General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums7 Most Shocking Things in the CIA Torture Report (It's Even Worse Than We Thought)
Last edited Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:13 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/7-things-we-learned-new-report-cia-tortureNEWS & POLITICS
AlterNet / By Cliff Weathers comments_image 34 COMMENTS
7 Most Shocking Things in the CIA Torture Report
It's even worse than we thought.
December 9, 2014 |
- snip -
However, this is not the final report, but a redacted 480-page executive summary. The complete report totals more than 6,000 pages. The Senate Republicans also released a counter-assessment. While some critics say that there is the possibility of retaliation from terrorist groups, others are saying that the fallout over the report will be mostly political.
"Did we torture people? Yes. Did it work? No.," Sen. King, the Maine independent told CNN.
"The greatness of this country is that we can examine mistakes and remedy them and that is the hallmark of a great and just society" Sen. Diane Feinstein, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said to CNN moments before the report's release. Here are the most shocking findings from the report:
1. Some detainees died as a result of interrogation.
In November 2002, an otherwise healthy detainee who had been held partially nude and chained to a concrete floor died from suspected hypothermia at the facility. The CIA's leadership acknowledged little knowledge of advanced interrogation techniques at the detention site where he was held.
2. The techniques were far more brutal than previously known.
Multiple CIA detainees subjected to the techniques suffered from hallucinations, paranoia, insomnia and tried to mutilate themselves, the report says. On one occasion, a high-value al Qaeda suspect named Abu Zubaydah became completely unresponsive after a period of intense waterboarding. He had "bubbles rising through his open full mouth," the report says.
Additionally, detainees were subjected to forced rectal feeding or rectal hydration" even if they did not have medical need for them.
4. The CIA's use of its enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of acquiring intelligence or gaining cooperation from detainees.
- snip -
For example, seven of the 39 CIA detainees known to have been subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques produced no intelligence while in CIA custody. Other detainees provided significant, accurate intelligence prior to, or without having been, subjected to these torture.
- snip -
7. Those who were not suspects were interrogated.
Of the 119 known detainees, at least 26 were wrongfully held and did not meet the detention standard. These included an "intellectually challenged" man whose CIA detention was used solely as leverage to get a family member to provide information, two individuals who were intelligence sources for foreign liaison services and were former CIA sources, and two individuals whom the CIA assessed to be connected to al-Qa'ida based solely on information fabricated by a CIA detainee subjected to the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques. These detainees, however, often remained in custody for months after the CIA determined that they did not meet the MON standard. CIA records provide insufficient information to justify the detention of many other detainees.
MORE[p]
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/cia-torture-report-abuses-rectal-feeding
"Rectal Feeding," Threats to Children, and More: 16 Awful Abuses From the CIA Torture Report
1. The CIA used previously unreported tactics, including "rectal feeding" of detainees (p. 100, footnote 584):
2. CIA officers threatened the children of detainees (p. 4):
3. Over 20 percent of CIA detainees were "wrongfully held." One was an "intellectually challenged" man who was held so the CIA could get leverage over his family (p. 12):
4. One detainee, Abu Hudhaifa, was subjected to "ice water baths" and "66 hours of standing sleep deprivation" before being released because the CIA realized it probably had the wrong man (p. 16, footnote 32):
5. The CIA, contra what it told Congress, began torturing detainees before even determining whether they would cooperate (p. 104):
- snip -
10. The CIA torturers told CIA leadership that torture wasn't producing good information from KSM. But CIA leaders didn't relay that information to Congress (p. 212):
11. A detainee was tortured for not addressing an interrogator as "sir"and for complaining about a stomach ache (p. 106):
REST OF THE HORRORS AT LINK
Aerows
(39,961 posts)how these posts discussing the torture report keep sinking. I'm going to kick this up, because you cannot bury a crime of this magnitude.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Now it's more important to discuss sweater wearing sheep, or at least that is what keeps getting bumped.
Bump anything but inconvenient discussions.
genxlib
(5,524 posts)This is the first time I can remember that I have been physically ill when reading the news.
Among all the depraved shit in this report, there is one thing that is really eating at me worse than the others
The report found that at least 26 detainees were wrongfully held, including an intellectually challenged man who was used as leverage to obtain information from a family member
Let's call it what it is. We kidnapped and held an apparently innocent handicapped person as a hostage for the crime of being related to someone we wanted to fuck with. I don't know why but that one hits me harder than the other stuff.
A part of the American soul died today
Stardust
(3,894 posts)deafskeptic
(463 posts)The last time I saw anything this sick was when a couple of cops attacked a janitor and anally raped him with a plunger. I think they punched holes in his intestines. They were called the plunger cops. It was one of the few times when I wished I didn't have such a vivid imagination.
