General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING : ACLU asks Pres. Obama to pardon Bush, Cheney, & company for torture.
No link yet - reported a few minutes ago by Rachel Maddow.
The logic is that it would be a legal admission of sorts that torture actually took place at the hands of the U.S. government, and would diminish the chance of it ever taking place again.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Anthony D. Romero is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)I should have done my due diligence and checked out the source, but I appreciate your effort.
pansypoo53219
(20,969 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)so that's not going to happen.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)1) A pardon protects them under U.S. law, not international law.
2) They are NEVER going to be charged, even without a pardon. The U.S. is NEVER going to to prosecute a politician for war crimes. NEVER.
Understand, I would give a kidney to see it happen, but it just is not going to happen.
pansypoo53219
(20,969 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Only god knows what goes on in Romero's brain these days...
Unless this "pardon" proposal is some kind of bait to destroy Obama, since the left would abandon him en masse if he was dumb enough to do this...
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Then their 5th amendment concerns go away, and they could be compelled to testify.
TBF
(32,045 posts)UTUSN
(70,676 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)half of the sentence they received. They can't be pardoned without being convicted of something.
What has this man been smoking?
Iggo
(47,548 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,413 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)All he has to do is change a few names and phrases, hit print in his word processor, and viola, instant pardon for our favorite war criminals.
And they'll be remembered as "pardoned war criminals" forever.
It's not as much fun as imagining them in prison, but I'm afraid it's the best we're gonna get. And if Obama doesn't do it, it probably won't get done. No republican will touch this thing with a 10 foot pole. And that includes H. Clinton, since she's personal friends with most of them.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Thank you for the post, important to know this as the mass media scream for pardons for the war criminals they helped to create.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)as mis-read. I apologize for my error.
Gothmog
(145,107 posts)Most administrations have pardon attorneys who follow strict guidelines to keep the process orderly. These pardons would not be subject to these guidelines
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)If Obama pardons Cheney and Siegelman in prison I will begin to support the calls for impeachment
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)as follows:
Bush pardoned some people preemptively, see:
http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html
Response to shraby (Reply #4)
Logical This message was self-deleted by its author.
shraby
(21,946 posts)my error.
a reference I like that is easy to navigate:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/
Constitution; other legal documents and recent SCOTUS activity.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)The ONLY limitations are that the president can only pardon federal offenses and that the crime has to have already been committed (can't preemptively pardon) b
dsc
(52,155 posts)Ford Pardoned Nixon sans conviction as did Carter with those who evaded the draft.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)H2O Man
(73,528 posts)states -- for a pardon by a governor -- but it is not accurate for a presidential pardon for a federal crime.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Richard Nixon.
tritsofme
(17,375 posts)As accepting would essentially be an admission of guilt.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)A trip to Europe would likely lead to arrest and trial.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)When you google travel for Bush- https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Bush+can%27t+travel+to+countries
I think only one person was able to sue Cheney? and his case dropped off the face of the earth, probably settled /w non-disclosure. (or worse happened to him?)
Brother Buzz
(36,413 posts)THIS CARD MAY BE KEPT UNTIL NEEDED OR SOLD - handy
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)MFrohike
(1,980 posts)It's in the president's power to grant it, not theirs to accept it. It would simply be a fact, not an agreement between two parties.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Burdick v. United States (1915):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States
United States v. Wilson 32 U.S. 150 (1833)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/150/
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)I didn't know that. I don't really buy their reasoning, but that's the law as it stands.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The pardon is a unilateral act on the part of the embodiment of national law enforcement.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)tritsofme
(17,375 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Dems just need the balls to use the info in the report to publisize the type of politicians the RW truly are.
Iggo
(47,548 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)The elites way of admitting to war crimes, but staying out of prison and not travelling to some places on the global But hey with the money the BFEE has, don't be surprised if they buy a country or part of one move there and build their own mercenary nation.
You just KNOW the next big thing in global warfare are mercenary nations.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)In fact, Cheney bragged.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Response to bullwinkle428 (Original post)
951-Riverside This message was self-deleted by its author.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)our duties and responsibilities under the Geneva Convention on Torture (signed by Reagan and ratified by the Senate during George H.W. Bush's presidency). That Convention has the same force and scope as the U.S. Constitution.
