Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:38 PM Dec 2014

BREAKING : ACLU asks Pres. Obama to pardon Bush, Cheney, & company for torture.

No link yet - reported a few minutes ago by Rachel Maddow.

The logic is that it would be a legal admission of sorts that torture actually took place at the hands of the U.S. government, and would diminish the chance of it ever taking place again.

103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING : ACLU asks Pres. Obama to pardon Bush, Cheney, & company for torture. (Original Post) bullwinkle428 Dec 2014 OP
Link to opinion piece by Anthony D. Romero (of the ACLU) Solly Mack Dec 2014 #1
Thanks for including the link to the original piece! bullwinkle428 Dec 2014 #7
oh HELL NO! being chares in the HAGUE WOULD BE A BETTER DETERRENT. pansypoo53219 Dec 2014 #40
Bush and Cheney have already made it clear the US is not a party to the Hague treaty. librechik Dec 2014 #77
Two things: Kelvin Mace Dec 2014 #78
then we make sure HISTORIANS punish them. pansypoo53219 Dec 2014 #90
Even a squid squirts ink when in retreat. nt Eleanors38 Dec 2014 #60
The ACLU has been in bizarro world ever since Citizens United... Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #100
Kind of like giving a grant of immunity Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2014 #2
Ah, I wondered what the upside was. nt TBF Dec 2014 #22
Huh?!1 n/t UTUSN Dec 2014 #3
+1 freshwest Dec 2014 #16
To receive a pardon, one has to be convicted of a crime and serve at least shraby Dec 2014 #4
Same thing Gerald Ford was smoking? Iggo Dec 2014 #6
Was Nixon convicted when Ford pardoned him? Brother Buzz Dec 2014 #10
There ya go, the pardon's already written for him tularetom Dec 2014 #25
What penalty, resignation, referred to in the Nixon pardon, have Bush and company suffered? Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #103
Not sure where you got that idea. The President's power of pardon is absolute. (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #15
I stand corrected. I did read that someplace but it may be better described shraby Dec 2014 #41
I think that you are thinking about the guidelines used to process most normal pardons Gothmog Dec 2014 #47
And yet Don Siegelman remains in prison Doctor_J Dec 2014 #44
That's not true at all. The President's power to pardon is specified in the Constitution PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Logical Dec 2014 #21
I was trying to find where I saw that. Came up with zilch. I apologize for shraby Dec 2014 #45
Here's 2naSalit Dec 2014 #89
Nope. Pardon can happen any time after the crime was committed. NYC Liberal Dec 2014 #26
that is not true dsc Dec 2014 #28
That might be your state or something. There doesn't have to be any time served or even a conviction TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #43
FAIL! nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #46
That may be in some H2O Man Dec 2014 #71
um - no - anyone here at least 45 years old can personally remember President Ford - pardoning Douglas Carpenter Dec 2014 #82
Interesting idea, but they would certainly refuse the pardon. tritsofme Dec 2014 #5
And it would essentially doom them to remaining in a short list of nations Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2014 #11
There are countries Bush can not travel to. people have sued for torture & our courts refuse them. Sunlei Dec 2014 #81
Think of it as a Get Out of Jail, Free card Brother Buzz Dec 2014 #17
Indeed. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #20
They can't MFrohike Dec 2014 #30
A person can refuse a Presidential Pardon according to US Supreme Court decisions... PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #53
Interesting MFrohike Dec 2014 #96
Legally you can't refuse a pardon. That's why dead people can be pardoned. Recursion Dec 2014 #50
Live people can refuse a pardon, dead people are dead. PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #54
Huh thanks. I had no idea (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #56
Not sure it's that simple, see Burdick v. United States tritsofme Dec 2014 #64
And will conveniently play into the election of any Republican that voted to block GITMO closure Sheepshank Dec 2014 #88
Confession first. Pardon second. Iggo Dec 2014 #8
They have to confess to get immunity. Rex Dec 2014 #31
Bush and Cheney have confessed. truebluegreen Dec 2014 #38
Interesting. NV Whino Dec 2014 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author 951-Riverside Dec 2014 #12
Pardoning any figure in the Bush-Cheney Junta would represent a gross abrogation of KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #13