The CIA report is even more nightmarish than Susan Atkin's description of what happened in the Tate house.
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)and wouldn't have guessed the topic was sinking. From this perspective, it's pervasive...and rightfully so.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)War Horse
(931 posts)because most of us have known about this for years, and many don't really expect much to happen.
But you make a decent point. Worth kicking.
and this is worth being a part of our national conscience - we need to make sure that this NEVER happens again.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)what happened. THis is what they were willing to share with us. What is in the report that they never want to see the light
of day? That is what is truly terrifying. I think most Americans prefer the blue pill. They like their happy illusions and
want to continue to worry about minutia instead of heinous cries that they have no power to fix or erase.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)We knew ENOUGH. We knew enough to put people in jail. We knew enough to impeach Bush and Cheney. We knew ENOUGH. All of these added details are superfluous. We knew ENOUGH. And no one did anything.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)She was in violation of her oath of office when she chose to not make sure those responsible, starting with Bush, paid for their crimes.
Blecht
(3,803 posts)The Bush administration committed war crimes. Everybody in that administration who issued orders for /insert bullshit euphemism for torture here/ needs to be tried in an international court of law, and, if convicted, punished accordingly.
That's all that needs to be said.
I haven't seen you around before. Are you new here?
Yes, I've been here less than 13 years.
I've been here less than 13 years, too.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)As early as 2005, the Red Cross had documented the murders of prisoners who had been tortured to death, various acts of monstrous sadism and terrorism that went far beyond waterboarding (as if that were not treasonous enough).
Aerows
(39,961 posts)acknowledging that torture happened has a little more gravitas than random sources.
I'm curious as to where all of the people that denied torture happened because the reports didn't come from reputable sources are hiding. I mean surely, after so many defenses, so many denials, surely the must be keen to admit they were full of it.
Anyone?
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)It's the organization that verifies compliance with the Geneva Convention. And it's been officially documenting the torture and murder since the middle of the Bush regime.
As for deniers, they don't rate attention. They're just sniveling liars, and that's been obvious from the beginning.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But around 2005 - 07, you couldn't bring up torture without some apologista shrieking that there was no evidence, none of it was credible, the government didn't admit to it, and "why are we talking about something that isn't happening anyway?"
I'm sorry, I forgot "Waterboarding isn't torture."
The lies, excuses and justifications for this were just as horrible then as they are now. And it turns out that what many of us have long suspected was far worse than we ever imagined. "Rectal feeding"?
I can't fucking imagine how horrible it was to a person to undergo that, and I also fear for the soul of the person that carried such an atrocity out.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Shocked. Shocked I tell you...
What a disgrace. It's just sickening.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)where they find the sociopathic animals who will commit these "interrogations" ....
man's inhumanity...
Aerows
(39,961 posts)People that delight in cruelty will do it cheaply, and some will do it for free as long as they are recognized as a "patriot".
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)were convinced that what they were doing was necessary... lesser evil than 9/11. And their actions were aided and abetted by the truly evil.
Understanding with the sociopaths were thinking is easy..... it's the normal everyday people who see themselves as moral that just floors me.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)the distinction you are making. However I think that a person must be able to disassociate to an questionable degree--to be convinced that carrying out torture is "necessary" and therefore a lesser evil. Even if a person feels guilty and has regrets afterward, it takes a certain mental disconnect to rationalize it in the first place. Torture has no place in civilized society. To carry it out crosses a boundary that most sane people would not cross.
But I agree--what is "normal" includes behavior that many of us here would find immoral & unjustifiable.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)What are they capable of at this point ?
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)that sociopaths live among us and can get into positions of power quite easily. These are people who don't care who they hurt or compromise in their quest to get what they want. They have no conscience.
Yes they are to be feared. Learn to look out for them. Get support if one enters your life.
As for the bigger picture, what we can do about eliminating the type in government, I don't have the answers. I wish I did. We have to hope that more people come to see the destruction they do. They must be exposed, and prosecuted for crimes. But they are very good at hiding their crimes or causing others to take the blame.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)for advice in how to deal with Islamic extremists. Its long been known that torture, or, "moderate pressure," as the Israeli courts call it, is standard operating procedure in the Occupied Territories.
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)If they're ordered to by a perceived authority, most people will do this sort of thing.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)altho the Milgram experiments are significant re. compliance with authority --it is still a milder form of punishment. You cannot carry out experiments that would duplicate the real situation of torture.
When the Milgram experiments were replicated with the participants having to physically administer the shock by holding the "learner's" arm --compliance dropped sharply. The 60% compliance rate seems to depend on physical distancing from the subject. There are other differences from the situation at US govt detention centers.
