Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 04:54 PM Jun 2014

Hobby Lobby Won the Contraception Case, but the Christian Right Lost a Major PR Battle

By Amanda Marcotte

Monday's Supreme Court decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby is, at best, a muted victory for the anti-choice movement.* The decision exempts “closely held” corporations from offering insurance coverage of contraceptives. The court argues this won’t create a major burden for female employees, since alternative solutions can be found. Indeed, as the court noted, Health and Human Services already has a workable fix in place to help employees of religiously affiliated companies secure contraception coverage. This solution simultaneously exempts the employer from offering plans that cover contraceptives, while requiring the insurance company to sidestep the employer and offer coverage directly to the employee—who, after all, bought and paid for her own insurance by working. In his opinion, Justice Samuel Alito suggests that employees of “closely held” corporations could benefit from a similar deal:

In fact, HHS has already devised and implemented a system that seeks to respect the religious liberty of religious nonprofit corporations while ensuring that the employees of these entities have precisely the same access to all FDA-approved contraceptives as employees of companies whose owners have no religious objections to providing such coverage. … according to HHS, this system imposes no net economic burden on the insurance companies that are required to provide or secure the coverage.

Although HHS has made this system available to religious nonprofits that have religious objections to the contraceptive mandate, HHS has provided no reason why the same system cannot be made available when the owners of for-profit corporations have similar religious objections.


There might be a short-lived victory on the right over this—until it sinks in that insured women will continue to have their contraceptives covered by the insurance they’ve paid for, regardless of their bosses’ opinions on the matter.

That’s why I see this entire thing as something of an embarrassment for the religious right. Ever since the lawsuits began over the HHS contraception coverage mandate, the claim has been that the attacks are not about sex but about religion—which presumably has broader implications than simply resenting women's sexual liberation. But this decision limits the employer's religious reach exclusively to judgments about the employee's personal use of her own vagina, and no further. "This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to mean that all insurance mandates, that is for blood transfusions or vaccinations, necessarily fail if they conflict with an employer's religious beliefs," Alito writes.

more
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/06/30/hobby_lobby_decision_the_religious_right_won_the_contraception_fight_but.html?
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hobby Lobby Won the Contraception Case, but the Christian Right Lost a Major PR Battle (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2014 OP
Interesting mcar Jun 2014 #1
November depends on US. genwah Jun 2014 #3
Thanks, DonViejo. elleng Jun 2014 #2
PR matters very little to a movement that has a reasonably secure grasp on power LadyHawkAZ Jun 2014 #4
Too True Vogon_Glory Jun 2014 #5
If Democrats would get off their asses and start advocating for "Vote By Mail" Bandit Jun 2014 #7
There's no funtional democracy in the house, those guy can burn a bunny rabbit on prime tv alive uponit7771 Jun 2014 #6

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
4. PR matters very little to a movement that has a reasonably secure grasp on power
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 05:03 PM
Jun 2014

Right now, they have a reasonably secure grasp on power. Unless we show up en masse to vote (D) in November, this means jack squat.

Vogon_Glory

(9,117 posts)
5. Too True
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:00 PM
Jun 2014

Too true. The Radical Right gets away with this stuff because they CAN. If more progressive and moderate voters turned out in mid-term elections, or even if the every-four-years-novelty voters turned out for the off-year trench work, the Radical Right would be facing multiple Alamos At the polls.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
7. If Democrats would get off their asses and start advocating for "Vote By Mail"
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:24 PM
Jun 2014

we could insure that we would see dramatic rise in turn-out both off year and presidential. Every state that has gone "Vote By Mail" has highest turnout rates in their history. We want High turn out we MUST make it easy for voters to vote and our current system of long long long lines just does not do that..Establish "Vote By Mail" or just let Republicans have their way with you. It is as simple as that...

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
6. There's no funtional democracy in the house, those guy can burn a bunny rabbit on prime tv alive
Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jun 2014

... and still get reelected due to gerymandeering

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hobby Lobby Won the Contr...