Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:54 PM Jun 2014

US Conference of Catholic Bishops applauds Hobby Lobby decision

As you will see by the text I italicized, this decision has only emboldened those seeking to discriminate on the basis of "religious freedom" -- the USCCB has now vowed to redouble their campaign efforts (e.g., lawsuits) on these issues. Lovely! But never mind me -- I've been ringing this claxon for ages along with a few others here and we've either been ignored or told that we're picking on the church. Well, this is what happens when you try to play nice with religious institutions that discriminate. What happened today should come as a surprise to no one... nor should the disgusting decisions that will undoubtedly follow in the scores of lawsuits still to be settled.

http://www.usccb.org/news/2014/14-116.cfm
Supreme Court Decision on Hobby Lobby: A Great Day for the Religious Freedom of Family Businesses
June 30, 2014
Americans can follow faith in running closely held businesses
Court leaves open whether ‘accommodation’ violates RFRA

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today in favor of Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties means “justice has prevailed,” said Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore, chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty. The Court ruled that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “preventive services” mandate violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as applied to these employers to the extent that it would have forced them to provide insurance coverage for drugs and devices that violate their religious convictions on respect for human life. The statement follows:

“We welcome the Supreme Court’s decision to recognize that Americans can continue to follow their faith when they run a family business. In this case, justice has prevailed, with the Court respecting the rights of the Green and Hahn families to continue to abide by their faith in how they seek their livelihood, without facing devastating fines. Now is the time to redouble our efforts to build a culture that fully respects religious freedom.

“The Court clearly did not decide whether the so-called ‘accommodation’ violates RFRA when applied to our charities, hospitals and schools, so many of which have challenged it as a burden on their religious exercise. We continue to hope that these great ministries of service, like the Little Sisters of the Poor and so many others, will prevail in their cases as well.”

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Conference of Catholic Bishops applauds Hobby Lobby decision (Original Post) theHandpuppet Jun 2014 OP
Of course, their idea of "religious freedom" means the ability to force others to be governed Arkansas Granny Jun 2014 #1
wow the hyhperbole leftyohiolib Jun 2014 #3
Always has. NutmegYankee Jun 2014 #20
US Conference of Catholic Bishops should go fuck themselves. HERVEPA Jun 2014 #2
Indeed. truebrit71 Jun 2014 #6
Catholics disagree. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #4
Yet, if the continue to uphold the church RainDog Jun 2014 #14
The only Catholics whose opinion mattered were the five male Catholics who voted in favor of HL. eom MohRokTah Jun 2014 #17
And yet they still support the RCC with their presence at church and their $$. Arugula Latte Jun 2014 #18
I've noticed the various Francis promoters are silent today, nothing about the Renault or blessing Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #5
Several subjects they have been silent on lately. nt William769 Jun 2014 #7
There is no ethical way to defend a fraud. Dawson Leery Jun 2014 #9
The USCCB is a group of Theocrats that poses a greater threat than OBL ever did. Dawson Leery Jun 2014 #8
Pope Francis will be ecstatic. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #10
Dipsticks Applaud Fucksticks Blue Owl Jun 2014 #11
bookmarking this page RainDog Jun 2014 #12
I'll never understand how a society of single, celibate men are put in authoritative positions bulloney Jun 2014 #13
^this^ Owl Jun 2014 #19
I don't know how you non-Catholics handle it ellie Jun 2014 #15
A decision made by five Roman Catholic men, I might add. MohRokTah Jun 2014 #16

Arkansas Granny

(31,513 posts)
1. Of course, their idea of "religious freedom" means the ability to force others to be governed
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 03:59 PM
Jun 2014

by their belief system.

Yay, freedom!

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
14. Yet, if the continue to uphold the church
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:11 PM
Jun 2014

they force teachings they don't follow themselves on others who don't have their financial freedom to ignore the dipshits who want women barefoot and pregnant.

The hypocrisy is disgusting.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. I've noticed the various Francis promoters are silent today, nothing about the Renault or blessing
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:14 PM
Jun 2014

some bystander.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
12. bookmarking this page
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:09 PM
Jun 2014

when anyone wants to pretend Pope Francis is different than any other person in his position.

And I would really appreciate it if the Pope lovers would stop posting shit about him here for people to fawn over. It's an insult to women.

bulloney

(4,113 posts)
13. I'll never understand how a society of single, celibate men are put in authoritative positions
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:10 PM
Jun 2014

on marriage, sexuality and parenthood.

If I have a question on mechanical engineering, I'll go to a mechanical engineer for answers, not a CPA.

So, why does the RCC have people who, by profession, supposedly have zero experience in marriage, sexuality and parenthood, yet are put in a position to tell people how to live their lives in those three areas?

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
16. A decision made by five Roman Catholic men, I might add.
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:14 PM
Jun 2014

The only Catholic on the court who voted against it was Sonia Sotomayor.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Conference of Catholic...