So I stick with my statement that most sane people would not personally carry out the types of extreme torture the government is saying now was done. It is not "normal" to be able to do this. Though I think with the militarization of the society we live in, acceptance for abusive behavior towards "the other" has increased.
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)Not doubting your word but I'd like to read teh study.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)but this list on Wiki refers to them:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
scroll down
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)I get journal access through the OU so I can probably find something from that.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)pretty much sums up that there are no lengths they didn't go to in being monsters wearing human disguises.
derby378
(30,252 posts)Can't download the report at work - has that much really been blacked out?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is horrific enough. I'm not sure I *want* to see the portions that were blacked out.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)who perpetrated the crimes, the order givers and the order perpetrators. and the vicitims. and locations.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)makes me sick to my stomach, hopemountain. It's dirty and sad.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)we must insure the information does not become so sensationalized (like horror films) that further heinous acts/crimes are treated with indifference or more callousness - such as what happens to medical personnel or trauma survivors who learn to shut off their response and thoughts.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Some of that's probably, well, summarizing, and some's probably just sitting on legitimately classified information, but even a tenth of those 5,500 restricted pages having more information like that is more than horrific enough.
derby378
(30,252 posts)...dammit, I wanna know exactly what they did to whom and for how long, even if it makes me puke and curse the gods.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)who were detained in around 2005 0r 2006 at the ages of 6 and 8* (?) is included in those redacted pages?
*might have been 5 and 7
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)gordianot
(15,237 posts)Firing squads, hanging, beheadings etc.. at least they come to an end. Torture of family and friends, mutilation, humiliation, techniques that leave no marks are worse they may never end even if you survive. Murder and torture are two sides of the same coin.
It appears we have embraced the cruel and unusual. A lot of thought went into this, the only outcome is utter revulsion.
stage left
(2,961 posts)Shameful! Horrendous!
gollygee
(22,336 posts)But I doubt anyone will.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)it will be some low level nobody, not the soul-sucking, shit sack inhabiting a human being that dreamed all of this up.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)How can we put patriots on trial for war crimes? He had to have known this and he still called them patriots.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Of course, the first thing he did after being elected President of the United States, was STOP this type of thing.
But, you may not remember that.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Sickening.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)is anyone going to say there aren't still some black sites?
Oh, wait...Obama wouldn't do anything like that. he's one of the good guys. Carry on...
I'm ashamed to be an American.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)We are fighting for the very soul of our nation.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)on trial. The world needs the disinfectant of truth no matter where it might lead.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)rec
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)The military and private contractors were equally as vicious and deadly. Where is that report? Where are the prosecutions for war crimes? It's all so damned sickening and shameful.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and Guantanamo is still in business too
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)my disgustometer is getting overloaded.
Hun Joro
(666 posts)Tatiana
(14,167 posts)I can't even describe how awful this is, in a long line of atrocities committed on behalf of this nation.
And now we are reaping what we have sown in the radicalized jihadists that seek to kill and destroy anything in their path.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Heart-sick. Ashamed, revolted, and heart-sick.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)and recommended!
LiberalArkie
(15,713 posts)I believe we have some of the same type of people in the CIA doing the same type of experiments. It has been hinted of in just about every long term event in which the CIA has been involved.
Auggie
(31,163 posts)Just as "war" provides an excellent testing ground for new weaponry, it does the same for torture.
I was thinking the exact same thing LiberalArkie!
kacekwl
(7,016 posts)we invade / occupy sovereign countries for their oil under false information , overthrow governments and install our corrupt leaders to do our bidding now this crap. It's no wonder so many people join in to do us harm.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)How can we even face anyone from a foreign country until they do?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Thanks for flushing what little human rights credibility the US had left down the shitter, you arrogant fucks.
catchnrelease
(1,945 posts)warrant46
(2,205 posts)The whole administration is going to do nothing. They wont even identify the thugs who did this.
As a former veteran, god help anyone military or other wise captured by the Muslims now.
The torture on anyone from amerika in their hands will be exquisite in the future
drray23
(7,627 posts)If as american taxpayers we have legal standing to force a prosecution by bringing a case to the HCR court ? The full report likely has more than enough details for actipn to be taken. The hcr has prosecuted cases of african leaders with less evidence that this.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)I saw Harry on TV this morning he was on his knees to the Chimp and Cheney in an exquisite performance of cowardice. Its amazing they even bothered with the report if they weren't going to do anything. It was kind of like Farting in the woods.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)I'm sorry, but that to me is even more shocking than the torture. We can cut food stamps for children and people in poverty, and we can refuse to create a jobs bill to repair out creaky old infrastructure and put people to work. But by golly! No problem finding $7 bil cash for some sadists to think up torture tactics. And they call themselves "psychologists?" I would like to know the names of the "psychologists," who took this blood money. Are they any different than Judas Iscariot taking 30 pieces of silver to torture Jesus? More needs to be said about this.
genxlib
(5,524 posts)Where did you see that number. I saw 81 million.
