie Jun 2014 #12
Not all sex is consensual. jeff47 Jun 2014 #34
*NEWSFLASH* Skittles Jun 2014 #57
Usually intentionally...at least that is what I hope. Lucky Luciano Jun 2014 #64
no Skittles Jun 2014 #65
Yes. I think we miscommunicated. No disagreements from me. nt Lucky Luciano Jun 2014 #66
Yes, but I can't see how contraceptives could help a lesbian have a baby. Kablooie Jul 2014 #71
Oral contraceptions also aid in medical problems like endometriosis, myrna minx Jul 2014 #72
And that is what is conveniently forgotten in all the fundie discussions. AngryOldDem Jul 2014 #74
... Javaman Jul 2014 #80
True, of course they don't care. Damansarajaya Jun 2014 #13
Welcome to DU, Damansarajaya! calimary Jun 2014 #33
Thank you. nt Damansarajaya Jun 2014 #37
Please add the supreme court abakan Jun 2014 #17
Not in their world joeglow3 Jun 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #19
Jesus also said: dgibby Jun 2014 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jun 2014 #35
almost, but the Supremes also made exemptions for BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #45
Adam, hypothetical scenarios are the provence of Hollywood. saidsimplesimon Jul 2014 #84
Guess what their response will be? Stop having sex. Sex is for procreation ONLY!! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2014 #20
People will stop having sex when SCOTUS stops having massive buffer zones for themselves. nt valerief Jun 2014 #25
Yes, something tells me they will try that tired line. locdlib Jun 2014 #26
Ohhhh, silly locdlib, tricks are for -----dudes! BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #46
Unless a man has sex. n/t Aerows Jun 2014 #29
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Jun 2014 #23
I always said that once they got finished with abortion Aerows Jun 2014 #27
You cannot reason with these people. Moostache Jun 2014 #30
Even simpler test - ask them where in the Constitution a religious test is required for office. Initech Jun 2014 #39
Not just none. It prohibits any. nt sarge43 Jun 2014 #50
Products made in China, investments in contraceptive producers. nolabear Jun 2014 #40
^^This!^^ BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #62
Will...You assume they give a shit about who lives and who dies. n/t truth2power Jun 2014 #42
KAY 'n ARGH! Plucketeer Jun 2014 #43
So if women working for Hobby Lobby get pregnant, does Hobby Lobby pay enough for them to tclambert Jun 2014 #47
You make the mistake of assuming they actually care about unborn life BainsBane Jun 2014 #51
Sorry, Will, but it means even more children growing up in poverty. Think about madinmaryland Jun 2014 #55
We are all mad and discouraged but ELI BOY 1950 Jun 2014 #60
I'm too sad to drag out the Monty Python clip... MrMickeysMom Jun 2014 #61
+1 for fuckwagons! nt Lucky Luciano Jun 2014 #63
Not to mention defacto7 Jun 2014 #67
BOYCOTT Marthe48 Jun 2014 #68
It is just slight of hand. Bozvotros Jun 2014 #69
Time to dust off that old copy of Lysistrata!! n/t Stonepounder Jun 2014 #70
Eh BlindTiresias Jul 2014 #73
Great post. K & R n/a onecent Jul 2014 #76
Well said! chrisstopher Jul 2014 #77
Were I a political cartoonist, I would draw women wearing "Hobby Lobby Employee" buttons being WinkyDink Jul 2014 #78
"pay" for contraceptives Worsel Jul 2014 #81
You nailed it, WRP. n/t Duval Jul 2014 #82
Yes, the males on SCOTUS intended to saidsimplesimon Jul 2014 #87

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
1. More...
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:53 PM
Jun 2014

...kids on food stamps/welfare.

...kids needing an education.

...kids needing health care.

...other people's kids that no one gives a damn about. It's all about the women.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
3. It's not about abortion or contraception, it's about naughty ladies being punished for having sex.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jun 2014

Since stoning is no longer chic and acceptable, what better way to punish them by forcing them to either a) not have sex b) force them to have babies?

Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man. Thomas Paine


ladym55

(2,577 posts)
5. But those naughty ladies have to be having sex with someone
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:23 PM
Jun 2014

What with needing birth control and all ... Oh, wait. I forgot. It's OKAY for males to have sex ... but not with naughty ladies ... oh, my, this all gets so confusing when one is being a misogynistic jerk.

abakan

(1,819 posts)
21. That's the answer!
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jun 2014

No birth control, no male and female sex...Women are always blamed for getting pregnant. As if she was alone when she got that way.

locdlib

(176 posts)
22. I have been saying exactly since the rumblings
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:18 PM
Jun 2014

began about denying contraception. No birth control = no male/female sex. This would also eliminate the need for coverage for boner pills.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
28. Welcome to DU, locdlib!
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:44 PM
Jun 2014

Glad you're here! The more new members we have, it's (HOPEFULLY!) just that many more who can urge their friends and family to VOTE!!! It may simply come down to that! We CANNOT sit this one out. Believe me - the other side sure won't. But there are more of us than there are of them and if we flexed our numerical muscle at the polls every time, we'd have pro-choice Dems and rational thinking in every position possible.

locdlib

(176 posts)
41. Hi calimary and thanks for
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:45 PM
Jun 2014

the welcome. I've been on here for a bit, but I don't get to post as often as I would like. I absolutely agree with what you are saying. There is power in numbers and we have that advantage over them. I WILL NOT sit this one out and I won't allow the people that I know to sit it out either.

mnhtnbb

(31,382 posts)
15. This is so true. I got into it with a person on fb who was responding to
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:57 PM
Jun 2014

a post a mutual friend had made.

And here is what she said:

why should ANYbody but a person pay for anybody ELSE' sexcapades xxxxx (my name)?

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
4. I've always said that the Catholic church should hand out condoms like candy.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:07 PM
Jun 2014

Best way to reduce abortions as well as STDs.

longship

(40,416 posts)
6. Plus, one needs to mention AIDS, in that argument.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:25 PM
Jun 2014

And how a previous pope went to Africa to announce to the world that condoms didn't work... Or were evil Satan's idea... Or something like that. It didn't matter that The Holy See -- who apparently couldn't -- eventually disavowed that pronouncement. The damage had been done.

god is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, certainly one of the best religious polemics since Thomas Paine (of whom author Christopher Hitchens also wrote a biography).

Oh, and by the way...
R&

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
8. and more deaths.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:39 PM
Jun 2014

Women who die from botched abortions in the back alley.

Children who die from malnutrition.

Society will die from lack of common sense.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
16. ...when disgraced women were forced into homes for unwed mothers
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:58 PM
Jun 2014

I have three grand-daughters, the oldest is eleven years old. My heart is in knots for them.

Initech

(100,063 posts)
38. 1850s? 1750s? 1650s?
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:21 PM
Jun 2014

At least in the 1950s we made significant advances in medical care - which these dimwits don't seem to recognize.

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
48. 1950s, when we read article after article of illegal, dangerous
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:07 PM
Jun 2014

abortions performed by anyone willing to take the chance of not getting caught, of rich women traveling halfway around the world to have an abortion done by a real doctor in a safe hospital setting.
Is that what we want to return to?

calimary

(81,220 posts)
31. No kidding. My late father-in-law was a doctor.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:49 PM
Jun 2014

He told this story about driving a bleeding young woman to the hospital. She was hemorrhaging. Pretty much all over the back seat of his car. She'd sought a back-alley abortion that went bed, as most of them do, and she was actually on the verge of dying. He was a very moral very conservative gent. But that made him decide that safe and legal abortions were something that was needed - because they kept young women of childbearing age ALIVE and HEALTHY, so they could eventually have those babies and care for them and afford to raise them. Chances are if you were lucky enough to survive a back-alley abortion, you were often rendered infertile for the rest of your life. Wire coat hangers anyone?

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
36. A long time ago, possibly even before Roe v Wade
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:09 PM
Jun 2014

someone wrote a novel addressing this. I could swear the title was "The Afternoon Women" but I cannot seem to find a book by that title.