Okay this should be good, will hang around for the other shoe to drop on this one. Rex Dec 2014 #14
Interesting Recursion Dec 2014 #18
Pardon the people who gave the orders, what a fantastic idea. 951-Riverside Dec 2014 #23
I completely disagree with this idea. 100%. closeupready Dec 2014 #24
Hum I'm usually right down the line with the ACLU jimlup Dec 2014 #27
ACLU shows its colors MFrohike Dec 2014 #29
Trickle down crocodile tears Elmer S. E. Dump Dec 2014 #91
very torn steve2470 Dec 2014 #32
My feelings exactly - that's why I'm totally wrestling with this idea in my mind. bullwinkle428 Dec 2014 #72
But before he pardons Bush, Cheny & Company, Obama should pardon Don Siegelman. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #33
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ n/t truedelphi Dec 2014 #37
+1 OnyxCollie Dec 2014 #65
terrible idea for lots of reasons arely staircase Dec 2014 #34
Put them on trial Miigwech Dec 2014 #35
I would think that prosecution would diminish the chance of it ever taking place again Matariki Dec 2014 #36
Apparently that's a novel legal idea... n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #55
How many new terrorists would a pardon create? aspirant Dec 2014 #62
On the other hand, maybe The Hague? Matariki Dec 2014 #39
That would be to suppose that American Patriots engaged in torture/murder delrem Dec 2014 #42
Right because pardoning Nixon stopped all corruption in government. Drale Dec 2014 #48
I like the idea. chieftain Dec 2014 #49
If the only other option is to look forward, and that seems to be the case, then I like the idea n/t slipslidingaway Dec 2014 #51
That makes no sense. delrem Dec 2014 #59
Obama "We need to look forward" ... slipslidingaway Dec 2014 #83
Not a snowball's chance in hell of that happening Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #52
my head will explode if he does it AtomicKitten Dec 2014 #57
They need to be prosecuted for their crimes onecaliberal Dec 2014 #58
Like Ford did Nixon, except Global. Octafish Dec 2014 #61
But i saw a movie that said we kill OBL because of torture! Calista241 Dec 2014 #63
I lost my business because of 9/11. nilesobek Dec 2014 #66
Good point a person could even get beat up or shot for speeding nowdays But these mass killers? nada lunasun Dec 2014 #79
IIRC, Nixon was advised that if he accepted the pardon, it would be a tacit admission.... Hekate Dec 2014 #67
Wow, they are wasting their money with this one. Jamastiene Dec 2014 #68
until I see a link, I don't believe it. nt Javaman Dec 2014 #69
Solly Mack provided the link to the original NYT piece in post #1. bullwinkle428 Dec 2014 #74
yeah, I had read that. Javaman Dec 2014 #75
We don't pardon war criminals! B Calm Dec 2014 #70
I thought Cheney and Obama had already publicly admited... NCTraveler Dec 2014 #73
yea, that's what we do. Let's hurry up and do it and get on with our librechik Dec 2014 #76
No. But good news is they would still be subject to prosecution outside USA on point Dec 2014 #80
... napkinz Dec 2014 #84
would repugs pardon a dem? dembotoz Dec 2014 #85
ACLU sometimes like to stoke controversy. I'd rather this gang of thugs just .... Hekate Dec 2014 #86
Bullshit!!! Hang those fuckers. And do it on national tv. Hotler Dec 2014 #87
The onion right? Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #92
Pardon Siegleman and let those suckers go to jail. nt kelliekat44 Dec 2014 #93
No. After Cheney admits war crimes, maybe. Before? Absolutely NOT. HereSince1628 Dec 2014 #94
Seems to me that would only encourage it whatchamacallit Dec 2014 #95
Fuck. That. 99Forever Dec 2014 #97
Wouldn't convictions and prison sentences also discourage it from ever happening again? aint_no_life_nowhere Dec 2014 #98
"diminish the chance of it ever taking place again?" It's happening NOW! MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #99
Great story! Mike Nelson Dec 2014 #101
Rachel discussing pardons now on MSNBC napkinz Dec 2014 #102

Solly Mack

(90,762 posts)
1. Link to opinion piece by Anthony D. Romero (of the ACLU)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:39 PM
Dec 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/opinion/pardon-bush-and-those-who-tortured.html?_r=0



The spectacle of the president's granting pardons to torturers still makes my stomach turn. But doing so may be the only way to ensure that the American government never tortures again. Pardons would make clear that crimes were committed; that the individuals who authorized and committed torture were indeed criminals; and that future architects and perpetrators of torture should beware. Prosecutions would be preferable, but pardons may be the only viable and lasting way to close the Pandora's box of torture once and for all.