Rex
(65,616 posts)That was a smart move, either admit it or take them to court for what? Defamation of character or slander? However that does not mean they cannot be arrested and impounded (giggles) in another country like Germany. I dunno if that could be used as evidence in another nation's court, but they would have proof that the BFEE admitted to lying about a lot of things.
Put up or shut up. Fuck your museum you warmongering asshole. I'd love to see Cheney arrested in France or Germany.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I like the ACLU's approach here
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Doing so would prevent torture in the future and allow them to testify against the people they gave orders to.
GOOOO ACLU! They're really kicking butt here.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)jimlup
(7,968 posts)But this seems a little much. Why would we grant a pardon? It seems irrelevant and circumspect to the laws of the land. We should prosecute the hell out of those fuckers and the fact that we don't says a great deal about the immunity already granted to the top privileged sectors of our society.
I say NO! Prosecute the bastards and now may actually be the time as the people will be pissed when the report comes or leaks out and that could make it possible. I'd be satisfied with Cheney. I don't think Bush is actually guilty. The guys Cheney's yahoo. He doesn't have the brains to be guilty of anything.
Just streaming of consciousness thoughts ... yeah I'm definitely against a "pardon".
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)Seriously, who can actually believe this argument? Let the powerful guilty walk away scot free and somehow, magically, torture will never happen again! That worked great with the financial sector.
Damn, this really is just disgusting. They'll gin up a few tears, trot out some bullshit like "mistakes were made," and go back to their mansions while the rest of the country gets to pay for their sins. Yeah, more consequence-free behavior for the rich and powerful is really what the country needs.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Pro = Bush and Cheney would be admitting guilt, even though they are forced to take it.
Con = The rat bastards would be out of hot water legally. At least in this country.
Damn.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Even if Siegelman did what is claimed against him, and I am not conceding that anything he may have done was illega., his act was nothing compared to the torture that Bush and Cheney and their staffs approved and ordered.
i differ with the ACLU on this. The harm that the torture did in at least one case as I understand to an innocent victim who was taken and tortured based on a false identification, cannot be healed or made good.
I think that Bush and Cheney should at least apologize first. Really. Torture hurts the soul of the victim. It is not an act that can just be walked away from. At the very least, Obama should not give a pardon unless Bush and Cheney and their staffs request one and admit to their crimes.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Siegelman and Kiriakou.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)You can prosecute them. You can make them subject to foreign prosecution by releasing information that could lead to indictments abroad. But the president issuing backhanded Scarlett Letter pardons is a dumb idea.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)American's need to see the trial of those that broke the Law. No special treatment just because the alleged offenders happen to be the Pres and VP of the US! We are all equal under the law ..... correct?
Matariki
(18,775 posts)As opposed to letting people in power do whatever the fuck they want without consequence.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)aspirant
(3,533 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)If they're not guilty they have nothing to fear vis a vis extradition. Right?
delrem
(9,688 posts)and did something wrong.
Major General Geoffrey D. Miller had no prehistory. No accomplices in high places through successive administrations. None at all. That's because shit happens, then it vanishes and yes, I'll have a coke and fries with that Big Mac. Who could imagine it without?
The US isn't a terrorist nation. Drones are benign. The US believes in the one true god, but except for in the "red states" downplays the sanctity of it, preferring to tout their love of democracy and freedom. They, the terrorists y'know, hate freedom. We all know that, it's bred in our bones. The hundreds of thousands of dead all deserved it. Muslims, Arabs, in this iteration, you know. Brown, or mostly brown - and speaking different languages. I'm sure the focus will shift for the next iteration of freedom loving US foreign policy but please, lets continue giving this iteration a righteous go. And why not? It's so much fun, it's so feel-good.
Terrorists are what the US is at war against, and the fact that the war is against terror justifies everything.
If you don't believe me, just read DU for a week or so. You're sure to be convinced.
Drale
(7,932 posts)chieftain
(3,222 posts)To be effective, the person to be pardoned must accept it which would be an admission of guilt.I would love to see these rat bastards squirm trying to make that decision. My bet is that other than Cheney, the weasels would accept them.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)Who wrote the script "the only other option is to look forward", whatever that might mean?