The events of the novel definitely take place before Roe v Wade. A doctor, whose daughter died from a botched illegal abortion gradually comes around to understand the need for abortions, and over time starts doing them. In the afternoons. Everyone in his city knows he does them, and for years he's left alone. There's a crisis when someone, a politician, a police chief, I don't recall the details, decides to shut him down.

And the reason he starts doing the abortions is because some time, maybe a year or so, a young pregnant woman goes to him asking him to perform one for her and he refuses, as he's opposed to abortion altogether. She says to him, "I thought after what happened to your daughter you'd understand." She goes away, but her remark forces him to rethink everything, and he realizes that he can save lives by doing proper medical abortions.

I wish I could recall when the book came out, or it's correct title. If anyone knows, please share.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
79. Thanks.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:26 AM
Jul 2014

I googled the name as I was writing my above post and it did not show up.

I recall the book as being powerful, especially as it was written at a time when Roe v Wade was still unimaginable. I'm reminded of the power of Uncle Tom's Cabin, written at a time when it seemed slavery would last forever.

Kablooie

(18,625 posts)
12. But not for the girl in the photo.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:52 PM
Jun 2014

Since Ellen Page has come out as rainbowed.

I guess the photo refers to her character in "Juno" though.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
34. Not all sex is consensual.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:00 PM
Jun 2014

Sometimes, lesbians need birth control too.

And many times, women use the same medication for non-birth-control reasons.

Lucky Luciano

(11,253 posts)
64. Usually intentionally...at least that is what I hope.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:39 PM
Jun 2014

Though they are obviously entitled to birth control too fit whatever reason they please.

Kablooie

(18,625 posts)
71. Yes, but I can't see how contraceptives could help a lesbian have a baby.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 12:38 AM
Jul 2014

Of course there are women who consider themselves lesbian but are occasionally bi, so contraceptives would be needed.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
74. And that is what is conveniently forgotten in all the fundie discussions.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:39 AM
Jul 2014

They're too busy painting women who use birth control as sluts who can't control themselves (see Limbaugh, Rush -- Sandra Fluke.)

I'm curious to know if there is any comparable medical benefit to Viagra, Cialis, etc. Thought not. But those medications are perfectly okay, and if insurance can't pay for them, Big Pharma will help! Because they're just so....needed.



 

Damansarajaya

(625 posts)
13. True, of course they don't care.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:53 PM
Jun 2014

Abortion has never been about "saving the babies."

It's always been about women having (gasp!) SEX.

If it didn't involve sex, the FundyCons wouldn't give a shit about it. For example, in-vitro fertilization results in some two dozen unused fetuses which are (or will be) eventually destroyed. You never hear about anti-abortionists picketing in-vitro fertilization clinics, do you.

No sex = no problem for the FundyCons.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
33. Welcome to DU, Damansarajaya!
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:53 PM
Jun 2014

Good to have you with us! Great point you make, too. It's all about sex. We all suffer the curse of the Puritans. Latter-day Puritans in this case. And when it's also a tool to further hamstring women, even better! Because everybody knows we women just can't make our own decisions now, can we? I'm surprised they even trust us with the grocery shopping or the house-cleaning...

abakan

(1,819 posts)
17. Please add the supreme court
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:04 PM
Jun 2014

In counting the days until some of them meet their demise...Couldn't come fast enough for me.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
18. Not in their world
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:05 PM
Jun 2014

The honestly believe by utilizing these 4 forms of medication, abortions were already taking place.

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
32. Jesus also said:
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jun 2014

Render what is Caesar's unto Caesar and what is God's unto God, so that would be the religious reasoning re: taxes.

As for the HL case, I have no answer-I'm still reeling from the SCOTUS decision.

Response to dgibby (Reply #32)

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
45. almost, but the Supremes also made exemptions for
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 07:51 PM
Jun 2014

other religious beliefs that could be harmful to one's health, like transfusions.

It's the Having Sex While Female--or Even Making Us Think About You Ladies Having Sex Even Though Birth Control Medicine is Used to Treat Medical Conditions Too-- And Trying to Get Away With It Without Proper Punishment thingy that the Highest Court in the Nation specifically ruled on.



saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
84. Adam, hypothetical scenarios are the provence of Hollywood.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:17 AM
Jul 2014

Welcome to a reality based community, imho.