Anthony D. Romero is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.


bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
7. Thanks for including the link to the original piece!
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:46 PM
Dec 2014


I should have done my due diligence and checked out the source, but I appreciate your effort.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
77. Bush and Cheney have already made it clear the US is not a party to the Hague treaty.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:47 AM
Dec 2014

so that's not going to happen.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
78. Two things:
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:49 AM
Dec 2014

1) A pardon protects them under U.S. law, not international law.

2) They are NEVER going to be charged, even without a pardon. The U.S. is NEVER going to to prosecute a politician for war crimes. NEVER.

Understand, I would give a kidney to see it happen, but it just is not going to happen.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
100. The ACLU has been in bizarro world ever since Citizens United...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 08:54 PM
Dec 2014

Only god knows what goes on in Romero's brain these days...

Unless this "pardon" proposal is some kind of bait to destroy Obama, since the left would abandon him en masse if he was dumb enough to do this...

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
2. Kind of like giving a grant of immunity
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:41 PM
Dec 2014

Then their 5th amendment concerns go away, and they could be compelled to testify.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
4. To receive a pardon, one has to be convicted of a crime and serve at least
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:44 PM
Dec 2014

half of the sentence they received. They can't be pardoned without being convicted of something.
What has this man been smoking?

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
25. There ya go, the pardon's already written for him
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:11 PM
Dec 2014

All he has to do is change a few names and phrases, hit print in his word processor, and viola, instant pardon for our favorite war criminals.

And they'll be remembered as "pardoned war criminals" forever.

It's not as much fun as imagining them in prison, but I'm afraid it's the best we're gonna get. And if Obama doesn't do it, it probably won't get done. No republican will touch this thing with a 10 foot pole. And that includes H. Clinton, since she's personal friends with most of them.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
103. What penalty, resignation, referred to in the Nixon pardon, have Bush and company suffered?
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 03:49 PM
Dec 2014

Thank you for the post, important to know this as the mass media scream for pardons for the war criminals they helped to create.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
41. I stand corrected. I did read that someplace but it may be better described
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:29 PM
Dec 2014

as mis-read. I apologize for my error.

Gothmog

(145,107 posts)
47. I think that you are thinking about the guidelines used to process most normal pardons
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:41 PM
Dec 2014

Most administrations have pardon attorneys who follow strict guidelines to keep the process orderly. These pardons would not be subject to these guidelines

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
44. And yet Don Siegelman remains in prison
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:32 PM
Dec 2014

If Obama pardons Cheney and Siegelman in prison I will begin to support the calls for impeachment

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
19. That's not true at all. The President's power to pardon is specified in the Constitution
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:02 PM
Dec 2014

as follows:

and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

Bush pardoned some people preemptively, see:
http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html

Response to shraby (Reply #4)

2naSalit

(86,524 posts)
89. Here's
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 04:07 PM
Dec 2014

a reference I like that is easy to navigate:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/

Constitution; other legal documents and recent SCOTUS activity.

NYC Liberal

(20,135 posts)
26. Nope. Pardon can happen any time after the crime was committed.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:14 PM
Dec 2014

The ONLY limitations are that the president can only pardon federal offenses and that the crime has to have already been committed (can't preemptively pardon) b

dsc

(52,155 posts)
28. that is not true
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:15 PM
Dec 2014

Ford Pardoned Nixon sans conviction as did Carter with those who evaded the draft.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
43. That might be your state or something. There doesn't have to be any time served or even a conviction
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:31 PM
Dec 2014