Which is 81 million too much of course. Your premise is valid nevertheless.
As I pointed out to my conservative friend, that seems to be an exceptionally pour value considering the number of psychopaths we have in prison that would show you how to do that depraved shit for free.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)Thanks for adding the link to that one, Hissyspit.
That some CIA staff were moved to tears and "choked up" is a pretty tough thing to imagine. I doubt we'll ever learn just how horrific that torture actually was.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)...of all the actionable intelligence that was lost simply because CIA scumbags wanted to beat the shit out of defenseless detainees. Actionable intelligence that could have been used to protect our nation and American service personnel overseas. But oh no....Bush's CIA had to act like incompetent Gestapo thugs.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Alone in his cell at Leavenworth Federal Prison.
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)I think they already shielded him from prosecution.....at least in this country.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I mean, really?
They had to say that he was uninvolved. If Bush is taken to court, he would roll over on everyone and everything. No one would have a defense if the former President is indicted. They all have to lie about his involvement.
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)I believe it is true the report claims he was in the dark.
I believe the report lies to shield the president from prosecution in this country.
And last I believe you have the reason why the report shields Bush:
They had to say that he was uninvolved. If Bush is taken to court, he would roll over on everyone and everything. No one would have a defense if the former President is indicted. They all have to lie about his involvement.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I misunderstood your meaning at first. Please pardon my initial response.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)Kablooie
(18,625 posts)The Bush people made up all the "good information" they wanted whenever it suited their purposes.
They had no use for true information.
The torture was intended to just torture.
These guys were considered bad guys so the administration wanted to have them tortured because they deserved it.
They enjoyed the idea that these guys were suffering at their whim.
You know that's what was really in their mind.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Forewarned, we now are.
Anyone expect Obama to have any of these murderers and rapists prosecuted?
warrant46
(2,205 posts)He's more interested in his present golf game
Initech
(100,063 posts)niyad
(113,259 posts)It's even WORSE than what we thought we thought. Remember, what has been revealed is a summary of 1/10th of the report, not even considering all the redactions. The original report has some 6,000 pages. What we are allowed to know is but a mere spit in the wind. We know nothing.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)And horribly sick. I feel sick.
I dislike the title of the Alternet issue (and the Mother Jones article). This is a serious issue. Enough with these lists. "7 Most Shocking Things" just sounds like clickbait. These are all shocking things. Some gravitas would be nice.
my morning pages
(14 posts)If it's still happening, why are they releasing info from ten years ago. Must be a distraction because nothing has changed.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Force-feeding is still happening (or was until recently) but that's via a tube in the mouth.
Response to CJCRANE (Reply #88)
Name removed Message auto-removed
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Besides, force feeding is torture.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Iggo
(47,549 posts)wagepeace
(15 posts)And yet, the GOP (I'm calling you out Darrell Issa) are literally foaming at the mouth to impeach Obama over the Affordable Care Act because as we all know, Torture and providing Affordable Healthcare for millions of Americans are soooo similar....Oh wait...NO!! they're not similar at all!!
lark
(23,091 posts)and the rest of their criminal co-conspirations will rot there.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)But, just in case there's not, let's get 'em in this life.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)These horrendous crimes can no longer be ignored.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)mother earth
(6,002 posts)to the perpetrators? It begs the question what kind of person would do this? and what are the aftereffects to the personality that would agree to do this?
This is the height of monstrosity, but then to defend this as hooey, to try and minimize acts of vile torture that were nonproductive and were known before and after to be felonies, it becomes unclear as to who the terrorist is.
And then I think about Jeremy Scahill, I think about HBO's VICE features on these wars, esp. regarding the extraordinary amounts of money we are funneling into mercenaries for profits in never ending war, for wars fought with paid for mercenaries who have absolutely NO allegiance to country, and we've got a recipe for wars to last til doomsday with no clear enemies, an enemy of thugs, murderers and exactly what seems to be brewing with ISIL....terrorism is a huge paycheck, just ask the psychologists who sold there souls, for what - I think the going price was $82 million on a few of them to drudge up these techniques?
Tax dollars hard at work.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)IS, Al Qaeda et.al, would be lauded as freedom fighters and heroes.
As several have already said, reading about this makes me physically sick, it is so disgusting. That this was done "in our name" is so awful to contemplate I cannot comprehend it.
I don't want to be safer if the means to that safety is torture. I would live under quite a lot of risk and danger if it meant that people on my side didn't torture. When we know that torture *doesn't* make us safer, that in fact it puts us in more danger, well, that's just the dingleberry on top of a shit mountain, to put it crudely.