This thread is about women's rights, not about Adam's or anyones' religious beliefs. We women have benefited from men who stand up for us, with the help of friends like Mr. Pitt.

locdlib

(176 posts)
26. Yes, something tells me they will try that tired line.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jun 2014

But then, the challenge for them will be to stop taking boner pills. Boner pills are marketed primarily to old men who are past the age of starting/making babies. Their primary function is to keep old men able to get it up so they can have recreational sex. So if people are only to have sex for procreation, then boner pills MUST be taken off the markets immediately.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
23. K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations!
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:24 PM
Jun 2014

Thank you, WilliamPitt! You are absolutely correct.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
27. I always said that once they got finished with abortion
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:31 PM
Jun 2014

they would come for contraceptives. I'm really sorry that I was right.

It isn't about women's health, fetuses or human life - it is about men controlling women's destinies since we can do something they cannot - bring new life into this world. The resentment that for all of the things that they think they are, that is one thing they are not.

It pisses off some men to no end, and they will do anything to control the uterus that they don't have.

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
30. You cannot reason with these people.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:47 PM
Jun 2014

They have foresaken reason, logic and facts eons ago.

I simply will apply a religious test to businesses - those that profess none and take no overt acts of evangelizing will have a chance to earn my business. Those - like the Hobby Lobby - that cannot help themselves or use religion as a bullshit excuse to not participate in the health care system or provide adequate and comprehensive women's health care options will get nothing but negative feedback from me on every forum possible - word of mouth, reviews, chat boards, signatures on forums, BBB, advertising, billboards, graffiti, TV and radio call in shows. I will go out of my way to hurt their business until such time as they stop openly advocating a religious position as terms for doing business with them.

I have a cautionary tale for these Jeebus freaks. About 10 years ago, in the Missouri town I am sentenced to...err, I mean I live in, there opened a "Chirstian" bookstore. BIG sign out front...HUGE lobby and way more square feet than they needed. They put this thing in a strip mall that was situated right next to the entrance to the public library for the county (not by accident I assure you). At first, they seemed to be busy and doing well, but within 16 months the place was gone and the signs and lobbies and inventory liquidated...these X-tian freaks may feel "called by Jeebus" all they want AT HOME, IN CHURCH, IN THEIR CAR, WITH THEIR OWN KIDS...I have nothing to say about it until you first say it to me. After which I will no longer darken the doorstep of your establishment!

Initech

(100,063 posts)
39. Even simpler test - ask them where in the Constitution a religious test is required for office.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:23 PM
Jun 2014

(hint: it clearly says there is none)

nolabear

(41,959 posts)
40. Products made in China, investments in contraceptive producers.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:40 PM
Jun 2014

It ain't the moral high ground. It's the love of money. We women are just the pieces they can get away with moving around to get it...until we organize.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
62. ^^This!^^
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:29 PM
Jun 2014

As women are likely a majority of their customers, they could easily put them out of business. And I sincerely hope they do.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
43. KAY 'n ARGH!
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 07:23 PM
Jun 2014

Yeah Hobby Dunces. I hope God puts a gold star next to your names. Of course, for all the unwanted, abused, aborted souls you've assured passage to, you might get something other than a gold star.

As I've said before.... IF there comes to pass, a "rapture" one day - there's gonna be a whole HELL of a bunch of disappointed folks wondering why they've been left behind. Five of them, for sure, we'll be wearing black robes.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
47. So if women working for Hobby Lobby get pregnant, does Hobby Lobby pay enough for them to
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:00 PM
Jun 2014

support their family?

Somehow I'm thinking that's not a part of their religious beliefs.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
51. You make the mistake of assuming they actually care about unborn life
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:26 PM
Jun 2014

Their goal is and always has been to use the state to control women.

madinmaryland

(64,931 posts)
55. Sorry, Will, but it means even more children growing up in poverty. Think about
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 08:42 PM
Jun 2014

the early part of the 20th century and late 19th century. That's what these motherfuckers want.

