General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI.R.S. Asset Seizure Case (against Carole Hinders) Is Dropped by Prosecutors
Federal prosecutors have agreed to dismiss a case against Carole Hinders, an Iowa restaurant owner whose bank account was seized by the I.R.S. based solely on a pattern of cash deposits, Ms. Hinders lawyer said Friday.
After her deposition, at which it became overwhelmingly clear that Carole was an innocent and hardworking restaurateur, the assistant United States attorney on the case told us that he informed the I.R.S. that they should not go forward with the case, said Larry Salzman, a lawyer with the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit law firm representing Ms. Hinders.
...
Ms. Hinders was never accused of any crime. The Mexican restaurant she owned, Mrs. Ladys, did not accept credit cards, and she regularly deposited earnings in a bank branch a block away.
After doing business this way for nearly four decades, Ms. Hinders was told that the I.R.S. had seized $33,000 from her bank account after agents detected a pattern of deposits under $10,000. Under a law designed to catch terrorists, money launderers and drug lords, depositing less than $10,000 is illegal if it is done to evade a federal bank reporting requirement, but Ms. Hinders, 67, said she never knew about the requirement.
Read the rest at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/14/us/irs-asset-forfeiture-case-is-dropped-.html?_r=1
DU thread on the issue from October: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5722353
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)jameshenry
(1 post)If Ms Hinders never knew about the reqirement that amount deposited less than $10,000 to evade tax is illegal and thus punishable. dismissing the case on this point is absolutely right. In such case she is to be warned firstly and then still if she continues the same mode, in such case she first of all should be warned in writing and thereafter suitable action may be initiated.
derekbrian
(1 post)What ever done by IRS in the concerned matter is done is haste and hurry. Ms. Hinders is hardworking and law abiding. If tax save was her intention she can do it earlier by following any fraud mode. It is absolutely illegal on the part of the IRS officials.