Where are you, on the highway to hell or something that you're white knuckling it onward? You have no choice to pull aside, find a room to rest, to pause and think coherent thoughts about the total surround situation? Is your reality entirely determined by FOX vs. MSNBC propagandists, by their mind-game?
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)obviously you missed the reference.
http://www.salon.com/2009/01/12/obama_prosecutor/
Obama's justice department grants final immunity to Bush's CIA torturers
Glenn Greenwald
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/31/obama-justice-department-immunity-bush-cia-torturer
"By closing two cases of detainees tortured to death, Obama has put the US beyond any accountability under the rule of law ..."
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)The suggestion that a pardon would somehow stop such a thing from happening again is laughable.
This is not a nation of laws.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)A Brave New World Order Thing.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)nilesobek
(1,423 posts)I had a lost luggage delivery service that was doing nicely. I was getting paid 1.50$ a mile one way. After 9/11 I lost the business instantly because the airport was swarmed with AR-15 toting soldiers and I was informed I needed a million dollars insurance to continue. This partially contributed to my decade of homelessness.
Fast forward to current events: It looks like they are going to get away with it no matter what. Its only us that have to obey the laws of the land, to follow the rules, to wear my seat belt, to have car insurance, to get a medical marijuana card. Anything to stay legal and do the right thing for me. These are violent criminals who committed violent crimes yet I would be in more trouble for speeding etc.
I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS SHIT. No matter what happens about the report or prosecutions, my government will always be a dirtbag torturing sadist.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Hekate
(90,641 posts)....of his actual CRIMES. On record in the history books for all time. Because this is the thing: there is no pardon without a crime having taken place.
So when I heard that the ACLU was proposing this for the same reason, well who better to propose this inherently distasteful,action?
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)There is no way TPTB, and that includes most in the Democratic Party as well as the Republican Party will admit any guilt as they seem fine with torture. They just.don't.care. There are no plans by the current administration to even charge them with those crimes against humanity. So, asking him to pardon them is making the assumption they would even be charged in the first place. They won't. So, it is a moot point. They are wasting their money with this one, because nothing is going to get done about it anyhow. So, with no trial or charges pending or even being planned, there is no point in doing this.
Javaman
(62,517 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Javaman
(62,517 posts)just because people have lobbied the white house to pardon those fucking war criminals, doesn't mean he will.
I will wait and see what happened before I go crazy with anger.
on edit, When I said link, I meant one that was not an opinion piece and was something with actual evidence of Obama leaning that way
B Calm
(28,762 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)torture had taken place under them. Not enhanced interrogation, but torture.
librechik
(30,674 posts)miserable lives behind the Invisible iron Curtain.
on point
(2,506 posts)Part of international law allows for prosecution if a country (USA) is unable or unwilling to prosecute
napkinz
(17,199 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)i think not
the hatred obama is just too strong
Hekate
(90,641 posts).have the threat of international prosecution hanging over their heads the rest of their lives.
Hotler
(11,415 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)ACLU dude has lost it.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I'll never give a freakin' dime to the ACLU again.
How DARE they.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)If Obama doesn't want the job of having his justice department getting involved, just dump Cheney on the front steps of the Hague. I'm sure there are countries that would stand in line to bring these guys to trial.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Just look at what we are turning into inside our United States
militarization of our own police forces? Secret budgets for decades and the left-overs from drug seizures and foreign theaters of operations are in our own back yard.
Yes, I'd say we are mired deep in torture. We have met the enemy. I have steadily since BushCo been so ashamed of being an American. Now we can all say it. We are the domestic terrorists as well as the ones in charge of what we easily termed, "the big lie" when it was the other guy.
That theory is such a load of bullshit. I'd say we have a better suggested course to repair the damage by -
1) Charging the Bush Administration with international war crimes
2) Dissolve the CIA. Blow it into a thousand pieces like Kennedy was ready to do. How much more harm can we afford.
Mike Nelson
(9,951 posts)...it tells readers and viewers they have committed criminal acts (war crimes).
napkinz
(17,199 posts)nt