General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHobby Lobby Won the Contraception Case, but the Christian Right Lost a Major PR Battle
By Amanda MarcotteMonday's Supreme Court decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby is, at best, a muted victory for the anti-choice movement.* The decision exempts closely held corporations from offering insurance coverage of contraceptives. The court argues this wont create a major burden for female employees, since alternative solutions can be found. Indeed, as the court noted, Health and Human Services already has a workable fix in place to help employees of religiously affiliated companies secure contraception coverage. This solution simultaneously exempts the employer from offering plans that cover contraceptives, while requiring the insurance company to sidestep the employer and offer coverage directly to the employeewho, after all, bought and paid for her own insurance by working. In his opinion, Justice Samuel Alito suggests that employees of closely held corporations could benefit from a similar deal:
Although HHS has made this system available to religious nonprofits that have religious objections to the contraceptive mandate, HHS has provided no reason why the same system cannot be made available when the owners of for-profit corporations have similar religious objections.
There might be a short-lived victory on the right over thisuntil it sinks in that insured women will continue to have their contraceptives covered by the insurance theyve paid for, regardless of their bosses opinions on the matter.
Thats why I see this entire thing as something of an embarrassment for the religious right. Ever since the lawsuits began over the HHS contraception coverage mandate, the claim has been that the attacks are not about sex but about religionwhich presumably has broader implications than simply resenting women's sexual liberation. But this decision limits the employer's religious reach exclusively to judgments about the employee's personal use of her own vagina, and no further. "This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to mean that all insurance mandates, that is for blood transfusions or vaccinations, necessarily fail if they conflict with an employer's religious beliefs," Alito writes.
more
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/06/30/hobby_lobby_decision_the_religious_right_won_the_contraception_fight_but.html?
mcar
(42,306 posts)Thanks. I hope the right pays dearly for this in November.
genwah
(574 posts)elleng
(130,865 posts)Good one.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)Right now, they have a reasonably secure grasp on power. Unless we show up en masse to vote (D) in November, this means jack squat.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Too true. The Radical Right gets away with this stuff because they CAN. If more progressive and moderate voters turned out in mid-term elections, or even if the every-four-years-novelty voters turned out for the off-year trench work, the Radical Right would be facing multiple Alamos At the polls.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)we could insure that we would see dramatic rise in turn-out both off year and presidential. Every state that has gone "Vote By Mail" has highest turnout rates in their history. We want High turn out we MUST make it easy for voters to vote and our current system of long long long lines just does not do that..Establish "Vote By Mail" or just let Republicans have their way with you. It is as simple as that...
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... and still get reelected due to gerymandeering