H2O Man

(73,528 posts)
71. That may be in some
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 09:49 AM
Dec 2014

states -- for a pardon by a governor -- but it is not accurate for a presidential pardon for a federal crime.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
82. um - no - anyone here at least 45 years old can personally remember President Ford - pardoning
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:42 PM
Dec 2014

Richard Nixon.

tritsofme

(17,375 posts)
5. Interesting idea, but they would certainly refuse the pardon.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:46 PM
Dec 2014

As accepting would essentially be an admission of guilt.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
11. And it would essentially doom them to remaining in a short list of nations
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:49 PM
Dec 2014

A trip to Europe would likely lead to arrest and trial.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
81. There are countries Bush can not travel to. people have sued for torture & our courts refuse them.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:37 PM
Dec 2014

When you google travel for Bush- https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Bush+can%27t+travel+to+countries

I think only one person was able to sue Cheney? and his case dropped off the face of the earth, probably settled /w non-disclosure. (or worse happened to him?)

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
30. They can't
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:17 PM
Dec 2014

It's in the president's power to grant it, not theirs to accept it. It would simply be a fact, not an agreement between two parties.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
53. A person can refuse a Presidential Pardon according to US Supreme Court decisions...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:10 AM
Dec 2014

Burdick v. United States (1915):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States

United States v. Wilson 32 U.S. 150 (1833)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/150/

A pardon is a deed to the validity of which delivery is essential, and delivery is not complete without acceptance. It may then be rejected by the person to whom it is tendered, and if it be rejected, we have discovered no power in a court to force it on him.



Recursion

(56,582 posts)
50. Legally you can't refuse a pardon. That's why dead people can be pardoned.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:59 PM
Dec 2014

The pardon is a unilateral act on the part of the embodiment of national law enforcement.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
88. And will conveniently play into the election of any Republican that voted to block GITMO closure
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 03:51 PM
Dec 2014

Dems just need the balls to use the info in the report to publisize the type of politicians the RW truly are.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
31. They have to confess to get immunity.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:18 PM
Dec 2014

The elites way of admitting to war crimes, but staying out of prison and not travelling to some places on the global But hey with the money the BFEE has, don't be surprised if they buy a country or part of one move there and build their own mercenary nation.

You just KNOW the next big thing in global warfare are mercenary nations.

Response to bullwinkle428 (Original post)

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
13. Pardoning any figure in the Bush-Cheney Junta would represent a gross abrogation of
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:50 PM
Dec 2014

our duties and responsibilities under the Geneva Convention on Torture (signed by Reagan and ratified by the Senate during George H.W. Bush's presidency). That Convention has the same force and scope as the U.S. Constitution.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
14. Okay this should be good, will hang around for the other shoe to drop on this one.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 10:53 PM
Dec 2014

That was a smart move, either admit it or take them to court for what? Defamation of character or slander? However that does not mean they cannot be arrested and impounded (giggles) in another country like Germany. I dunno if that could be used as evidence in another nation's court, but they would have proof that the BFEE admitted to lying about a lot of things.

Put up or shut up. Fuck your museum you warmongering asshole. I'd love to see Cheney arrested in France or Germany.



 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
23. Pardon the people who gave the orders, what a fantastic idea.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:05 PM
Dec 2014

Doing so would prevent torture in the future and allow them to testify against the people they gave orders to.

GOOOO ACLU! They're really kicking butt here.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
27. Hum I'm usually right down the line with the ACLU
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:14 PM
Dec 2014

But this seems a little much. Why would we grant a pardon? It seems irrelevant and circumspect to the laws of the land. We should prosecute the hell out of those fuckers and the fact that we don't says a great deal about the immunity already granted to the top privileged sectors of our society.

I say NO! Prosecute the bastards and now may actually be the time as the people will be pissed when the report comes or leaks out and that could make it possible. I'd be satisfied with Cheney. I don't think Bush is actually guilty. The guys Cheney's yahoo. He doesn't have the brains to be guilty of anything.

Just streaming of consciousness thoughts ... yeah I'm definitely against a "pardon".

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
29. ACLU shows its colors
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:15 PM
Dec 2014

Seriously, who can actually believe this argument? Let the powerful guilty walk away scot free and somehow, magically, torture will never happen again! That worked great with the financial sector.