ELI BOY 1950

(173 posts)
60. We are all mad and discouraged but
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:24 PM
Jun 2014

lets' show our power...BOYCOTT HOBBY LOBBY and lets stay with it...We had Limbaugh on the ropes and let him off...Lets Not Do The same !!!!

Boycott Hobby Lobby

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
61. I'm too sad to drag out the Monty Python clip...
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:28 PM
Jun 2014

(you know.. "every sperm is sacred&quot

I'm so tired of what is happening to privacy, whether it be between a woman and her physician or talking about it here.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
67. Not to mention
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:44 PM
Jun 2014

the negative effect this will have on Republicans come next election. Republicans will be associated with undermining womens right to contraception. That will play in favor of Democrats. When that Republican light bulb finally goes on, they will be very pissed or probably at the most confused.

Marthe48

(16,935 posts)
68. BOYCOTT
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:50 PM
Jun 2014

When dumbass Papa John said he'd lay people off, when an Applebee's franchise said he'd lay people off, because ACA went into effect, I stopped being a customer. I don't want to get into quality of pizza or food. I ate at both occasionally, a treat for a retired woman who cooks like a grandma 25 days out of 30. But any company that demeans me or my sex or my humanity is on my boycott list. I never shopped at Hobby Lobby, and now I never will. I wish I could boycott the idiots on the Supreme Court who ignore 50 to 51% of the humans in America.

Bozvotros

(785 posts)
69. It is just slight of hand.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 11:12 PM
Jun 2014

We need to remember that the people really running the Republican party don't really give a fuck about abortion. In fact they really don't want a lot of Medicaid babies, preemies, fetal alcohol syndrome, and otherwise deathly sick or addicted babies jamming up the neonatal intensive care and jacking up their state deficits. They would look like the reptillian slime they are if they shut off the oxygen and IVs on 18 oz preemies and hydrocephalics that would otherwise have been aborted. But they need these dimbulbed single issue voters and they needed a win to keep them juiced on the Republican brand. So this little victory does the trick and doesn't do much of anything else except fuck over the women of Hobby Lobby who will have to find other ways to get birth control. Of course it is wrong. It is also cynical as hell on their part because they know the Supremes will never outlaw abortion for the reason mentioned above. But they have to look like they will or the jig is up. The republican state legislatures are doing all the heavy lifting against abortions and SCOTUS has done nothing but tease them along, knowing they can shut it all down if it gets out of control and expensive.

Meanwhile the Republican controllers will make sure that their Lindseys, Ashleys and Penelopes have the best contraception money can buy and quick trips to Canada or even a write off trip to France should she forget her pill. This also is an issue that will frustrate and exhaust our activists so that is a bonus for them.

BlindTiresias

(1,563 posts)
73. Eh
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:06 AM
Jul 2014

The goal is to restrict abortion and contraception within the bounds of the constitution (easier than you think) simultaneously. This is not a contradiction, this is intentional.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
78. Were I a political cartoonist, I would draw women wearing "Hobby Lobby Employee" buttons being
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:58 AM
Jul 2014

harangued as they try to enter a Planned Parenthood clinic.

Worsel

(7 posts)
81. "pay" for contraceptives
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:01 AM
Jul 2014

I guess it's too late to ask now, but did anyone ever ask any insurance company if rates for Policy A would actually go down if coverage for contraceptives were removed from Policy A?

Pregnancy and its' complications are a lot more expensive than contraceptives.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
87. Yes, the males on SCOTUS intended to
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:49 AM
Jul 2014

deny women their rights. This is not about a balanced judicial opinion. It is not helpful in mending the fabric of our diverse society, nor a reflection of equal rights under the rule of law.

I attended university during the bad old days of illegal abortions. For those with money, a physician could be found at a price. For those without money, well, these are not my stories to tell.

I have been a fierce supporter of birth control for many reasons, including the welfare of unborn children, preventing stds, and women's reproductive health. Some fools think they can legislate a religious morality, shria law, that goes against the physical well being of men and women.

Sex is not evil. I object to the condemnation hiding behind the curtain of religion/faith. It is the stereotypical response of old men, especially those of privilege and the wannabees of both sexes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*ahem*