Any ideas?

one increase our turn out and hope theirs is low. two, when practical try to reverse gerrymand. If you are a liberal, in a liberal district, but close to a close district, consider moving to the other district in october, vote in november, and return back to your district after the election. One only needs a utility bill to prove residence so move in with someone and get the water in your name.

and vote, we'll win.

Yeah we WILL lose some first round no doubt.
But Republicans can be broke-ass and out of work, too...and EVENTUALLY, they will put 2&2 together

Unlike Citizens United, for example, which can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment, Hobby Lobby can be overturned by Congress, if it wants to.

RFRA was passed in the House on a voice vote (no head count available that way) and by the Senate on a 97-3 vote, then signed into law by President Clinton. That was in the first year of his Presidency, when one could fairly say that he still had a glimmer of a honeymoon.

The Act has been modified only to say that it applies only to the Federal government, and not to the states. Today's case was the first significant test of the law as it applied to Federal law, and the law of unintended consequences may well have prevailed.

Yeah, winning that House back is only the biggest of the problems. We'll be lucky to hold the Senate by a couple of Blue Dogs after November. I look for the reich wing to be emboldened by today's decision.

to the states.

we already had the First Amendment that applied to the states, and the RFRA holds the Federal government to a much stricter standard. Today was really the first test of what that meant.

In any case, RFRA is not going to be amended, and it's clearly not going to be struck down by the SCOTUS.

Add the word natural before persons to 42 USC 2000bb(a). Then, add a sentence to cover organizations entirely or almost entirely religious in nature.

Nobody's religion needs protecting. We need protection FROM everyone's religion.

Religion poisons everything.