Damn, this really is just disgusting. They'll gin up a few tears, trot out some bullshit like "mistakes were made," and go back to their mansions while the rest of the country gets to pay for their sins. Yeah, more consequence-free behavior for the rich and powerful is really what the country needs.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
32. very torn
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:18 PM
Dec 2014

Pro = Bush and Cheney would be admitting guilt, even though they are forced to take it.
Con = The rat bastards would be out of hot water legally. At least in this country.

Damn.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
33. But before he pardons Bush, Cheny & Company, Obama should pardon Don Siegelman.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:19 PM
Dec 2014

Even if Siegelman did what is claimed against him, and I am not conceding that anything he may have done was illega., his act was nothing compared to the torture that Bush and Cheney and their staffs approved and ordered.

i differ with the ACLU on this. The harm that the torture did in at least one case as I understand to an innocent victim who was taken and tortured based on a false identification, cannot be healed or made good.

I think that Bush and Cheney should at least apologize first. Really. Torture hurts the soul of the victim. It is not an act that can just be walked away from. At the very least, Obama should not give a pardon unless Bush and Cheney and their staffs request one and admit to their crimes.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
34. terrible idea for lots of reasons
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:20 PM
Dec 2014

You can prosecute them. You can make them subject to foreign prosecution by releasing information that could lead to indictments abroad. But the president issuing backhanded Scarlett Letter pardons is a dumb idea.

 

Miigwech

(3,741 posts)
35. Put them on trial
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:21 PM
Dec 2014

American's need to see the trial of those that broke the Law. No special treatment just because the alleged offenders happen to be the Pres and VP of the US! We are all equal under the law ..... correct?

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
36. I would think that prosecution would diminish the chance of it ever taking place again
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:22 PM
Dec 2014

As opposed to letting people in power do whatever the fuck they want without consequence.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
39. On the other hand, maybe The Hague?
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:24 PM
Dec 2014

If they're not guilty they have nothing to fear vis a vis extradition. Right?

delrem

(9,688 posts)
42. That would be to suppose that American Patriots engaged in torture/murder
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:30 PM
Dec 2014

and did something wrong.
Major General Geoffrey D. Miller had no prehistory. No accomplices in high places through successive administrations. None at all. That's because shit happens, then it vanishes and yes, I'll have a coke and fries with that Big Mac. Who could imagine it without?

The US isn't a terrorist nation. Drones are benign. The US believes in the one true god, but except for in the "red states" downplays the sanctity of it, preferring to tout their love of democracy and freedom. They, the terrorists y'know, hate freedom. We all know that, it's bred in our bones. The hundreds of thousands of dead all deserved it. Muslims, Arabs, in this iteration, you know. Brown, or mostly brown - and speaking different languages. I'm sure the focus will shift for the next iteration of freedom loving US foreign policy but please, lets continue giving this iteration a righteous go. And why not? It's so much fun, it's so feel-good.

Terrorists are what the US is at war against, and the fact that the war is against terror justifies everything.
If you don't believe me, just read DU for a week or so. You're sure to be convinced.

chieftain

(3,222 posts)
49. I like the idea.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:42 PM
Dec 2014

To be effective, the person to be pardoned must accept it which would be an admission of guilt.I would love to see these rat bastards squirm trying to make that decision. My bet is that other than Cheney, the weasels would accept them.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
59. That makes no sense.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:39 AM
Dec 2014

Who wrote the script "the only other option is to look forward", whatever that might mean?

Where are you, on the highway to hell or something that you're white knuckling it onward? You have no choice to pull aside, find a room to rest, to pause and think coherent thoughts about the total surround situation? Is your reality entirely determined by FOX vs. MSNBC propagandists, by their mind-game?

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
83. Obama "We need to look forward" ...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 01:09 PM
Dec 2014

obviously you missed the reference.

http://www.salon.com/2009/01/12/obama_prosecutor/



Obama's justice department grants final immunity to Bush's CIA torturers
Glenn Greenwald

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer

"By closing two cases of detainees tortured to death, Obama has put the US beyond any accountability under the rule of law ..."

onecaliberal

(32,816 posts)
58. They need to be prosecuted for their crimes
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 12:38 AM
Dec 2014

The suggestion that a pardon would somehow stop such a thing from happening again is laughable.
This is not a nation of laws.

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
66. I lost my business because of 9/11.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 03:21 AM
Dec 2014

I had a lost luggage delivery service that was doing nicely. I was getting paid 1.50$ a mile one way. After 9/11 I lost the business instantly because the airport was swarmed with AR-15 toting soldiers and I was informed I needed a million dollars insurance to continue. This partially contributed to my decade of homelessness.

Fast forward to current events: It looks like they are going to get away with it no matter what. Its only us that have to obey the laws of the land, to follow the rules, to wear my seat belt, to have car insurance, to get a medical marijuana card. Anything to stay legal and do the right thing for me. These are violent criminals who committed violent crimes yet I would be in more trouble for speeding etc.

I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS SHIT. No matter what happens about the report or prosecutions, my government will always be a dirtbag torturing sadist.



lunasun

(21,646 posts)
79. Good point a person could even get beat up or shot for speeding nowdays But these mass killers? nada
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:50 AM
Dec 2014

Hekate

(90,641 posts)
67. IIRC, Nixon was advised that if he accepted the pardon, it would be a tacit admission....
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 03:42 AM
Dec 2014

....of his actual CRIMES. On record in the history books for all time. Because this is the thing: there is no pardon without a crime having taken place.

So when I heard that the ACLU was proposing this for the same reason, well who better to propose this inherently distasteful,action?

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
68. Wow, they are wasting their money with this one.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 05:10 AM
Dec 2014

There is no way TPTB, and that includes most in the Democratic Party as well as the Republican Party will admit any guilt as they seem fine with torture. They just.don't.care. There are no plans by the current administration to even charge them with those crimes against humanity. So, asking him to pardon them is making the assumption they would even be charged in the first place. They won't. So, it is a moot point. They are wasting their money with this one, because nothing is going to get done about it anyhow. So, with no trial or charges pending or even being planned, there is no point in doing this.

Javaman

(62,517 posts)
75. yeah, I had read that.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:41 AM
Dec 2014

just because people have lobbied the white house to pardon those fucking war criminals, doesn't mean he will.

I will wait and see what happened before I go crazy with anger.

on edit, When I said link, I meant one that was not an opinion piece and was something with actual evidence of Obama leaning that way

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
73. I thought Cheney and Obama had already publicly admited...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 10:22 AM
Dec 2014

torture had taken place under them. Not enhanced interrogation, but torture.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
76. yea, that's what we do. Let's hurry up and do it and get on with our
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:46 AM
Dec 2014

miserable lives behind the Invisible iron Curtain.

on point

(2,506 posts)
80. No. But good news is they would still be subject to prosecution outside USA
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:58 AM
Dec 2014

Part of international law allows for prosecution if a country (USA) is unable or unwilling to prosecute

Hekate

(90,641 posts)
86. ACLU sometimes like to stoke controversy. I'd rather this gang of thugs just ....
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 03:36 PM
Dec 2014

.have the threat of international prosecution hanging over their heads the rest of their lives.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
98. Wouldn't convictions and prison sentences also discourage it from ever happening again?
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 08:30 PM
Dec 2014

If Obama doesn't want the job of having his justice department getting involved, just dump Cheney on the front steps of the Hague. I'm sure there are countries that would stand in line to bring these guys to trial.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
99. "diminish the chance of it ever taking place again?" It's happening NOW!
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 08:42 PM
Dec 2014

Just look at what we are turning into inside our United States… militarization of our own police forces? Secret budgets for decades and the left-overs from drug seizures and foreign theaters of operations are in our own back yard.

Yes, I'd say we are mired deep in torture. We have met the enemy. I have steadily since BushCo been so ashamed of being an American. Now we can all say it. We are the domestic terrorists as well as the ones in charge of what we easily termed, "the big lie" when it was the other guy.

That theory is such a load of bullshit. I'd say we have a better suggested course to repair the damage by -

1) Charging the Bush Administration with international war crimes

2) Dissolve the CIA. Blow it into a thousand pieces like Kennedy was ready to do. How much more harm can we afford.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING : ACLU asks Pres...